Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Flight/Ground Ops, Crewing and Dispatch
Reload this Page >

Why are same aircraft types loaded differently

Wikiposts
Search
Flight/Ground Ops, Crewing and Dispatch A forum for the people who are engaged in operational control/flight dispatch/crewing and their colleagues airside in ramp dispatch, load control and ground handling, to discuss issues directly related to keeping their aircrew and aircraft operational.

Why are same aircraft types loaded differently

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Jun 2009, 22:13
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Manchester
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why are same aircraft types loaded differently

Example....Thompson 757-200 mainly 120 in hold 3, 100 in hold 4, and remainder in hold 2

Thomas cook 757-200 mainly 80 in hold 2, 120 in 3, and remainder in 4

Jet 2 757-200 STUFF AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE IN 3+4.
Rampmole is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2009, 22:54
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: East Midlands
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ramp

Maybe the standard loading plan refects the degree of trim required by each airline.

as a 757-200 freight operator, we adopted a further aft C of G trim for economy about a year ago.



Bored
boredcounter is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2009, 01:54
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Larne, UK
Posts: 990
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
also down to the dispatcher... ive seen A319's arrive with all the bags in hold 5, yet they get loaded up with all the bags into hold 4... even though its similar PAX and bags/cargo figure
tigger2k8 is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2009, 10:51
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: platform9
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
cabin lay-out might be different, and thus resulting in a different basic index.
744rules is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2009, 11:25
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: London
Posts: 444
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I believe Ryanair actually prefer a nosey trim! I expected them to prefer an aft cg for economy/efficiency however a friend who flies for them says its due to speed stability issues when on ground.
boeingbus2002 is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2009, 12:05
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: BHX
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Depends on the carrier i assume.
TCX for me is 80 hold 2 100 hold 3 and remainder bags, buggys etc in hold 4.
I have seen A320's come in and they dont use the forward holds at all. 3,4 and 5 are filled as much as possible.

Either as per carrier recommendations or for optimum fuel trim.

RN
RollNow! is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2009, 12:29
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: dublin
Age: 56
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And for me there is no such thing as "standard" loading, every flight can be different, you can have an assummed load based on a full flight and thats about it as even the destination or time of flight can be a factor such as golf clubs on faro flights or ski equipment or flights business type flights that may be full of people but very little baggage
dublindispatch is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2009, 16:24
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: London
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There are a number of different reasons for this principally
1. Aircraft cabin configuration where are the galleys located, seating configuration etc.
2. Airline preference
a. Fuel saving, aft C of G usually saves fuel although the actual saving varies by aircraft type
b. Speed of turnround, the operator might prioritise a quick turnround over fuel saving this may necessitate use of but forward and rear holds so two crews can load the aircraft.
c. Loading restraints may mean that cargo can only be loaded in certain locations.
d. Seasonal loads like Skis
STN Ramp Rat is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2009, 21:08
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Bradford
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can't speak for the others but at Jet2 its company policy to trim the aircraft back heavy for economy savings.

From a pax perspective the online check in system allocates pax in the aft section of the aircraft automatically, but when its a light flight i.e B733 on uk domestics, having 40 pax in bay C and 10 pax in bay A causes some right promblems!
righthandrule is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.