Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Engineers & Technicians
Reload this Page >

Australian Recognition by EASA

Wikiposts
Search
Engineers & Technicians In this day and age of increased CRM and safety awareness, a forum for the guys and girls who keep our a/c serviceable.

Australian Recognition by EASA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Oct 2013, 03:03
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Sydney
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Australian Recognition by EASA

I'm a young Australian avionics AME who has ambitions of living and working in the financially unstable utopia known as Europe at some point in my life. Hopefully sooner rather than later.

Some of the options I've considered are:

Working as an Avionics AME
Getting myself an unrated B2
Buying myself a course on B737, A320, A330 etc.

I've been doing some research and asking my seniors just how feasible that actually is. I've heard a variety of conflicting opinions. Some have suggested EASA will recognise my Australian Cert 4. Some have suggested EASA will recognise a B2. Some have suggested you must go via the UK or Switzerland.
There has been very little consistency.

I called EASA myself and was told that my entire qualification meant nothing and that I would have to start from being an apprentice again. I doubt this very much.

Can anyone here provide some credible insight?
Degrees is offline  
Old 30th Oct 2013, 09:32
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: .
Posts: 2,997
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

At this time the EASA person you spoke to is correct. As for the future who knows!
spannersatcx is offline  
Old 8th Nov 2013, 07:21
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: AUSTRALIA
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
EASA and CASA both have their heads up their proverbial a7$es.

Considering all CASA approved training modules are now virtually word for word of the EASA modules, EASA is kidding itself that it has a more robust training system than CASA. And vice versa to a degree. The modules are 98% the same now, and there should be a recognition process to allow engineers and technicians to work globally.

If you are going to Europe, and spending time retraining in aviation maintenance, do yourself a favour. Spend your precious money wisely and train yourself on a skill set that is transferable, and not treated with such disdain by airlines and national regulators alike.
Long Bay Mauler is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2013, 08:05
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Uk
Age: 59
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As said earlier , EASA will not accept CASA modules , licenses or types . I know of several engineers who have got the basic license then been told that their types and experience is not acceptable ! It has cost them a great deal of stress and even more money !
TinyTim2 is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2013, 08:52
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Tullamarine, Australia
Age: 37
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't interoperability between EASA and CASA pretty much the only reason for going to Part 66?
emergency000 is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2013, 09:29
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 106
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well that is the horses#*t they spun us but in reality we all know it will never happen. Now they are doing the same with Part 61 ......
edsbar is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.