Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Engineers & Technicians
Reload this Page >

Ethiopean 787 fire at Heathrow

Wikiposts
Search
Engineers & Technicians In this day and age of increased CRM and safety awareness, a forum for the guys and girls who keep our a/c serviceable.

Ethiopean 787 fire at Heathrow

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Jul 2013, 16:41
  #21 (permalink)  

ThRedBearOne
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Where my heart is.
Posts: 602
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It looks from the photo (and I realise that appearances can be deceptive) like a pretty minor event
But if it had happened in flight ... ?
ThreadBaron is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2013, 16:42
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Coventry
Age: 48
Posts: 1,946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
quite surprised that an airfield the size of LHR can't cope with that and still provide enough fire cover to at least keep one runway open.
Give them a break! When the alarm goes and the tenders are sent out, there isn't time to start asking if it is a little, medium of big fire.

I'm sure they will have everything back to normal as soon as is technically possible, positioning sectors from Luton are not good for anyone, nor are empty departure lounges.

One commentator already said fire not relating to previous 787 issues, but I wonder how much damage there is that can't be seen. Thankfully no injuries reported, but a hull loss so early on would not be good for the type.

Last edited by jabird; 12th Jul 2013 at 16:44.
jabird is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2013, 16:42
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 3,982
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
quite surprised that an airfield the size of LHR can't cope with that and still provide enough fire cover to at least keep one runway open.
Maybe other fire services attending another event on the airport (just suggesting)?
fireflybob is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2013, 16:43
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Manchester, UK
Age: 35
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thomson 788 G-TUIC has also just returned to Manchester nearly a quarter of the way enroute to Orlando with as yet unknown issue, the 787 has had some pretty bad days..
squarehole is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2013, 16:44
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 329
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BBC footage in last 10 mins clearly shows charring, possibly even fuse burn through on the fuse crown, immediately forward of the vertical fin.

The obvious question - are the batteries there or further back and lower down, nearer the APU?
OntimeexceptACARS is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2013, 16:44
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: SEA
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From what I understand, Boeing has said there has never been a 787 that has caught on fire before.

EDIT: Boeing stock immediately dropped 7%

Last edited by UAVop; 12th Jul 2013 at 16:49.
UAVop is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2013, 16:45
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: guernsey
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
R4 report Thomson say that the Manchester flight incident is unrelated to what has happened at Heathrow.

Burn marks not evident on starboard side:

http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/defau...130712_BA3.jpg

Last edited by kuningan; 12th Jul 2013 at 16:47.
kuningan is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2013, 16:46
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unbelievable!!!!! If I am not mistaken, Ethiopian conducted its own repairs on its 787 fleet and got them into the air the quickest of any airline.

Fingers crossed this does not shut down the 787 flying again....
Iver is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2013, 16:49
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Age: 79
Posts: 7,812
Received 137 Likes on 64 Posts
If that is hull damage from 'whatever fire' then:

1. 787 gets bad Press again.
2. I will not fly on one.
MPN11 is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2013, 16:49
  #30 (permalink)  

Dog Tired
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: uk
Posts: 1,688
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Looking at the damaged area (about 1-2 meters on the topside in front of the fin) and bearing in mind this is composite, how will they repair that?

Last edited by fantom; 12th Jul 2013 at 16:50.
fantom is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2013, 16:50
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I saw a fair few incidents in my time at Heathrow, including aircraft accidents, but I never saw the place closed. Bizarre.
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2013, 16:50
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 51
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It appears the damage is directly above the overhead crew rest cabin.
Redland is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2013, 16:51
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Fleet, UK
Age: 38
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
maybe a better pictures?

e195-001 is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2013, 16:51
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Age: 79
Posts: 7,812
Received 137 Likes on 64 Posts
It looks from the photo (and I realise that appearances can be deceptive) like a pretty minor event, quite surprised that an airfield the size of LHR can't cope with that and still provide enough fire cover to at least keep one runway open.
Have you ever read the requirements?

i haven't for years, but I doubt that LHR has the 300% cover you are imagining.
MPN11 is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2013, 16:54
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Altrincham
Age: 58
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Runways now open at Heathrow.
donnlass is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2013, 16:54
  #36 (permalink)  
I call you back
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Alpha quadrant
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anyone know if that is directly over the rear galley, forward of the rear galley or is there a rear galley on a 787? Thus possibly a galley fire?

You wouldn't expect batteries there in most other types but I have no idea for the 787.
Faire d'income is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2013, 16:56
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: London Whipsnade Wildlife Park
Posts: 5,039
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Grrr

The aircraft was reported to be either being prepared to be towed or had been towed.

Battery located in aft electronics bay wherever that is?

Last edited by Buster the Bear; 12th Jul 2013 at 16:58.
Buster the Bear is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2013, 16:56
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: in some mud
Age: 89
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is a difference between the airport being 'closed' and commerical airlines being unable to land or depart due to lack of fire cover.
General_Kirby is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2013, 16:57
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Here and there
Posts: 2,781
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Do ET have the rear crew rest loft fitted because the scorch marks would be about right if they do?
tubby linton is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2013, 16:57
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Cambridge
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
APU batteries are located in the in the aft eebay. There are no batteries at the fire location in the crown afaik
adriannicol is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.