Aircraft tyres: Air or nitrogen?
Thread Starter
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
From: Pembrokeshire UK
Aircraft tyres: Air or nitrogen?
When I was working at LHR in the old BOAC hangar, we inflated B 707 & 747 tyres with nitrogen. I am retired now, but a young engineer friend tells me that air is sometimes used now. I thought there was a BCARS requirement for nitrogen, and wonder if air being cheaper is now used to save money?

Joined: Feb 2006
Aviation Qualifications: LAME
Posts: 1,129
Likes: 168
From: Station 42
That's right, Milt. There was a fatality some years ago when a tyre exploded, puncturing the fuselage and a child was sucked out (I suppose blown out is more correct). I think it was over Israel but I don't remember the aircraft or airline.
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
From: Dorset
Tyre inflation.
Reference CAP747 Generic requirement no 16. ( Previously issued as AWN no 70).
".... all braked wheels of retractable landing gear units on aeroplanes defined in para 1 will be required to have tyres inflated with Nitrogen or other suitable inert gas, and maintained such as to limit the Oxygen content of the compressed gases to not greater that 5% by Volume."
key points seem to be braked wheels and retractracable gears,
regards,
om15.
".... all braked wheels of retractable landing gear units on aeroplanes defined in para 1 will be required to have tyres inflated with Nitrogen or other suitable inert gas, and maintained such as to limit the Oxygen content of the compressed gases to not greater that 5% by Volume."
key points seem to be braked wheels and retractracable gears,
regards,
om15.
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
From: London
Another of the reasons for using nitrogen ( I was always told this was the main reason), is that a nitrogen molecule is approx 4 times the size of an oxygen molecule, and as rubber is slightly permeable, the leakage rate is far less. ( I know air is only about 22% oyxgen, but that is still enough for leakage to be a problem).
This leakage isn't really noticeable at ground level, but once you get to high altitude, it then becomes more of a factor, due to the higher differential between the internal pressure of the tyre and the ambient pressure.
This leakage isn't really noticeable at ground level, but once you get to high altitude, it then becomes more of a factor, due to the higher differential between the internal pressure of the tyre and the ambient pressure.

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,131
Likes: 57
From: Anglia
Another of the reasons for using nitrogen ( I was always told this was the main reason), is that a nitrogen molecule is approx 4 times the size of an oxygen molecule, and as rubber is slightly permeable, the leakage rate is far less. ( I know air is only about 22% oyxgen, but that is still enough for leakage to be a problem).
This leakage isn't really noticeable at ground level, but once you get to high altitude, it then becomes more of a factor, due to the higher differential between the internal pressure of the tyre and the ambient pressure.
This leakage isn't really noticeable at ground level, but once you get to high altitude, it then becomes more of a factor, due to the higher differential between the internal pressure of the tyre and the ambient pressure.
This might be an observation on the use of N2 - but is certainly not a reason for it.
The "Reason" is it's inert properties.
Personally, I've had N2 sent 100's of miles to me, rather than use air in an aircraft.
I would rather use Helium!
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
From: Uk

Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
From: Europe
From GoodYear AIRCRAFT TIRE CARE AND MAINTENANCE manual
USE DRY NITROGEN GAS (WHEN REQUIRED)
Nitrogen will not sustain combustion and will reduce degradation of the liner material, casing plies and
wheel due to oxidation.
http://www.goodyearaviation.com/tirecare.html
(Page 11)
Nitrogen will not sustain combustion and will reduce degradation of the liner material, casing plies and
wheel due to oxidation.
http://www.goodyearaviation.com/tirecare.html
(Page 11)

Joined: Feb 2006
Aviation Qualifications: LAME
Posts: 1,129
Likes: 168
From: Station 42
Further to tribo's post:
http://www.dunlopaircrafttyres.com/t...172/DM1172.pdf contains excellent information (a lot of which I'd forgotten)
and this, from Trans Technical Services Co Inc:
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN A TIRE EXPLODES? Air Safety Week
had an interesting article on the energy released by exploding tires in their August
7, 2000 issue. It was addressing the tire failure on the Concorde. If you go to page
3 (of that issue) you will find a chart − Energy Released by Catastrophic Tire
Deflations. If you “used the same numbers” for a P-3 (Navy aircraft) main
landing gear tire at 200 pounds per square inch (psi) tire pressure to approximate
the energy released by a 747 main landing gear tire failure (194 psi) − it would be
301,071 foot pounds . . . . equal to 0.60 sticks of dynamite. If the tire burst at
the maximum pressure of 1,170 psi it would release 1,215,789 foot pounds of
energy − an amount equal to 4.4 sticks of dynamite.
http://www.dunlopaircrafttyres.com/t...172/DM1172.pdf contains excellent information (a lot of which I'd forgotten)
and this, from Trans Technical Services Co Inc:
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN A TIRE EXPLODES? Air Safety Week
had an interesting article on the energy released by exploding tires in their August
7, 2000 issue. It was addressing the tire failure on the Concorde. If you go to page
3 (of that issue) you will find a chart − Energy Released by Catastrophic Tire
Deflations. If you “used the same numbers” for a P-3 (Navy aircraft) main
landing gear tire at 200 pounds per square inch (psi) tire pressure to approximate
the energy released by a 747 main landing gear tire failure (194 psi) − it would be
301,071 foot pounds . . . . equal to 0.60 sticks of dynamite. If the tire burst at
the maximum pressure of 1,170 psi it would release 1,215,789 foot pounds of
energy − an amount equal to 4.4 sticks of dynamite.
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 236
Likes: 1
From: belgium



