Ex Forces? Full Pension? Watch out!!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: yorkshire
Age: 46
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ex Forces? Full Pension? Watch out!!!
I am new to this site and thought I would start off with a quick rant! I am about to embark on my B2 self study adventure.Mainly due to the poor wages on offer as a permy mech fitter (21 to 29k on average). I have been out of the RAF for a number of years now and am sick to my back teeth of these companies who rely on a local pool of ex-forces techs who have a full pension and want a job on their doorstep. Wake up! They are using your penson, something you have worked 22 yrs for, away from your family and in dangerous countries to subsidise a quite shocking rate of pay. These companies are taking advantage of you. A girl who checks in baggage where I work earns more than a mech working for Serco or Vosper Thornycroft!!! Who has more responsibility??? Shocking, and by letting them get away with it, you are as to blame as them. Do you think one day they are going to wake up and realise they are ripping you off? They know that already. 
Just Say NO!!
Just Say NO!!
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: uk
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Say No will not force up the wages paid to mechanics. There will always be people prepared to take a lower wage and maybe support it with their pensions. It is an individual choice. Good luck with you self study, as it takes alot of time effort and motivation, but is worth it.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: yorkshire
Age: 46
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ah...turboprop, you just burst my bubble, i am trying to start a revolution here mate!!!
Ah well, it just annoys me though.Especially when the very people who accept these pennies whinge about it.
Thankyou for the good luck.
Ah well, it just annoys me though.Especially when the very people who accept these pennies whinge about it.
Thankyou for the good luck.
Cunning Artificer
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The spiritual home of DeHavilland
Age: 76
Posts: 3,127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When I left the mob I always wondered who would be stupid enough to work for any of those rip-off companies. At Heathrow the ex-RAF Chiefy I worked with was making the same wage as me plus his RAF pension on top. Thats only fair, seeing as how I bailed out after just 12 years and he'd sacrificed ten years of civilian pay and conditions to gain that pension.
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Secret airbase in scotland
Age: 35
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
People complain about only getting £29-£30k but if your wages go up then so do the services then do other things along the line so we get paid more then other things go up which in turn drive prices up along the ling.
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Behind a dusty desk, and in some really hot, dusty, wet and cold places subject to who is paying the bill. But mostly Gods own land.
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Funkeymonkey77, I don't think Turboprop burst your bubble, I think you kind of did that yourself.
You have just hit the nail on the head when you said you were taking your trade exams, that's the answer, the way out of the penury situation.
I’ve said this before on another thread, but I get really frustrated when I hear fitters complain about poor standards of pay and how badly done too they are, I particularly find it hard to listen to ex-forces chaps who seem to think that the commercial aviation market should pay them for the time they did in the military.
I’m not anti fitters, hell the industry couldn’t survive without them, and yes there are some guys who just simply don’t want to be a licensed engineer, well that’s fine, but it’s hardly cricket to expect licensed engineers money when you haven’t sat the license exams and got your ticket.
I’m like the majority of licensed engineers I know, I was in the military and I sat my exams before I left in preparation for entering the commercial workplace.
Where I work now there is only one licensed guy who hasn’t come from a military back-ground and a heap of fitters who have never done military time.
As engineers we have for years been saying that there will be a major shortage of license coverage well that time is now, even with the unfortunate redundancies due to the current global financial crisis the vast majority of guys will be able to gain new employment, unfortunately it may entail moving home, but non the less they should be able to gain a new position.
So what’s with complaining that you’re being taken advantage off? It’s only because a company took the chance on you, an unlicensed ex-forces chap that you’re even able to be in a position to get the commercial experience necessary to sit your trade papers. Play fair it’s hardly exploitation is it?
So to summaries, right at this moment, you’re employed by a company which gives you the commercial experience necessary to get a full, un-restricted license and when you get that license you’re going to be in a market-place where there is a demand for licensed engineers and the pay is probably substantially more than a fitters pay…
So what really is the problem?
Is it just that you think that after however many years in the military that the commercial sector should just pay you heaps of money because you’re a 22year ex-military chap?
I think your attitude is bloody selfish, taken advantage off because you have a pension… guess there are no fitters at your place that have never been in the forces and have pensions to top up their salaries, your not complaining on their behalf are you, your not complaining that fitters salaries are poor in general, no your complaining because the commercial sector hasn’t patted you on the head and kissed your arse for your military service.
You go talk to the girl at the check-in desk and ask her if for a few exams on her job she can get anything from a 50%-100% pay rise? And you go look your non-military fitter colleagues in the eye and tell them your badly done too when you get however much in pension more a month than they do. And you ask some of the poor souls who are in there late 40's early 50's who are loosing their jobs due to the current economic climate who are really going to struggle to get another job because of their age, when we in aviation engineering have an average age in the late 50’s…
You’re so badly done too…
You have just hit the nail on the head when you said you were taking your trade exams, that's the answer, the way out of the penury situation.
I’ve said this before on another thread, but I get really frustrated when I hear fitters complain about poor standards of pay and how badly done too they are, I particularly find it hard to listen to ex-forces chaps who seem to think that the commercial aviation market should pay them for the time they did in the military.
I’m not anti fitters, hell the industry couldn’t survive without them, and yes there are some guys who just simply don’t want to be a licensed engineer, well that’s fine, but it’s hardly cricket to expect licensed engineers money when you haven’t sat the license exams and got your ticket.
I’m like the majority of licensed engineers I know, I was in the military and I sat my exams before I left in preparation for entering the commercial workplace.
Where I work now there is only one licensed guy who hasn’t come from a military back-ground and a heap of fitters who have never done military time.
As engineers we have for years been saying that there will be a major shortage of license coverage well that time is now, even with the unfortunate redundancies due to the current global financial crisis the vast majority of guys will be able to gain new employment, unfortunately it may entail moving home, but non the less they should be able to gain a new position.
So what’s with complaining that you’re being taken advantage off? It’s only because a company took the chance on you, an unlicensed ex-forces chap that you’re even able to be in a position to get the commercial experience necessary to sit your trade papers. Play fair it’s hardly exploitation is it?
So to summaries, right at this moment, you’re employed by a company which gives you the commercial experience necessary to get a full, un-restricted license and when you get that license you’re going to be in a market-place where there is a demand for licensed engineers and the pay is probably substantially more than a fitters pay…
So what really is the problem?
Is it just that you think that after however many years in the military that the commercial sector should just pay you heaps of money because you’re a 22year ex-military chap?
I think your attitude is bloody selfish, taken advantage off because you have a pension… guess there are no fitters at your place that have never been in the forces and have pensions to top up their salaries, your not complaining on their behalf are you, your not complaining that fitters salaries are poor in general, no your complaining because the commercial sector hasn’t patted you on the head and kissed your arse for your military service.
You go talk to the girl at the check-in desk and ask her if for a few exams on her job she can get anything from a 50%-100% pay rise? And you go look your non-military fitter colleagues in the eye and tell them your badly done too when you get however much in pension more a month than they do. And you ask some of the poor souls who are in there late 40's early 50's who are loosing their jobs due to the current economic climate who are really going to struggle to get another job because of their age, when we in aviation engineering have an average age in the late 50’s…
You’re so badly done too…
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sweden
Age: 56
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
@ Miles Gustaph
I cannot find anything in Funkymonkeys post that suggests he has a pension and is demanding that the civvy world gives him more. The point that he is making is that the 22 year guys taking on these jobs for 18k and topping up their income with pensions are artifically deflating the wages for those who don't have pensions. In an ideal world these guys would say no, demand a living wage and keep their pensions for the fun things in life, not use them to supplement sub-standard wages.
I cannot find anything in Funkymonkeys post that suggests he has a pension and is demanding that the civvy world gives him more. The point that he is making is that the 22 year guys taking on these jobs for 18k and topping up their income with pensions are artifically deflating the wages for those who don't have pensions. In an ideal world these guys would say no, demand a living wage and keep their pensions for the fun things in life, not use them to supplement sub-standard wages.
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Behind a dusty desk, and in some really hot, dusty, wet and cold places subject to who is paying the bill. But mostly Gods own land.
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dual Ground,
“22 year guys taking on these jobs for 18k and topping up their income with pensions are artificially deflating the wages for those who don't have pensions”
How many people do you think do 22 years in the military, and how many do you think that enter the industry to enable them to result in “deflating the wages for those who don't have pensions”?
I’m sorry but the bitter attitude of ex-forces people thinking they are being exploited because of their pensions isn’t the case at all. It’s because while they may be experienced they are not qualified just like any other fitter in the industry.
No matter how experienced you are in this industry it inevitably boils down to what piece of paper you hold, no piece of paper = lower pay.
Come on how many industries have the opportunity to better yourself like ours, yet there are people such as Funkymonkey complaining that they are exploited…
“22 year guys taking on these jobs for 18k and topping up their income with pensions are artificially deflating the wages for those who don't have pensions”
How many people do you think do 22 years in the military, and how many do you think that enter the industry to enable them to result in “deflating the wages for those who don't have pensions”?
I’m sorry but the bitter attitude of ex-forces people thinking they are being exploited because of their pensions isn’t the case at all. It’s because while they may be experienced they are not qualified just like any other fitter in the industry.
No matter how experienced you are in this industry it inevitably boils down to what piece of paper you hold, no piece of paper = lower pay.
Come on how many industries have the opportunity to better yourself like ours, yet there are people such as Funkymonkey complaining that they are exploited…
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: yorkshire
Age: 46
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Calm dowm Miles!!
For your information, I only did 9 yrs service so no pensiion for me anyway. I am not whinging about being exploited as I am not being exploited. I would not allow it! But these companies ARE exploiting ex forces personnel, Serco know for instance that there is a number of ex forces with full pensions on there door step at wattisham. They know many are settled with a good pension. They simply dont need to try and attract people as they are already there. I just think in this industry we are worth a bit more!
Fitters in Aberdeen are on 28+, let serco or VT go up there and start offering their attractive package around!
I am studying now for a better wage in a perm job, more opportunities, and a more stable career.
For your information, I only did 9 yrs service so no pensiion for me anyway. I am not whinging about being exploited as I am not being exploited. I would not allow it! But these companies ARE exploiting ex forces personnel, Serco know for instance that there is a number of ex forces with full pensions on there door step at wattisham. They know many are settled with a good pension. They simply dont need to try and attract people as they are already there. I just think in this industry we are worth a bit more!
Fitters in Aberdeen are on 28+, let serco or VT go up there and start offering their attractive package around!
I am studying now for a better wage in a perm job, more opportunities, and a more stable career.
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: UK
Age: 57
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ha haa,
I did my 12then did my licenses and have been making decent money for a good while so I can understand what you're on about.
On the one hand - the old RAF lads are mugs for staying in their comfort zones and working for sh1t wages but look at the other side too mate....
How much would you want to pay some old burnt out tea swilling comfort zone dwelling ex chief who's been off the tools forever and shuffles round a hangar with his pipe and slippers moaning all day?
I did my 12then did my licenses and have been making decent money for a good while so I can understand what you're on about.
On the one hand - the old RAF lads are mugs for staying in their comfort zones and working for sh1t wages but look at the other side too mate....
How much would you want to pay some old burnt out tea swilling comfort zone dwelling ex chief who's been off the tools forever and shuffles round a hangar with his pipe and slippers moaning all day?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: yorkshire
Age: 46
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'How much would you want to pay some old burnt out tea swilling comfort zone dwelling ex chief who's been off the tools forever and shuffles round a hangar with his pipe and slippers moaning all day'
Exactly vort, but that is all they will ever get with what they offer!...I simply could not afford to get by on that money.....its a vicious circle as they say!
Anyhow, onwards and upwards!
Exactly vort, but that is all they will ever get with what they offer!...I simply could not afford to get by on that money.....its a vicious circle as they say!
Anyhow, onwards and upwards!
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How much would you want to pay some old burnt out tea swilling comfort zone dwelling ex chief who's been off the tools forever and shuffles round a hangar with his pipe and slippers moaning all day?
Now that is funny…..
One of the biggest hurdles ex forces guys face when leaving the services is often their own doing. Their attitudes and expectations are often unrealistic. Far too many believe the world owes them a favour and some simply think they can carry on where they left off. During my time in the RAF I worked with a fair number of Sgt’s and C/T’s who begrudged having to study for a licence and thought they should be given one gratis just because they've spent 22 years in the forces. I used to say to these guys that if you are as good as you think you are then why not leave and take your chances out in the real world. Strangely enough they elect to stay in, that old comfort zone where they can hide behind rank pretending to be important is not that easy to give up!!
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm with you FunkyMonkey
As a civilian who has worked directly with service personnel for nineteen years, I observed exactly the same when the RAAF went through their Commercial Support Program some time back. (To reduce costs, you replace a service person with a civilian and pay his company three times the salary paid to the service person.)
Personnel who were essentially redundant were offered sh#t postings or could take a position with the successful contractor at a salary that was reduced to take into account their pension benefits. Now I don't agree with the other (civvy) contributors to this thread about whinging service personnel.Why the H*LL should the pension of a serviceman (or to be PC servicewoman) be deliberately used to add to the profit margin of the company employing them? The solution in OZ was to align service training and qualifications with civilian equivalents so that people left with that important piece of paper. (In some cases, that resulted in a lower standard of training and reduced competencies!) Even then the employers still reduced their pay offers to account for their pensions.
The military pension is intended to compensate for crap hours, terrible sub-standard accommodation, family disruption, separation for extended periods and carrying the continual risk of stopping the odd bullet. It definitely is not intended to reduce pay rates on separation.
Go get them, Funky!
Myself? I've retired and have my own comfortable pension.
Blax
Personnel who were essentially redundant were offered sh#t postings or could take a position with the successful contractor at a salary that was reduced to take into account their pension benefits. Now I don't agree with the other (civvy) contributors to this thread about whinging service personnel.
Why the H*LL should the pension of a serviceman (or to be PC servicewoman) be deliberately used to add to the profit margin of the company employing them? The solution in OZ was to align service training and qualifications with civilian equivalents so that people left with that important piece of paper. (In some cases, that resulted in a lower standard of training and reduced competencies!) Even then the employers still reduced their pay offers to account for their pensions. The military pension is intended to compensate for crap hours, terrible sub-standard accommodation, family disruption, separation for extended periods and carrying the continual risk of stopping the odd bullet. It definitely is not intended to reduce pay rates on separation.
Go get them, Funky!
Myself? I've retired and have my own comfortable pension.
Blax
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: South West
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Basic economics, the companies will pay what the market will accept.
If guys coming out of the RAF (or RN or AAC) want to stay close to where there family is settled (eg Wattisham, Leuchars, etc.) and a job comes up that pays, say, £25K and they do there sums (wage + pension - outgoings = enough) then they are entitled to take it.
Some people may not like what they see as "exploitation" but is a business in the civvie world and if a company can employ the calibre of people they want, where they are needed at a wage they are prepared to accept then good on them. It's a free world.
If guys coming out of the RAF (or RN or AAC) want to stay close to where there family is settled (eg Wattisham, Leuchars, etc.) and a job comes up that pays, say, £25K and they do there sums (wage + pension - outgoings = enough) then they are entitled to take it.
Some people may not like what they see as "exploitation" but is a business in the civvie world and if a company can employ the calibre of people they want, where they are needed at a wage they are prepared to accept then good on them. It's a free world.
Last edited by Sonic Bam; 26th Mar 2009 at 06:01.
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sweden
Age: 56
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I posted a reply in this thread 10 hours ago, and it would appear to still be in a queue for moderation. All I did was cut and paste into it, is that an automatic visit to the mods or is it just because I haven't posted on here much? 
Thought police antagonist
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Where I always have been...firmly in the real world
Posts: 1,372
Received 118 Likes
on
85 Posts
There is nothing new about the pension / salary remuneration in the civilian world. Pre Serco / VT there was a well known and well trodden path to a company called Airworks who did precisely this and many ex Forces people joined the organisation.
The airline world has always been a different environment however due to the Licenced / mech / tech divide ( hence the reason Airworks were so popular...same work as the RAF / Navy...but no licence required ) and therein lies but one of the issues for those wishing to make the transition back to civilian life. The perception of many in the RAF is that a Licence= £££'s....which, to be fair, it can....eventually... when you get all your approvals / type ratings plus shift pay etc. Many seem to ignore the little matter of gaining civilian experience first. The actual hands on aspect is the same, but the part which many ex mil.people struggle with is the psychological transition eg, the exposure to civilian commercial pressures and, how shall I put this, "practices" which, at times, as we all know are not entirely "IAW". Then there is the aspect of simply being one of many and no longer having the status / infrastructure of the Mil / Mess / Station to support them. For many, this proves difficult to overcome as does the loss of rank / authority which they were used to.
That said, most ex mil people are invaluable to the beancounting community because of their ability and capability to "get things done"....irrespective of the ideology imposed by management.
The choice is entirely up to the individual concerned therefore as to how he / she makes the transition and wishes to develop themselves thereafter. Nobody else.
The airline world has always been a different environment however due to the Licenced / mech / tech divide ( hence the reason Airworks were so popular...same work as the RAF / Navy...but no licence required ) and therein lies but one of the issues for those wishing to make the transition back to civilian life. The perception of many in the RAF is that a Licence= £££'s....which, to be fair, it can....eventually... when you get all your approvals / type ratings plus shift pay etc. Many seem to ignore the little matter of gaining civilian experience first. The actual hands on aspect is the same, but the part which many ex mil.people struggle with is the psychological transition eg, the exposure to civilian commercial pressures and, how shall I put this, "practices" which, at times, as we all know are not entirely "IAW". Then there is the aspect of simply being one of many and no longer having the status / infrastructure of the Mil / Mess / Station to support them. For many, this proves difficult to overcome as does the loss of rank / authority which they were used to.
That said, most ex mil people are invaluable to the beancounting community because of their ability and capability to "get things done"....irrespective of the ideology imposed by management.
The choice is entirely up to the individual concerned therefore as to how he / she makes the transition and wishes to develop themselves thereafter. Nobody else.
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sweden
Age: 56
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OK, I have given up on the mods now. I will type the salient details from the advert which I tried to cut and paste into my missing post.
Last year on AJS an advert appeared for time served aircraft electricians and also time served vehicle mechanics, in different locations in the UK. Aircraft work in Hampshire, vehicle work in Wales in the Brecon area. Both posts required apprenticeship papers. The aircraft work was on Chinooks, the vehicle work on military and commercial vehicles. Both were I think you will agree military contracts.
Rate of pay per hour was aircraft lecky 11.48 PAYE. The vehicle fitter was 12.48 PAYE.
Now is anyone prepared to defend a situation where aircraft fitters get paid less than vehicle fitters?
And that Miles, is the kind of situation that Funky and I are not impresssed about. Or maybe you think that 11.48 is a reasonable wage for someone who does not have "the right bit of paper"?
Last year on AJS an advert appeared for time served aircraft electricians and also time served vehicle mechanics, in different locations in the UK. Aircraft work in Hampshire, vehicle work in Wales in the Brecon area. Both posts required apprenticeship papers. The aircraft work was on Chinooks, the vehicle work on military and commercial vehicles. Both were I think you will agree military contracts.
Rate of pay per hour was aircraft lecky 11.48 PAYE. The vehicle fitter was 12.48 PAYE.
Now is anyone prepared to defend a situation where aircraft fitters get paid less than vehicle fitters?
And that Miles, is the kind of situation that Funky and I are not impresssed about. Or maybe you think that 11.48 is a reasonable wage for someone who does not have "the right bit of paper"?