Wikiposts
Search
Engineers & Technicians In this day and age of increased CRM and safety awareness, a forum for the guys and girls who keep our a/c serviceable.

What needs improvement

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Nov 2005, 23:14
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question What needs improvement

Hi everyone,
I just enrolled in an aircraft engineering course, but they threw me into the second year and I am a bit lost. Now I have to come up with an idea for a project. I can either design something, or make something or just write a paper. Topic: what part of a transport aircraft needs improvement. I'd be thankful for any help.
Any ideas???? Please..........
Cheers
Ekiam is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2005, 00:03
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: position data invalid
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How about seat tracks!!

They always seem to fill with grit , debris, welcome all sorts of spillage and are very prone to corrosion.

It is not uncommon to see many replaced during a/c overhaul visits. Very time consuming and costly!!

With the exception of heavy inhibiting, I don't really know the solution.

that's my input
rgds

cod
cod liver oil is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2005, 11:46
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lightbulb

Thank you for trying to help me out here. I will think about your idea. Also thought that it is strange that airliners don't have some kind of retractable skies, so that in an emergency they can land on water. Is that just because it would be too expensive, or am I missing something else here? Is that idea too unrealistic? Why doesn't something like that exist? It surely would make an engine failure over the ocean a lot less dangerous.
Any conflicting ideas, please advice!

Cheers guys...
Ekiam is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2005, 12:35
  #4 (permalink)  

Pilots' Pal
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: USA
Age: 63
Posts: 1,158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ekiam,

Don't wish to discourage you, mate, but projects about fitting skis (I assume you mean skis ) won't really do it. Even if theoretically feasible, skis (or floats) would be too expensive and too big. Just look at the size of floats fitted to some single engined Cessnas.
How about looking at issues such as passenger smoke hoods? More passengers have died as a result of smoke inhalation than drowning post-ditching (and there have not been many ditchings, at least not survivable ditchings)
Bus429 is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2005, 13:41
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Andalucia
Posts: 728
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
While aware of the merits of smoke hoods for the cargo, I feel that they are a non-starter. The civilised population is conditioned, virtually from birth, not to shove it's head into a plastic bag and breath normally. While you can train crew to do it it is a totally different matter for Joe Public. I feel this is why, or at least one of the reasons why, this desirable bit of safety equipment never gets off the ground.
Wodrick is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.