My problem is mr nutloose, that when i want to work in Malaysia or an other contry in asia, they refused licence EASA except that resulting in Great britain.
All company there want only work with B1 EASA licence issued in UK ...I have the same licence with an british mechanic and i don't understand why this segregation....

masen

From an earlier post therefore it is hard to judge at what level these approved persons were at when they were given their licences, all UK issued licences were gained by examination after examination after examination.

This is not a slight against anyone just as it is seen by employers looking for certain qualities.

My question to the CAA:

"Hi Mrs Mundie,
but why in Malaysia or other contry in asia, they refused licence EASA except that resulting in Great britain?
Regards."


The answer of the CAA:
"Dear Sir

We regret we are unable to comment on the requirements of other countries. We can only re-iterate that there is no provision within the Regulation for Change of State of licence issue.

Many thanks

Mrs C Mundie
L&TS"


No comment!

help with info to convert My ICAO license to EASA - Page 2 - Aircraft Engineers Bulletin Board

converting my French license , i would say : NFI.
now , if somebody wants to test the quality of my way of working , no probs , send me a ticket and you will see ...
PS: you can choose between these types to test me : 330 , 340 , 340-500/600 , 767 , 747 , 744 and 777 ... or all of them , if you want ! or ask me to do a lockwiring by hand with closed eyes ...
Cheers and Brgds.
MM.

matmax have you ever worked for a quality company or do you jump ship before they catch you out?

The whole point is that certain Eu countries licenses (France etc) were considered not as good as other countries (UK etc), so after the conversion to a 'level playing field' for EASA licenses, some countries engineers got a full B1/B2 on the basis of what they currently held, and the fact that certain countries (UK) had a world recognised exam path to get those licenses meant that the new JAR66 is only worth having if issued in certain countries. I do not mean to put down engineers from any particular country but you can see that the path to achieve the old licences were a bit different across Europe so how they can issue a common licence based on them is beyond belief....it is now showing up in job adverts as you have seen....

SC,
you are welcome.
my previous companies : ek and af ...
quality companies ?
is it a proposal?

madmax my question still stands. AF well you could write a book about them.

Mates,
go on thinking you are the only one , you will go far.
i have helped some Brits who made some mistakes before and i am still helping some nowadays not only because i am their Shift Manager but thats a way of thinking ... and i am not taking myself for God as some other guys here ...
do you need names and places and companies ?
it is not because a country got a Licensing system before another one that their Engineers are "better"...
was it a proof that you were not a butcher or a baker ?
have a look on your ex-colonies , some of their Engineers have a higher level ... think about it !
Cheers and Brgds.
MM.

SC,
about AF , the launch company of the 777-300 ER , who never land before the runway because of frozen fuel in the engines ...
AF , the first european airlines for the 380 .
I am not working for AF anymore ...
any thing to say about EK ?
ah yes , they are dreaming to be an airline like AF ...
a book can not be written about BA ?
SC , we are going to drift from the thread.

madmax, BA wrote the book.

SC,
first of all , if you are really 55 , you get my respect.
second , "BA wrote the book" , that was easy but well played (are you really sure ?) ...
third , my question still stands , is it a proposal ?
good !!! i get a new friend !!!
i was not here for nothing or to be banned ...
Cheers and Brgds.
MM.

BA wrote the book ...

from wikipedia (sorry in French):

British Airways est la troisième compagnie aérienne européenne après le groupe Air France-KLM et l'allemand Lufthansa.

they also say that BA was created in 1974 and AF in 1933.
SC , Who wrote the book ???
Cheers and Brgds.
MM.

madmax your history is as sound as the maginot line.

Imperial Airways (1924) eventually became BA

Who wrote the book?

SC ,
you are right about Imperial Airways , as per wikipedia , but sorry sir , even my son who is 7 years , can read the difference between Imperial Airways and British Airways ...
sorry about my arrogancy , i have learned that when i was in very hot place , close to hell with some Br....h guys ...
can you , anyway understand this :
British Airways est la troisième compagnie aérienne européenne après le groupe Air France-KLM et l'allemand Lufthansa
if you need a translation , it will be a pleasure for me to help.
as i said we are drifting ...

wiki also says : BA , 234 A/C and AF , 413 ...
is it comparable ?

nearly double for the frenchies , nope ?

I see we're back to the same old arguement again.:ugh:

Nobody is boasting or saying who's better than who. The system is such that employers in certain countries prefer people with licences from certain other countries, rightly or wrongly that is a fact.:sad:

yes , spanners maybe wrongly ...
anyway , not a big deal for me.
how can you judge without knowing ?
UK or France , are we not both europeans ? and we are using the same money ... oooppss , sorry .
from NWT : The whole point is that certain Eu countries licenses (France etc) were considered not as good as other countries (UK etc) ...
consideration is a feeling (and not certain) , not a fact !
Cheers and Brgds.
MM.