Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Engineers & Technicians
Reload this Page >

What is a Nominated Post-Holder?


Notices
Engineers & Technicians In this day and age of increased CRM and safety awareness, a forum for the guys and girls who keep our a/c serviceable.

What is a Nominated Post-Holder?

Old 15th January 2007 | 10:50
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: Worldwide
What is a Nominated Post-Holder?

Looking through an MOE and see this term in Part 1. How is a nominated post-holder different from any other manager?
George Bush's Brain is offline  
Reply
Old 15th January 2007 | 11:15
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
From: Dorset
Nominated Post Holder.

A nominated post holder has to be Approved by the NAA, in the UK this is carried out by the CAA using an EASA Form 4, this is the Approval of the Managers named in the Part 1 of the MOE.
Also the CAA Form AD458 is used to nominate staff for specific tasks, ie C of A renewals.

regards,
om15
om15 is offline  
Reply
Old 15th January 2007 | 11:26
  #3 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,131
Likes: 57
From: Anglia
They have responsibilities as defined in Part M, Part 147, or Part 145.
They normally have an interview with the NAA to ensure their knowlege of responsibilities too.
This makes them 'accountable' for what they then do to your companies...and also familiar with/to the NAA for the next complaints.
Rigga is offline  
Reply
Old 15th January 2007 | 12:04
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: Antarctica
Originally Posted by om15
A nominated post holder has to be Approved by the NAA, in the UK this is carried out by the CAA using an EASA Form 4, this is the Approval of the Managers named in the Part 1 of the MOE.
Also the CAA Form AD458 is used to nominate staff for specific tasks, ie C of A renewals.

regards,
om15
But there other EASA Form 4 positions not classed as "nominated"?
Ravintola is offline  
Reply
Old 15th January 2007 | 12:15
  #5 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,131
Likes: 57
From: Anglia
Situations vary with the size and compilation of the company.
It also varies with the split of responsibilities for managers throughout the company.
Each is decided by the NAA as to who it fits the responsibilities of "nominated" posts, normally done at the initial submission of the MOE/MMOE/CAME, or to any major re-shuffle of responsibilities.

All rules are as firm as vapour.
Rigga is offline  
Reply
Old 16th January 2007 | 03:41
  #6 (permalink)  
Cunning Artificer
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,125
Likes: 7
From: The spiritual home of DeHavilland
A company holding an (EASA Member State) AOC must have:

1. An "Accountable Manager" who has corporate authority for ensuring that all the operations - including maintenance - can be financed and carried out to the standard required by the AOC - including Part M. This is usually the operator's CEO, but for a small firm may the aircraft owner.

2. A person or group of persons nominated with the responsibility of ensuring that the organization is always in compliance with Part M requirements. Such persons are ultimately responsible to the Accountable Manager. This group is referred to as the "Continuing Airworthiness Management Organization" (or CAMO for short).

3. A "Nominated Postholder" designated by the Accountable Manager who is responsible for the management and supervision of continuing airworthiness activities. This person heads the CAMO. For the small operator this job may be sub-conracted - but not to the maintenance organization that maintains the aircraft.

The Nominated Postholder may not be employed by a separate Part 145 maintenance organization that is contracted to perform maintenance for the operator. (although other members of the "group of persons" may, in some circumstances, be employed by the contractor - as Rigga says the rules are like vapour).
Blacksheep is offline  
Reply
Old 16th January 2007 | 06:29
  #7 (permalink)  

Pilots' Pal
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 1,158
Likes: 0
From: USA
Rules are vapourish:

Last year, I was a CAM for a small operator flying a PA31; not a type for which I hold a licence. The CAA were happy.
A colleague of mine is a CAM for a rotary-wing operator. Before he was accepted as such, the CAA insisted on his taking a course on the type operated.
Different ROs apply the rules differently!
Bus429 is offline  
Reply
Old 16th January 2007 | 07:57
  #8 (permalink)  
50 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 668
Likes: 0
From: Adelaide
Yes Minister.
SeldomFixit is offline  
Reply
Old 17th January 2007 | 12:03
  #9 (permalink)  
Community Builder
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Aviation Qualifications: LAME
Posts: 36,137
Likes: 5,738
From: Falling off the end of the thread
Yep same as a nominated engineer really....... I am one
NutLoose is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.