aircraft checks using a drone !
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: london
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
aircraft checks using a drone !
New technology is helping engineers to carry out safety checks on aircraft.
What can take the human eye more than a day to find, a drone can spot in a matter of hours.
The drones are able to create 3D images with millimetre accuracy.
The BBC's Richard Westcott has been to see the technology in action at Luton Airport.
BBC News - Drone technology used in aircraft safety checks
What can take the human eye more than a day to find, a drone can spot in a matter of hours.
The drones are able to create 3D images with millimetre accuracy.
The BBC's Richard Westcott has been to see the technology in action at Luton Airport.
BBC News - Drone technology used in aircraft safety checks
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: LHR
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The inspections they would be used for, I would assume, would mostly be things like assessing damage or inspections.
The issue I have is that to properly do these inspections you require (preferably) dry, non windy conditions and
'He added that it is safer to have drones working at height than humans having to go up on a rig'
I would argue this. It's not safer, it's cheaper. If I'm doing a crown inspection it's not an unsafe task assuming I have the correct safety equipment and PPE. I fail to see how a drone flying around the aircraft magically makes it safer, considering they are, as mentioned, susceptible to wind gusts (hence could fly into the structure) and I assume have to be operated by a human, who would need to control them and all the associated chances of accidents related to that.
To be honest whilst the technology is great, it's in its early stages and whilst they could map damage, the chances are they couldn't be used in the conditions they are needed to be used in (ramp conditions) and I bet they aren't cheap !
Or maybe I'm just bias being a human.
Safe flying
Tech_Log
The issue I have is that to properly do these inspections you require (preferably) dry, non windy conditions and
'He added that it is safer to have drones working at height than humans having to go up on a rig'
I would argue this. It's not safer, it's cheaper. If I'm doing a crown inspection it's not an unsafe task assuming I have the correct safety equipment and PPE. I fail to see how a drone flying around the aircraft magically makes it safer, considering they are, as mentioned, susceptible to wind gusts (hence could fly into the structure) and I assume have to be operated by a human, who would need to control them and all the associated chances of accidents related to that.
To be honest whilst the technology is great, it's in its early stages and whilst they could map damage, the chances are they couldn't be used in the conditions they are needed to be used in (ramp conditions) and I bet they aren't cheap !
Or maybe I'm just bias being a human.
Safe flying
Tech_Log
Thought police antagonist
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Where I always have been...firmly in the real world
Posts: 1,371
Received 112 Likes
on
79 Posts
Hmmm ?....the drone is only the start.
What should also be running concurrently is the development of a small robot if you think about it....
Winter / foul wx etc.....launch drone for walk round etc and then ( this is where said drone gets a shade problematic ) ...robot for oils / tyre px.....sit in crew room in the dry and drink coffee etc during whole process.....perfect !
Wot ?......
What should also be running concurrently is the development of a small robot if you think about it....
Winter / foul wx etc.....launch drone for walk round etc and then ( this is where said drone gets a shade problematic ) ...robot for oils / tyre px.....sit in crew room in the dry and drink coffee etc during whole process.....perfect !
Wot ?......
