Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Flight/Ground Ops, Crewing and Dispatch A forum for the people who are engaged in operational control/flight dispatch/crewing and their colleagues airside in ramp dispatch, load control and ground handling, to discuss issues directly related to keeping their aircrew and aircraft operational.

Sw axis and suspended flights

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th July 2005 | 14:28
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter

Time merchant
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
From: Belgium
Sw axis and suspended flights

Hello all!
A genuine question to try to get to the bottom of a problem:

As many of you are aware there is a SW axis teleconference between AOs, FMPs, CFMU and other interested parties.
They come up with a plan to force certain flows of traffic through areas of lower demand. The objective is to reduce the overall delay and to maximise available capacity.

We force certain flows of traffic on to these new routes by effectively banning them from the busy routes.
We do this by using "zero rate" regulations. These regulations "suspend" the affected flights.

Now, the details of the flows affected are published in the Network Brief distributed by NMC (pretactical) and available on the Eurocontrol website. They are also sent out as an AIM in the form of the "Network News"

Additionally they are published in the ANM with a description of which flights are affected and where they should refile.

My question is this:
With all this pre-notification and involvement of those concerned, why do some AOs still wait until their flights are suspended (2 hours before EOBT) before re-routeing ? These flights are then treated as late filers or late updaters and inevitably receive disproportionately higher delays than those who have done their flight planning in good time.
I know BA arrange all their SW axis flights immediately after the SW axis teleconference on Friday. So it is possible.

Any feedback will be welcome, maybe we can change things here to help out.

Awaiting incoming.........

flowman
flowman is offline  
Old 30th July 2005 | 20:18
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: the jungle
How about making the offload route (Bames-Abuda..etc) RAD compliant and thus allowing the AO's to change their RPL's for SAT and SUN only to stop the last minute changes ?

ML

Last edited by monkey lover; 31st July 2005 at 04:06.
monkey lover is offline  
Old 30th July 2005 | 20:58
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter

Time merchant
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
From: Belgium
We can't change the RAD. Its agreed by representatives of the member states in a long and dreary meeting in the winter.
We negotiate short term exceptions (such as BAMES-ABUDA) to give us some extra flexibility. We then tell IFPU to force the affected flights in against the RAD. Also we normally receive a low rate for such flights (e.g. 2 per hour) so simply opening it for the weekend is not an option available to us.
flowman is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.