Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Other Aircrew Forums > Flight Testing
Reload this Page >

Corp Twin (dissimilar) Jet C/Line Engines

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Flight Testing A forum for test pilots, flight test engineers, observers, telemetry and instrumentation engineers and anybody else involved in the demanding and complex business of testing aeroplanes, helicopters and equipment.

Corp Twin (dissimilar) Jet C/Line Engines

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th September 2003 | 10:07
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 321
Likes: 4
From: Australia
Corp Twin (dissimilar) Jet C/Line Engines

Some time ago, prob 5-6 years, I read an article, again prob in Pro Pilot mag, about the feasibility of designing a corporate jet, with 2 engines providing centreline thrust. (one above the other).
The interesting point about this concept was that the engines were of dissimilar thrust, ie one large and one small.
The idea was to use both for takeoff/landing and then in the cruise shut one down (can't remember whether it was the large or the small).
If anybody remembers this article or can point me to a website, it would be greatly appreciated. TIA.
dogcharlietree is offline  
Old 25th September 2003 | 23:55
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,776
Likes: 350
From: UK
My ‘corporate’ twin-engine jet with centreline thrust - engines mounted over / under, flew extremely well on one engine or with dissimilar power. Unfortunately early versions tended to catch fire during relight! BAC Lightning F1 – F6
safetypee is offline  
Old 26th September 2003 | 00:54
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
From: Texas, USA
I think there was a trident variant with a fourth smaller engine planned, vertically above the middle tail engine.

Hawker Siddeley offered a Trident 3B (Boost) model incorporating a fourth engine mounted above the central Spey jet just below the rudder. This would be an RB.162-86 engine derived from a military vertical-takeoff engine
Web site is here Trident History
kabz is offline  
Old 26th September 2003 | 12:30
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 734
Likes: 0
From: Nirvana South
This sounds a lot like a proposal that was kicking around our Powerplant group a few years ago. The basis is that a high bypass ratio fan is great for takeoff thrust, noise etc but its efficiency is much less than a pure turbojet at altitude.

Guess the problem would be what do you do with the other half of the pair when you don't need it - don't think any (civilian) pilot would intentionally shut down his main engine twice in a flight...
ICT_SLB is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.