Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Engineers & Technicians In this day and age of increased CRM and safety awareness, a forum for the guys and girls who keep our a/c serviceable.

pax leg room

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th February 2002 | 11:01
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: London
Question pax leg room

I've recently had a chat with one of our Maintrol guys. He has heard that the CAA are considering increasing the minimum seat pitch to 31in. Apparently if this is the case then our A320s with 180 seat config would no longer be economically viable for charter service.
abeesley is offline  
Old 18th February 2002 | 20:12
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
Post

Check out the Sunday Times and Daily Telegraph Travel sections for update on this.

At current seat prices then you would lose money, seat prices would have to rise across the board to maintain profitability.
brabazon is offline  
Old 19th February 2002 | 08:30
  #3 (permalink)  
Cunning Artificer
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,125
Likes: 7
From: The spiritual home of DeHavilland
Cool

Give the SLF 31 inches and the b*ggers will be wanting recline next!

**********************************. .Through difficulties to the cinema
Blacksheep is offline  
Old 20th February 2002 | 00:42
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: luton
Wink

CAA have commissioned report on behalf of the JAA. .Several recomendations have come out of this due to the increased size of pax since the last review. .Report recommends 28.2" pitch @ dimension A iaw AWN64 as well as lots of other issues.

Airbuz have negated this by carrying out an evacuation trial to to prove an AMOC to the AWN

There is currentlly no other NAA that has this requirement
sokitt is offline  
Old 20th February 2002 | 14:06
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: Africa
Post

I've heard through unofficial channels that JAA are considering a 32" pitch minimum. Anyone heard anything to substantiate this ?
bearkeeper is offline  
Old 20th February 2002 | 14:20
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
Post

sokkit

Do you know the mix of people used in the Airbus trial, the report for the JAA which recommended increasing Dimension A - as defined in AN64 - was based on the consultants view that 26 inches isn't sufficient for a proportion of the population going to 28.2 would allow 95% of Europeans to move in and out of their seats. It's not based on evacuation criteria. see <a href="http://www.ice.co.uk" target="_blank">www.ice.co.uk</a> for the full report.
brabazon is offline  
Old 21st February 2002 | 03:20
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: luton
Thumbs up

Brabazon

I have the full report . .It is only recomendations and does make a statement that further investigation is required . .Incidentally , @ 29/30" pitch we have had numerous congrats letters from pax(no bribes involved). Very little complaints, perhaps we fly small people! . .depends on what you pays and what the expectation is?. .Report really looked at long haul stuff -min sector over 3 hrs, so it could effect charter boys and the big birds more than us little guys
sokitt is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.