Twin v single fin
Thread Starter
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
From: essex
Twin v single fin
The answer to this is probably obvious to you guys but us mere mortals can only wonder, why is it that the Americans seem to prefer a twin fin design for their interceptors/fighters F15,17,18,19,22,35,117 etc wheras the Europeans seem to prefer a single fin (albeit a large one) what are the advantages/disadvantages of each configuration?
Last edited by mikip; 16th March 2009 at 15:44. Reason: lousy spelling
Joined: Feb 2006
Aviation Qualifications: LAME
Posts: 36,145
Likes: 5,739
From: Falling off the end of the thread
That and possibly handling.. It might well also reduce the size of the actuators to power them by having two smaller surfaces over one big one, I suppose in a combat situation you also have a certain amount of redundancy built in by doubling up on them.
On WW2 aircraft like the Lancaster it was to put the rudders in the propwash of the inboard engines, the accelerated air over the rudders and fins meant that you had rudder authority at lower speeds on take off etc and improved handling, as well as reducing the control surfaces size from a single item.
On WW2 aircraft like the Lancaster it was to put the rudders in the propwash of the inboard engines, the accelerated air over the rudders and fins meant that you had rudder authority at lower speeds on take off etc and improved handling, as well as reducing the control surfaces size from a single item.
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
From: UK
Along with preceeding valid points......
probably helps keep the radar signature down a bit having 2 smaller.
Deffo keeps the gun target size down a bit on a fighter.
You need to provide the required keel surface, may as well try to keep it compact
probably helps keep the radar signature down a bit having 2 smaller.
Deffo keeps the gun target size down a bit on a fighter.
You need to provide the required keel surface, may as well try to keep it compact
