Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Engineers & Technicians
Reload this Page >

Radiation of fighters and engines.

Wikiposts
Search
Engineers & Technicians In this day and age of increased CRM and safety awareness, a forum for the guys and girls who keep our a/c serviceable.

Radiation of fighters and engines.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Nov 2010, 18:29
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Radiation of fighters and engines.

Hi there,

The Dutch airforce is calling back several a/c and engines from training facilities due to radiation and presence of asbestos.
It concerns the F-104, F-5 and their engines.
Does anyone know if the J-65 engines have asbestos present or if the radiation level of the used materials is of any concern?
I have three J-65's in my classroom for training purposes.

Please your answer.
MisterBliss is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2010, 21:39
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Anglia
Posts: 2,076
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Wow!....Are the Neddys still flying F104s?


...or are they checking the ones in Museums?
Rigga is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2010, 21:49
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts


Italy and Thailand were the last countries to fly the 104....
In Holland we only have them for training purposes left, yes our school sometimes looks like a museum
MisterBliss is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2010, 21:56
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Older Turbine Engines

In older turbine engines it is not uncommon for some of the bigger non-ferrous alloy parts (like the metals used for inlet housings and accessory gearboxes) to have a bit of latent radiation.

Enough that when shipping them a special note has to be attached because radiation sensors will go off.

Asbestos was (and sometimes still is) common in clamps and component seals.
MLHeliwrench is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2010, 22:07
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That is what the Airforce told us yesterday.
We had to seal of some cockpits and even closed the engine shop till further notice.
The newspapers tell us that they are getting the aircraft and engines back, strange enough, when I was a student at our school for twenty years ago, I had to work on and with them as well....

Only thing I want to know if it is safe enough for my students to practice on them.

In my stores I do have some older seals and clamps containing asbestos, they are sealed and not for (re-) use.
If there is same radiation to be found, they are going to do some tests on monday, than I have to seal or remove the engines, that will be a pity.
MisterBliss is offline  
Old 28th Nov 2010, 00:01
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: At home
Posts: 1,233
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Some possibilities:
  • Not quite depleted uranium mass balance weights
  • Instrument faces and needles painted with radioactive radium 'glow in the dark' paint Radium dials - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  • Insulation blankets, brake pads, gaskets and even polysulphide (PR1422a) tank sealant pre 1990s could all contain asbestos.
  • Mercury switches, or any other mercury containing parts.
Provided the students don't start pulling apart insulation blankets, blowing the dust off panels which have been near them, or wirebrushing brake parts, I would have thought the risks were minimal. Production workers exposed to the same parts day in, day out and the dust or residue from manufacturing processes are the ones likely to be at risk. Removing engines etc, in my opinion, is far more likely to raise dust and creat a hazard than just carrying on as before.
Mechta is offline  
Old 2nd Dec 2010, 05:42
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: kuwait
Age: 55
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
J-65 engines

Hi,I am a licensed aircarft engineer on commercial aircrafts B727 with PW JT8D, & B757/767/777. The maintenance manual states any safety procuations associated with any sensors which use radioacive material, for example the ionisation type smoke detectors which some aircraft use.The radiation amount is virtually negligent and within specified limits which have no health risk.
Now a days, radioactive materials are used to treat cancer patient and also used in medicine for artery blockage and so many good uses. So people should not be affraid when they hear Radiation becuase even human body produces radiation during potassuim digestion process. The amount,power and the duration is the mean factor.
You stated that J-65 engines used some radiation materials which have a bit latent radiation.Do you mean it has a negligent radiation?
I have never worked on J-65 engine but would like to know if it is within safe limit is it of any concern ?
You stated that J-65 when shipping them, special note has to be attached becuase Radiation sensors will go off ! Could you explain more, what are they ( Radiation sensors) ?
Many thanks
M.J. Behbahani is offline  
Old 2nd Dec 2010, 08:22
  #8 (permalink)  
Cunning Artificer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The spiritual home of DeHavilland
Age: 76
Posts: 3,127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One used to happily wrap the thermocouple wiring on the Vulcan with the asbestos tape supplied in rolls for the purpose and the engine bay wiring was a mass of asbestos covered 'P' Clips. Then there were the asbestos fire gloves stowed in the cabin for crew use. Meanwhile, back in the calibration room, poor old Sam who repainted the instrument dials had teeth that glowed in the dark. (And don't even mention the radiation hanging about in a QRA aircraft bomb bay. Shhh!")
Blacksheep is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.