Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Engineers & Technicians
Reload this Page >

767 Refuelling on RightWing

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Engineers & Technicians In this day and age of increased CRM and safety awareness, a forum for the guys and girls who keep our a/c serviceable.

767 Refuelling on RightWing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th December 2011 | 16:24
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 1,069
Likes: 129
From: Southern Shores of Old Lusitania Kingdom
Question 767 Refuelling on RightWing(Question)

Hi to all...throughout all these years of healthy 767 operations, one doubt remains on my mind.
Why does the 767 only have refuelling points on its left wing, and no point to do so at right one?
I remember on the very early 80's days here on the southerly and sunny mediterranean destinations, lots of puzzles and brainstorms by the airport authorities and parking/marshalling management, whenever the oldie 762 of Britannia came here.
In some cases it was a really mess, specially on small sunny aprons, where it was parked almost "backwards", with lots of imagination and good-will improvise.
Does anyone knows if along these years, any 767 was already constructed without that restriction, all remains the same, and the main reason for that?
Sorry if was already asked here, but so far, none results on my searches. Tanx

Last edited by JanetFlight; 28th December 2011 at 19:11.
JanetFlight is offline  
Reply
Old 28th December 2011 | 20:19
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
From: nowhere and everywhere
maybe just wonder yourself:
what about tanks capacities ?
what about ground times ?
whats the point of having two refuelling points ?
just my two cents ...
MATMAX is offline  
Reply
Old 28th December 2011 | 20:33
  #3 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Aviation Qualifications: Spotter
Posts: 2,143
Likes: 4
From: EGGW
An option exists on the B767 to have an additional refuel point on the other wing.
I have no idea if anybody has this operation installed.
Mr @ Spotty M is offline  
Reply
Old 29th December 2011 | 00:33
  #4 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 149
Likes: 2
From: Oran
Catering

I think the ground handling of the other services, Catering, LD's etc is why the left wing is used.

I flew a 767 with dual fuelling using left and right wings. Was a real mess when the left wing control panel was faulty, and we used the right wing to fuel.
icemanalgeria is offline  
Reply
Old 29th December 2011 | 01:17
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
From: AUSTRALIA
I believe all British Airways B767's have left & right refueling as an option,with the control panel still on the left wing.

I was told that this option was taken because of the many Eastern European airports that BA operates to, where refueling from underground was available on the right only. And that may have been a hangup from the Cold War era,of both sides doing things differently, and to make their equipment incompatible.
Long Bay Mauler is offline  
Reply
Old 29th December 2011 | 04:38
  #6 (permalink)  
50 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 668
Likes: 0
From: Adelaide
What side does all the baggage handling take place on ? There is your answer - designed for a " quick " turnaround, maximising access whilst allowing the tanker an emergency egress path.
SeldomFixit is offline  
Reply
Old 29th December 2011 | 09:30
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 569
Likes: 0
From: Stockholm Sweden
The British Airways fleet of B767s have a pair of refuel couplings on each wing.
They also have a complete refuel panel on each wing.
The left panel is the master if both doors are open, but with the left wing refuel panel closed, the right refuel control panel works as normal.

I understand this was a mistake during the ordering process. The intention was to order the optional refuel connections on the right wing, but a complete panel was ordered instead. This caused confusion at Boeings, because although the option was in the book, they had not designed it yet!

Qatar Airways also has trouble with refuel connectors. Their A320 fleet only have a single connecttion on the right wing, and nothing on the left.
Also about 5 of their A330-300 have no connections on the left wing. The panel is fitted, and the decal that says how much psi the fuel pressure should be, but open the panel and it is empty inside.
So all refuelling of QR Airbus is done on the right side.
Swedish Steve is offline  
Reply
Old 29th December 2011 | 19:22
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 1,069
Likes: 129
From: Southern Shores of Old Lusitania Kingdom
Tanx to all
JanetFlight is offline  
Reply
Old 30th December 2011 | 06:05
  #9 (permalink)  
rmm
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
From: BNE
While where on the topic, why did they use the RHS on the 737? It's fairly congested on the RHS during a turnaround especially on a classic. A LHS fuelling panel would have made more sense.
rmm is offline  
Reply
Old 30th December 2011 | 12:32
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
From: nowhere and everywhere
Am i the only one to think that "operations" are managed around the aircraft and not the aircraft to be built as things used to be done ...?
MATMAX is offline  
Reply
Old 30th December 2011 | 15:19
  #11 (permalink)  
Thought police antagonist
Community Builder
Community Influencer
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Aviation Qualifications: LAME
Posts: 1,574
Likes: 349
From: Where I always have been...firmly in the real world
The thread reminds me of a genuine CDL entry c/o a well known,but now defunct, charter outfit..

" Could the engineers move the re-fuel position to the right wing as the one on the left wing slows down boarding pax " .

Bless.....
Krystal n chips is online now  
Reply
Old 31st December 2011 | 01:37
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
From: UK
The point of two refuel points on a B744 is clear. Loading 160 tonnes of fuel, as we do daily, with one would take forever.
Terry McCassey is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.