Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Engineers & Technicians
Reload this Page >

Monarch Aircraft Engineering ?500,000 prang

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Engineers & Technicians In this day and age of increased CRM and safety awareness, a forum for the guys and girls who keep our a/c serviceable.

Monarch Aircraft Engineering £500,000 prang

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th October 2005 | 12:44
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
From: UK
Monarch Aircraft Engineering £500,000 prang

Small photo at http://www.manchesteronline.co.uk/m...jet_prang_.html

IT is the parking prang that will cost more than £½ million.

Ground staff reversing a passenger jet at Manchester Airport accidentally struck an aircraft hangar causing a long delay for more than 300 passengers - and a six-figure bill for holiday firm Thomas Cook.

The rudder on the Airbus 330 was twisted in the prang during a routine maintenance check by engineers.



Thomas Cook was immediately forced to cancel its scheduled flight to Cuba and scour airports around the world for a replacement aircraft big enough to take the 333 disappointed passengers.

After a frantic search, the only available stand-in plane was found - a Boeing 747 in Madrid.

It cost Thomas Cook £200,000 to charter the plane from a firm called Air Pullmantur and then to fly it from Spain to Manchester.

Meanwhile, the firm also had to pay an estimated £150,000 to fly a new rudder to Manchester in a Hercules cargo plane from the Airbus factory in Toulouse, France.

Repairing the damage is expected to cost an additional £200,000. And then there was the expense of arranging hotels for the 333 stranded passengers and supplying them with meal vouchers - another bill of around £25,000.

As the holidaymakers left Manchester Airport for Cayo Coco 30 hours late, Thomas Cook bosses were said to be "furious" at the sky-high cost of the minor crash.

It is understood it occurred while the aircraft was being moved on the ground by staff working for Monarch Aircraft Engineering.

Grandfather Kaz Janski, a holidaymaker from Huddersfield, was with a family of five who paid £4,000 for their trip.

Shortly before he finally boarded the replacement plane for the 10-hour flight, he said: "We were already in the departure lounge when we were eventually told we would be spending the night in Manchester."

A Thomas Cook spokesman said: "We did everything we could to help our passengers following the delay caused by this situation."

A spokesman for Monarch Aircraft Engineering said: "We can confirm that damage was caused to an aircraft while it was being manoeuvred. An investigation has been launched."
King Pong is offline  
Old 9th October 2005 | 10:31
  #2 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
From: England
Your link is broken and I think someone got a bit carried away with the zeros on those guestimates.
£150000 to fly the rudder in -
Fargoo is offline  
Old 9th October 2005 | 13:00
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
From: oop north
big deal, rudder got damaged so what? sh1t happens
smudgethecat is offline  
Old 11th October 2005 | 19:06
  #4 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,581
Likes: 0
From: flyover country USA
Try this link

I think I'd look awfully closely at the fin for secondary damage.
barit1 is offline  
Old 12th October 2005 | 16:14
  #5 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
From: England
I'd take back your comment, the photo was taken after a lot of work was already done preparing to remove the rudder.
The fin isn't damaged - just bits removed.
Fargoo is offline  
Old 15th October 2005 | 07:52
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
From: Manchester
Just as a matter of interest, how are the banksmans career prospects doing???
cessna l plate is offline  
Old 20th October 2005 | 20:17
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: UK
!!!!e happens, i was at BA when 2 similar things happened to 744's. one not our own! Both of which took months to repair!

I hope the usual corporate witch hunt doesnt ensue.

Human Factors anyone???


F/Satis
FunctionedSatis is offline  
Old 21st October 2005 | 07:16
  #8 (permalink)  

Pilots' Pal
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 1,158
Likes: 0
From: USA
If MAEL MAN hasn't changed since I left, commercial pressure and table-banging are the norm.
Bus429 is offline  
Old 13th November 2005 | 00:39
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: USA
"Sh1t happens" - What a professional attitude.

With attitudes of like this, what hope for the standing & status of LAEs?

Time & pressure no excuse for not having wing & tail men when putting an aircraft in or out of a hangar.
facts please is offline  
Old 13th November 2005 | 12:31
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
From: oop north
get your facts right facts please before posting crap like that when you havent a clue what went on, wingmen were present and the accident still happened no doubt not helped by the fact the driver has a very tight slot in the roof to get the fin through and a very limited area to manovuere his tug ,sh1t happens get over it
smudgethecat is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.