Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Engineers & Technicians
Reload this Page >

RR Trent 1000 for the 787 first start up - On Schedule

Wikiposts
Search
Engineers & Technicians In this day and age of increased CRM and safety awareness, a forum for the guys and girls who keep our a/c serviceable.

RR Trent 1000 for the 787 first start up - On Schedule

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Feb 2006, 00:07
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: fairly close to the colonial capitol
Age: 55
Posts: 1,693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RR Trent 1000 for the 787 first start up - On Schedule

Rolls-Royce has successfully completed the first test bed run of its Trent 1000 engine, being developed for the Boeing 787 Dreamliner. The engine ran exactly to schedule against the date of 14 February set almost three years earlier.

As launch engine on the Boeing 787, the Trent 1000 is the first of the aircraft’s powerplants to run, and will also be the first in the air when it takes to the skies on a Rolls-Royce Boeing 747 flying test bed in the first quarter of 2007.

Following certification by the airworthiness authorities next summer, it will power the 787 Dreamliner’s first flight and will begin commercial operations with launch customer ANA (All Nippon Airways) in mid 2008.

More here:
http://www.rolls-royce.com/media/showPR.jsp?PR_ID=40302

With kerosene prices where they are - efficient engines and fuel-saving airframes like these are the future of commercial aviation. Nice going RR !
vapilot2004 is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2006, 07:47
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Superb!

A company to be proud of, and that's becoming rarer these days!

Wonder if they'd care to take over the running of UK plc? The current "administrators" (using the term loosely in their case) seem hell bent on killing it off!
Erwin Schroedinger is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2006, 08:12
  #3 (permalink)  


Sims Fly Virtually
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Used to be 3rd Sand Dune from the Left - But now I'm somewhere else somewhere else.
Posts: 704
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

Proud of indeed! And just maybe I'm biassed but I always get a "feelgood" when I climb stairs (at some airports) and pass those big paraffin-guzzlers with the "Double R" on the sides
ExSimGuy is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2006, 08:21
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 378
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
35 years flying RR powered machines (Trident, 757, 767, 777) and never had a failure.
woodpecker is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2006, 08:24
  #5 (permalink)  


Sims Fly Virtually
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Used to be 3rd Sand Dune from the Left - But now I'm somewhere else somewhere else.
Posts: 704
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Have you seen the picture of the "modified 747" that will be used to "transport major assemblies from factory to factory"?



If Boeing could put 2 or maybe even 3 decks in that, and some windows, maybe the 380 would have competition! (or maybe I have just discovered the way that Boeing plan to avoid critisism and test the 797) - Remember - you heard it on PPRuNe

(Though one has to admit that it's butt-ugly )
ExSimGuy is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2006, 10:03
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: london
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jesus that is ugly,
At least it is'nt flying yet unlike the ugly A380.(Personal opinion only)!!!.

WTDWL.
whattimedoweland is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2006, 12:06
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flyover country USA
Age: 82
Posts: 4,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ugly?

Beluga ugly?

barit1 is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2006, 15:42
  #8 (permalink)  

Rebel PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Toronto, Canada (formerly EICK)
Age: 51
Posts: 2,834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There was a time when UKplc had to take over RR so I guess they could return the favour
MarkD is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2006, 17:06
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Back on The Island.
Posts: 480
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
barit1.....the A380 is NOT Beluga .
zed3 is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2006, 19:06
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: west sussex
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Now Beluga, that is ugly in a sort of beautiful way. If you know what I mean..
jonseagull is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2006, 21:33
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flyover country USA
Age: 82
Posts: 4,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by zed3
barit1.....the A380 is NOT Beluga .
I wuz merely making a comparison between the 747-UGLY and A380 and Beluga, of course.
barit1 is offline  
Old 18th Feb 2006, 11:12
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Under the clouds now
Age: 86
Posts: 2,506
Received 16 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by woodpecker
35 years flying RR powered machines (Trident, 757, 767, 777) and never had a failure.
Better keep that QRH handy!
brakedwell is offline  
Old 18th Feb 2006, 14:04
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: A car park. :(
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by woodpecker
35 years flying RR powered machines (Trident, 757, 767, 777) and never had a failure
The airline woodpecker (obviously) works for and their maintenance standards (relative to the sort of shambolic outfits I've suffered with, anyway) probably help.

One wonders how there could be so much variation in maintenance standards between airlines when the CAA oversee.........

Ah! Just answered my own question.
Marvin the Robot is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.