Light aircraft engineer. How?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Light aircraft engineer. How?
Hey guys,
I have been reading regarding a career in the engineering industry however I am getting rather confused with the potential processes of doing it.
Could someone please break down the methods/qualifications/options of becoming a light aircraft engineer and is a light aircraft engineer any different to a fully licenced 747 engineer (in terms of getting there).
Thanks
I have been reading regarding a career in the engineering industry however I am getting rather confused with the potential processes of doing it.
Could someone please break down the methods/qualifications/options of becoming a light aircraft engineer and is a light aircraft engineer any different to a fully licenced 747 engineer (in terms of getting there).
Thanks
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Oxfordshire
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Genghis.
If you are going to take the time to respond why not respond with something that might help the lad ?
Sparks
I am not at my normal computer right now but will send you some links later.
If you are going to take the time to respond why not respond with something that might help the lad ?
Sparks
I am not at my normal computer right now but will send you some links later.
Karl - sorry if I seemed unhelpful, not my intention. But...
The word "engineer" in English can encompass designing aeroplanes, building aeroplanes, or maintaining aeroplanes. These are all quite distinct skill-sets, requiring different qualifications.
"Light aircraft" could cover gliders, microlights, light homebuilts, certified SEP, MEP, or even in some people's world-view, business jets.
The answer then changes a lot depending upon which combination of these are the direction in which Sparks is interested in trying to take his career.
Sparks - no unhelpfulness intended on my part, but if you'd like to elaborate a bit, I'll try and say something more useful.
G
The word "engineer" in English can encompass designing aeroplanes, building aeroplanes, or maintaining aeroplanes. These are all quite distinct skill-sets, requiring different qualifications.
"Light aircraft" could cover gliders, microlights, light homebuilts, certified SEP, MEP, or even in some people's world-view, business jets.
The answer then changes a lot depending upon which combination of these are the direction in which Sparks is interested in trying to take his career.
Sparks - no unhelpfulness intended on my part, but if you'd like to elaborate a bit, I'll try and say something more useful.
G
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: over here
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you can fund yourself on a Part 66 course, you should be quite an attractive prospect to a potential employer. We have just taken on a chap who was an estate agent and with the downturn, was looking for a career change. He goes to college Mondays, and works for us Tue-Fri. All being well, we will have a chap who is both experienced and licensed in a year or three.
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: oop north
Age: 54
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Unless you have a special reason for wanting to become a light aircraft engineer id forget it, the pays rubbish and career prospects limited, far more sensible to go down the route of getting qualified on the commercial types ,and im speaking as someone who began his career on light aircraft (and was quite happy until i realized what a type rated line engineer on the big stuff could earn!)
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Inverted
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
smudgethecat is right. As i refer to a light aircraft enginner as is someone who works on cessna 152's, 172's etc. I started off on these type of aircraft then moving to Beech King Airs. It was great to learn on and loved it. But {the big but!!}, now im working the line at Stansted on A320's, B767 and loving it. Nowadays learning the bigger aircraft is i would say more benificial cause you can open your options up alot more than just having C152 on your cv. We all have the same licence apart from a few deviations in exam modules. If your a light aircraft engineer or a heavy aircraft engineer, we all have the same responsibilitys. The only difference in aircraft is the light aircraft have to be flown by someone and the heavy aircraft have to have a working computer to fly!!!
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: UK, US, now more ɐıןɐɹʇsn∀
Age: 41
Posts: 889
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hello Sparks.
We've got something in common. Almost. I'm too wanting to become pilot and get trained as an engineer (maintenance side, not design, have enough of sitting in front of PC for a job as a career prospect). We swapped couple posts elsewhere..
Hope your saving still goes well. I've returned from the US, 50ish hours on R22 twitchy things, planning some taildragger flying towards PPL next year while occasional gliding lesson should I find time and good weather at the same time. Hard with two jobs (FT hours) and FT+PT studies.. I'll leave some of the savings aside and do PPL (A) so that I can fly for fun - not just gliders while training and saving for heli CPL etc.
I'd like to specialise in helis. I will see how far I'll get, but I'm starting 'part 66 degree' either with Glamorgan Uni (with ICAT at Cardiff airport) or Kingston (rather not due to locations and course structure, nothing against programmes themselves)
Can't tell from experience/insider knowledge - I'm just keen wannabe for both sides of aviation, but it feels to me that you're more likely to get job on turbine airliners, whether as an apprentice or after having part 66 theory. If you were in the US, you could do their A&P papers, 2 years at local college (where available) or just do apprenticeship and PT study. There's more FW FTOs that would do apprenticeship on SEP aircraft. No idea about UK market..
edit: c24 'beat me' to it. My opinion is supported by pros in the industry as it seems.
We've got something in common. Almost. I'm too wanting to become pilot and get trained as an engineer (maintenance side, not design, have enough of sitting in front of PC for a job as a career prospect). We swapped couple posts elsewhere..
Hope your saving still goes well. I've returned from the US, 50ish hours on R22 twitchy things, planning some taildragger flying towards PPL next year while occasional gliding lesson should I find time and good weather at the same time. Hard with two jobs (FT hours) and FT+PT studies.. I'll leave some of the savings aside and do PPL (A) so that I can fly for fun - not just gliders while training and saving for heli CPL etc.
I'd like to specialise in helis. I will see how far I'll get, but I'm starting 'part 66 degree' either with Glamorgan Uni (with ICAT at Cardiff airport) or Kingston (rather not due to locations and course structure, nothing against programmes themselves)
Can't tell from experience/insider knowledge - I'm just keen wannabe for both sides of aviation, but it feels to me that you're more likely to get job on turbine airliners, whether as an apprentice or after having part 66 theory. If you were in the US, you could do their A&P papers, 2 years at local college (where available) or just do apprenticeship and PT study. There's more FW FTOs that would do apprenticeship on SEP aircraft. No idea about UK market..
edit: c24 'beat me' to it. My opinion is supported by pros in the industry as it seems.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,909
Received 2,834 Likes
on
1,210 Posts
Hmm I would have a look on Aviation Jobsearch, Pay has moved significantly in the Upwards direction as a result of the severe shortage of "Light Engineers" though "Light" is a Misnomer as the old Para 5.5 and 6.3 covers DC7, DC6, DC4, DC3 etc...... heck I even have stuff on it Ive never seen....
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Dorset
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Try this Filton College: freedom to find your future
You can do short courses in conjection with a job, or take a couple of years full time study,
BR om15
You can do short courses in conjection with a job, or take a couple of years full time study,
BR om15
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Bedford, UK
Age: 62
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Light aircraft engineers
Yes, there will probably be more money to be made on large jets(though the gap has narrowed quite a bit going by my recent job hunt), but working on light planes has advantages, such as no security hassle at small airfields -read some of the letters to CHIRP Feedback- no stressed out passengers waiting and no shifts, just Monday-Friday 8.00-4.30.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,909
Received 2,834 Likes
on
1,210 Posts
HAWK21MOut here Aircraft with MAUW of 5700kgs & above are called heavy Aircraft,below 5700kgs are light aircraft.
regds
MEL
regds
MEL