Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Engineers & Technicians
Reload this Page >

Ethiopean 787 fire at Heathrow

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Engineers & Technicians In this day and age of increased CRM and safety awareness, a forum for the guys and girls who keep our a/c serviceable.

Ethiopean 787 fire at Heathrow

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th September 2013 | 07:25
  #841 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 941
Likes: 0
From: what U.S. calls ´old Europe´
Wouldnt put the A380 'Glare' in the same league as carbon fibre
Actually Glare is certified to be fireproof. It outperforms aluminum by several orders of magnitude. It even outperforms steel depending on the exact test setup. It is used as firewall and as cargo liner fire barrier. It´s a shame that Airbus did abandon it on the A350.
Volume is offline  
Reply
Old 18th September 2013 | 10:35
  #842 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: N24 E56
Will the aircraft become flyable and return to normal flying or will be grounded
inducedrag is offline  
Reply
Old 18th September 2013 | 16:36
  #843 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From: Dubai
Status

Has anyone got news on the repair status of this grounded Ethiopian aircraft? Would like to hear about the progress - just curious.
Hi_Tech is offline  
Reply
Old 21st September 2013 | 19:48
  #844 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: Rainford
I am led to believe she had had her engines removed and parts of the interior. As far as the repair is concernee no one really knows. I run a website that catalogues the dreamliner airframes and incidents etc (b787register) and I have tried to contact Ethiopian but they never respond.
I wouldn't at all be surprised to see her broken up
Dave Cummings is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd September 2013 | 12:01
  #845 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 56
Likes: 2
From: Beyond the Blue Horizon
But until I do, here it is:
Ethiopian 787 'Queen of Sheba' | Flickr - Photo Sharing!
JT Eagle is online now  
Reply
Old 24th September 2013 | 16:45
  #846 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
b787register

b787register.co.uk for the curious

Last edited by poorjohn; 24th September 2013 at 16:47. Reason: found the url
poorjohn is offline  
Reply
Old 24th September 2013 | 18:55
  #847 (permalink)  
Community Builder
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 17,724
Likes: 2,093
From: Reading, UK
But until I do, here it is
And it certainly hasn't had its engines removed in the two weeks since that photo was taken.

It's currently occupying Stand 616 at LHR (western side of the Cargo cul-de-sac) while its fate is being considered.
DaveReidUK is online now  
Reply
Old 26th September 2013 | 14:00
  #848 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: Rainford
I wonder if she had the engines removed for some knida maintenance or even if I had been fed some duff info.
It looks like from the photo she has the inlets covered for her engines. Perhaps thats where the confusion was someone saw people putting these covers on and assumed the engines where being removed?

Last edited by Dave Cummings; 26th September 2013 at 14:02.
Dave Cummings is offline  
Reply
Old 26th September 2013 | 14:39
  #849 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 1
From: Florida
OTHO why would you leave engines sitting idle for several weeks when they should be located in a spares location in case somebody needs one immediately ?
lomapaseo is offline  
Reply
Old 26th September 2013 | 15:00
  #850 (permalink)  
Community Builder
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 17,724
Likes: 2,093
From: Reading, UK
OTHO why would you leave engines sitting idle for several weeks when they should be located in a spares location in case somebody needs one immediately ?
If somebody needed one immediately, that would only help if they had conveniently gone u/s at wherever you had chosen to locate the spares.

I suspect there are enough spare GEnx engines already to support the fleet, anyway.

There is also the issue of perception - while ETH and Boeing are trying to maintain the impression (whether true or not) that the aircraft isn't a write-off, it wouldn't be good PR to have the aircraft start to look like a Christmas tree.
DaveReidUK is online now  
Reply
Old 26th September 2013 | 15:56
  #851 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From: Lancs, UK
OTHO why would you leave engines sitting idle for several weeks when they should be located in a spares location in case somebody needs one immediately ?
I would presume that until the lawyers/insurance underwriters have fully established the cause/liabilty, the a/c would remain intact until the time a descision is made about what will happen to it.
E_S_P is offline  
Reply
Old 27th September 2013 | 18:06
  #852 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: Rainford
Let's be hones if they could repair it they would have started working on it and not prepared it for what looks like long term storage or worse
Dave Cummings is offline  
Reply
Old 27th September 2013 | 18:18
  #853 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,609
Likes: 0
From: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Originally Posted by lomapaseo
OTHO why would you leave engines sitting idle for several weeks when they should be located in a spares location in case somebody needs one immediately ?
Depends if they have fuel filters is one guess.
glad rag is offline  
Reply
Old 27th September 2013 | 18:42
  #854 (permalink)  
Community Builder
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 17,724
Likes: 2,093
From: Reading, UK
they would have started working on it and not prepared it for what looks like long term storage or worse
Other than wheel covers and engine blanks (both readily removable) I can't see any evidence of preparation for long-term storage. The doors haven't been taped, the transparencies haven't been blanked, etc, and even if it were destined for storage that clearly wouldn't be in situ, where it must be clocking up a fortune in airport parking charges.
DaveReidUK is online now  
Reply
Old 27th September 2013 | 19:52
  #855 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Aviation Qualifications: Non-Aircrew
Posts: 5,679
Likes: 3,341
From: Everett, WA
If the decision had been made to scrap it, I'd expect the engines and other high value LRUs would already be removed.

Without knowing the extent of the (non-structural) fire damage to the interior, I'd think the easiest repair would be to simply replace the aft fuselage tail section. The 787 fuselage is manufactured as sections - nose, a few constant diameter pieces, and tail - based on the pieces I see sitting around at Boeing waiting for final assembly, the tail section would have most if not all of the structural damage.

A bigger issue might the interior - I suspect most of the interior suffered smoke damage and would need to be replaced (that smell simply does not go away).

It's also possible that if the air safety investigation is still open, it may be quarantined in case the authorities want to do further inspections.
tdracer is offline  
Reply
Old 7th October 2013 | 12:20
  #856 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,609
Likes: 0
From: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
It's also possible that if the air safety investigation is still open, it may be quarantined in case the authorities want to do further inspections.
Nail hit on head.
glad rag is offline  
Reply
Old 7th October 2013 | 14:24
  #857 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 1
From: Florida
It's also possible that if the air safety investigation is still open, it may be quarantined in case the authorities want to do further inspections.
No way,

none of this "just in case" stuff when it comes to million dollar resources.

The investigators will be happy to continue a leisurely investigation only if the owner is not actively using the plane for anything else.
lomapaseo is offline  
Reply
Old 7th October 2013 | 15:01
  #858 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Aviation Qualifications: Non-Aircrew
Posts: 5,679
Likes: 3,341
From: Everett, WA
No way,

none of this "just in case" stuff when it comes to million dollar resources.

The investigators will be happy to continue a leisurely investigation only if the owner is not actively using the plane for anything else.
I take it you've never been involved in an air safety investigation. Getting an asset back into service is pretty low on their priority scale.
tdracer is offline  
Reply
Old 7th October 2013 | 16:00
  #859 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,609
Likes: 0
From: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Originally Posted by tdracer
I take it you've never been involved in an air safety investigation. Getting an asset back into service is pretty low on their priority scale.
I think he was being sarcastic.

maybe.
glad rag is offline  
Reply
Old 7th October 2013 | 19:34
  #860 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 1
From: Florida
Not being sarcastic.

It's one thing to have an active investigation with a timeline. Quite another to have a pseudo investigation with no time line when it comes to high value assets.

If you leave this open then you will quickly have no industry to investigate.

We may have different opinions but I see no data to support frozen high value assets without a time line.
lomapaseo is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.