Notices
Engineers & Technicians In this day and age of increased CRM and safety awareness, a forum for the guys and girls who keep our a/c serviceable.

Beech Baron

Old 6th May 2007 | 04:30
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: At home
Beech Baron

Just wondering if anyone knows the aerodynamic reason behind the Beech Baron 55 being certified to use flap on take off, whereas the 58 is not?

Cheers
O&G
Over and gout is offline  
Reply
Old 6th May 2007 | 11:50
  #2 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 775
Likes: 2
From: near EDDF
Maybe you get your answer here
IFixPlanes is offline  
Reply
Old 7th May 2007 | 04:49
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 3
From: Arizona USA
Climb rate, or rather lack thereof, on one engine is the primary reason.
Unless the runway is very short, the use of flaps for takeoff on most (but not all) general aviation single and multi engine piston powered aeroplanes is not an especially good idea.
Modified or original build STOL types excepted.
The reason is quite simple.
Nearly all airfoil sections, whether swept wing or straight, will exhibit improved rate of climb with no flaps versus flaps extended.
This is especially important for light multi-engine piston powered GA types, which have, at best, limited climb ability with an engine failed.
Turboprops?
Well, the Cessna 441 for example does indeed use flaps for takeoff, but OTOH has rather good performance on one engine, thanks to the SHP available.
411A is offline  
Reply
Old 7th May 2007 | 06:40
  #4 (permalink)  
Está servira para distraerle.
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 6
Likes: 1
From: In a perambulator.


You asked for an aerodynamic reason for the flap discrepancy and so here goes....

From long gone memory, is not the wing surface of the B55, from just aft of the leading edge until the flap itself rather high profile riveted and is not that of the B58 much smoother and more aerodynamic?
One regrets that the front garden provides access to neither machine to check this but it was a bit of a memory nuisance when transferring from one to the other in the good old days of barnstorming bush bashing.
cavortingcheetah is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.