Monarch luton
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: oop north
Age: 54
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It was only a few momths ago they made a lot of guys redundant at MAN and LGW and then had to take on connies on to fill the gaps , i see MTS are actually looking for people at MAN and LTN at present, seems strange
Monarch Technical Support
Monarch Technical Support
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: EGGW
Posts: 2,112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I can answer that question.
The people MTS are after, are not for MAEL at Luton.
All the hangars are at max capacity at the moment with all the work going on.
The problem is from May onwards.
The people MTS are after, are not for MAEL at Luton.
All the hangars are at max capacity at the moment with all the work going on.
The problem is from May onwards.
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Who said anything about going down the pan smudge?? SR Technics recently closed a maintenance facility in DUB and STN with the loss of hundreds of jobs. Are they going down the pan?? No, they are still trading and will continue to do so. MAEL as good as they are are not immune from the effects of the global recession. In the past when times were good MRO's (MAEL included) got away with charging the 'going rate' because the work was always there and airlines were making plenty of money. However, the current downturn has forced operators to take drastic measures as they struggle to survive and this includes getting maintenance done abroad where it can be had on the cheap. Quality does not come into the equation as the bean counters are only interested in meeting the minimum legislative requirements by getting a stamp in the book.
UK based MRO's cost bases are too high at present and they just cannot compete with the third party organisations in Europe and Asia who employ Tom, Dick and Harry off the streets and pay them peanuts. MAEL are having to cut costs and streamline their operation in order to safeguard a future. Work is scarce at the moment and if you are not in a position to put in realistic bids because your overheads are too high then it doesn't take a rocket scientist to work out that you need to make savings to become competitive again. MAEL have an excellent reputation and employ some of the best people in the business. I'd be very surprised if they were to go down the pan and no doubt they'll be around to cash in on the upturn as and when it comes.
UK based MRO's cost bases are too high at present and they just cannot compete with the third party organisations in Europe and Asia who employ Tom, Dick and Harry off the streets and pay them peanuts. MAEL are having to cut costs and streamline their operation in order to safeguard a future. Work is scarce at the moment and if you are not in a position to put in realistic bids because your overheads are too high then it doesn't take a rocket scientist to work out that you need to make savings to become competitive again. MAEL have an excellent reputation and employ some of the best people in the business. I'd be very surprised if they were to go down the pan and no doubt they'll be around to cash in on the upturn as and when it comes.
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Quahog
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
MAEL are certainly not going down the pan but it's not rocket science - if you can buy heavy maintenance at 50% less per hour overseas and your parent company is suffering in the recession (as we all are) you're going to find it attractive aren't you? Why pay the costs of engineers and hangars all year when you only fully use them for a few months a year? The costs of ferry flights mean this is mostly likely to affect heavy maintenance. I think you'll find in months and years to come more and more MROs in this country will restrict themselves to light/line work.
And don't be too quick to condemn foreign standards of work either. Just because local wages allow them to work for less money doesn't mean they don't know what they're doing.
I do think it's a sad development, if unsurprising. It's the way of the world now I'm afraid and you needn't expect it to change.
And don't be too quick to condemn foreign standards of work either. Just because local wages allow them to work for less money doesn't mean they don't know what they're doing.
I do think it's a sad development, if unsurprising. It's the way of the world now I'm afraid and you needn't expect it to change.
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: U.K.
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[dodo56[/quote]And don't be too quick to condemn foreign standards of work either. Just because local wages allow them to work for less money doesn't mean they don't know what they're doing.[dodo56][/quote]
Your statement is not entirely true, Sure local wages are based on domestic legislations. However its not only the 50% wage arbitration that a bean counter has to take into consideration.
Most airlines the likes of Easy et al will have a ontime penalty clause, a daily delay will result in fine of £25k/day, the productivity of these new MRO's are far from desirable to achieve the tight downtimes stipulated by the airline bean counters. It takes nearly 10yrs to get past the learning curve, most of the heavy maint personell in U.K/Ireland are from the defense or Manf background which makes these org efficient.
I believe the availability of Captive facility alongside highly skilled manpower in U.K. will result in some of the more dynamic org ( read Easy, Ryanair) Putting work thru these org, albeit at lower man-hr rates further eroding the wage arbitration the E.Eu MROs have at the moment.
Infact Easy is now schd work at Dublin as ATC is getting busy.
Your statement is not entirely true, Sure local wages are based on domestic legislations. However its not only the 50% wage arbitration that a bean counter has to take into consideration.
Most airlines the likes of Easy et al will have a ontime penalty clause, a daily delay will result in fine of £25k/day, the productivity of these new MRO's are far from desirable to achieve the tight downtimes stipulated by the airline bean counters. It takes nearly 10yrs to get past the learning curve, most of the heavy maint personell in U.K/Ireland are from the defense or Manf background which makes these org efficient.
I believe the availability of Captive facility alongside highly skilled manpower in U.K. will result in some of the more dynamic org ( read Easy, Ryanair) Putting work thru these org, albeit at lower man-hr rates further eroding the wage arbitration the E.Eu MROs have at the moment.
Infact Easy is now schd work at Dublin as ATC is getting busy.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: oop north
Age: 54
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
EGT, no doubt about it monarch are a top maintenance provider, however no matter how good they are when it comes to heavy maint how the hell can they compete with for eg eastern european MRO,s who are paying their staff a fraction of uk rates? , labour is a huge chunk of the bill so with the best will in the world western european providers are at a huge disadvantage here .
Cunning Artificer
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The spiritual home of DeHavilland
Age: 76
Posts: 3,127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So, if the eastern europeans have so much spare cheap labour lying about unused, tell me why the nice lady at the Agency phoned me at my desk here in Luton and asked if I was interested in a job in eastern europe where they were short of people with my skills? The pay would have been more than I get right now, here in "High Labour Rate" UK. I must admit,I was tempted.... for a couple of seconds or so.
Eastern european maintenance providers may be snapping up the contracts with fantastic low labour rates and impossibly optimistic down times (e.g. 4 days for a B757 "C" Check!) but then they're out in the market looking for people with "your kind of skills" in order to deliver what they've promised. One wonders how long they can keep such tactics up?
Eastern european maintenance providers may be snapping up the contracts with fantastic low labour rates and impossibly optimistic down times (e.g. 4 days for a B757 "C" Check!) but then they're out in the market looking for people with "your kind of skills" in order to deliver what they've promised. One wonders how long they can keep such tactics up?
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Quahog
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Jethrotull and Blacksheep, you make fair points. But the proof of the pudding is in the safe-on-time departure of the aircraft (to coin an awful mixed metaphor). I know of western european airlines who are outsourcing their heavy work eastwards at considerably lower manhour rates and have been happy with the service and standards.
Remember engineers rates are not the whole story. For every licensed guy you can have a number of experienced but unlicensed spanners, and the eastern guys are not short of those. Also the fully absorbed manhour cost rate is typically more than double the individual's pay rate because the overheads of the hangar and the support staff have to be covered. With low overheads and high volume throughput (the Ryanair model, if you like) you can afford to take on some licensed guys at (relatively) high cost to keep your licensed/unlicensed ratio sensible, and enable the volume throughput to cover overheads over a wider cost base.
I doubt this will spell the complete end of heavy maintenance in the UK though. From an MRO's POV they need to keep enough people, skills and approvals to keep the line supported during the main flying season. These people can be deployed on heavies in the low season, but maybe not for the entire fleet as the requirements for manpower will be in excess of what the organisation can supply from its core staff. The likes of MAEL always used to supplement their workforce with connies at these times but it's an expensive way to buy peak labour and the required hangar space, empty for half the year, is also a big cost drain. Their choice shouldn't be too much of a surprise.
Remember engineers rates are not the whole story. For every licensed guy you can have a number of experienced but unlicensed spanners, and the eastern guys are not short of those. Also the fully absorbed manhour cost rate is typically more than double the individual's pay rate because the overheads of the hangar and the support staff have to be covered. With low overheads and high volume throughput (the Ryanair model, if you like) you can afford to take on some licensed guys at (relatively) high cost to keep your licensed/unlicensed ratio sensible, and enable the volume throughput to cover overheads over a wider cost base.
I doubt this will spell the complete end of heavy maintenance in the UK though. From an MRO's POV they need to keep enough people, skills and approvals to keep the line supported during the main flying season. These people can be deployed on heavies in the low season, but maybe not for the entire fleet as the requirements for manpower will be in excess of what the organisation can supply from its core staff. The likes of MAEL always used to supplement their workforce with connies at these times but it's an expensive way to buy peak labour and the required hangar space, empty for half the year, is also a big cost drain. Their choice shouldn't be too much of a surprise.
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: U.K.
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dodo56,
The more experienced E.Eu techs are working in W.Eu. Its a natural human tendency to seek better pastures, especially once you have eastablished yourself.
The same will also happen with the staff at these E.Eu MROs. Once they have adequate exp they will demand better wages and bear this in mind that most have a communist background read unionised.
I had met a airline Engg exec from MANH in Dec at a E.Eu MRO in Dec, his words were ''Now i am satisfactorily assured to bring my aircrafts here, having seen you all working for this MRO''. This statement speaks a lot with ref to the decision to go E.Eu. The fears of quality have not subsided as yet.
The more experienced E.Eu techs are working in W.Eu. Its a natural human tendency to seek better pastures, especially once you have eastablished yourself.
The same will also happen with the staff at these E.Eu MROs. Once they have adequate exp they will demand better wages and bear this in mind that most have a communist background read unionised.
I had met a airline Engg exec from MANH in Dec at a E.Eu MRO in Dec, his words were ''Now i am satisfactorily assured to bring my aircrafts here, having seen you all working for this MRO''. This statement speaks a lot with ref to the decision to go E.Eu. The fears of quality have not subsided as yet.
Cunning Artificer
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The spiritual home of DeHavilland
Age: 76
Posts: 3,127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
because the overheads of the hangar and the support staff
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: london
Age: 59
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Monarch had better make sure they handle this round of job cuts a little more carefully than the last ,i hear the ALAE has just won one of the cases brought against them for unfair dismissal
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: luton
Age: 44
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Great news, read it today in this months tech log, it might just make monarch realise there not above the law and if the choose to behave in the way they did there is financial consequences to be faced as well as very bad company publicity, well done to the ALAE team involved