Wikiposts
Search
Flight/Ground Ops, Crewing and Dispatch A forum for the people who are engaged in operational control/flight dispatch/crewing and their colleagues airside in ramp dispatch, load control and ground handling, to discuss issues directly related to keeping their aircrew and aircraft operational.

Virgin towing A/C fuel savings

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Dec 2006, 16:16
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: the100thwindow
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Virgin towing A/C fuel savings

Perhaps this may go to another section / or has someone written about this- Mods???
I would just like to know if what the opinion is on Virgin towing A/C to 'starting grids' at LHR.

Is this realistic or just spin in an attempt to look green.
Can the ground agent really have equipment / staff available to be back and forth iso push back and move on to the next A/C?
Wouldnt these Grid stands need some sort of ground powe?
Space at LHR, where is this likely to be if the is a queue, do the A/C sit on these stands and then get slotted in somewhere? How does this affect other carriers not involved in this scheme

Any thoughts?
Who'stheDaddy is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2006, 19:44
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: LGW
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's only a trial to test the viability of the project and analyse the savings etc.

The handling agents don't at present have the resources for it to be launched immediately but as I said there is no need for it at present and no ground power is required as the aicraft have an APU. In the event of an inop APU then an on stand engine start would have to be carried out as normal.

I should point out the trial isn't just a Virgin project it is being run along with BAA and NATS.
srs what? is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2006, 20:34
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: the dark side
Posts: 1,112
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Having done environmental work in the past the idea seems completely viable. The greatest amount of pollution around an airfield is from ground based operations, taxiing, road vehicles etc. It will have a beneficial impact. How that stacks up with having sufficient 'push back' staff/tugs and the cost of those too, to implement it somewhere like Heathrow remains to be seen. Another issue is in LVP's, it will make it very interesting for ATC to resolve those issues if it became standard practise. I imagine it would quickly revert to powered operations to become manageable.
The other benefit no one seems to have latched onto is the potential reduction of noise too. It would make a considerable contribution to the local enviroment to cut out a significant amount of the taxiing noise.
jumpseater is offline  
Old 16th Dec 2006, 00:52
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In my own little world
Posts: 776
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Who'stheDaddy
Space at LHR, where is this likely to be if the is a queue, do the A/C sit on these stands and then get slotted in somewhere? How does this affect other carriers not involved in this scheme
Any thoughts?
If there is a queue (which is more often than not at LHR), then it probably won't make much difference to taxi times. I guess they would tow the a/c to the back of the queue, stop for a couple of minutes to disconnect the tug and start up, then off you go.

The process I imagine would be similer to the way they de-ice on the continent - having a de-ice area on a taxiway just before the end of the runway so the a/c pull up, get de-iced then off they go. (wish BAA would introduce that at LHR as well - would save loads of hassle with hold over times when its busy - but thats another thread !!).

I think the idea is also to challenge the thinking behind current operations that are the "norm" just because thats the way it has always been done and try and introduce a new way of thinking about the ground operations as a whole in the same way that the STARS project (is that the correct name - I can't remember) is looking to eventually get rid of airways and allowing the a/c to navigate directly from A-B which has been trialled on the Pacific routes over the last few years.

Things like this have to be tried to see if they work otherwise we would never progress. If it doesn't work, then at least we can say we tried and then back to the drawing board to find another solution.

I am however waiting for all the tree huggers to start campaigning for the mass slaughter of cows - they are responsible for more global warming than air travel

Leezyjet is offline  
Old 25th Dec 2006, 13:18
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: SOUTHEAST ENGLAND (SOMEWHERE)
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would say that BAA and ATC have been sucked into it as its bad press not to go along with virgins idea and at least try it,

On the first test at heathrow, it was due to be a 1000 departure, it then got pushed back to a 1500 departure i wonder why,??

The next thing is request for engineers and a air start out to the hold no doubt.

They would need more staff, more tugs, more time, and no doubt on busy days aircraft taxiing behind the towing aircraft and would use more fuel??.

Best to give it a go i guess it may work,
BIGBATMAN is offline  
Old 27th Dec 2006, 22:14
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In my own little world
Posts: 776
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The next thing is request for engineers and a air start out to the hold no doubt.
Would only be done on a/c with fully servicable APU, and Engineers do the headset anyway. Although if the trials are succesful and it does become the "norm" then there is no reason why they couldn't have ASU's out at the starting grid just incase - like having the de-icing rigs out on the de-ice pad.
They would need more staff, more tugs, more time, and no doubt on busy days aircraft taxiing behind the towing aircraft and would use more fuel??.
If it becomes the "norm" then everyone would be towing out, and the current plan is to use TBL tugs only as they can tow faster to minimise delays.
At a station like LHR, the time differences are probably not going to be noticable anyway as the queues are normally so long. It will just mean a/c spending less time sitting in the queues pumping out fumes into the atmosphere.
Leezyjet is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.