Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Engineers & Technicians In this day and age of increased CRM and safety awareness, a forum for the guys and girls who keep our a/c serviceable.

C duct closure

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th July 2001 | 04:50
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: UK
Cool C duct closure

Does anyone else out there in ppruneland carry out duplicate inspections (RII's) on closure (and associated function checks) of thrust reversers which double as engine cowlings? Typicaly B757's.
The Weasel is offline  
Old 24th July 2001 | 11:26
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: U.K
Post

As you well know BA doesn't have a requirement to carry out a dupe for closure or to function the t/r post c-duct closure. I can only assume this is because the amount of people required to actually close them with respect to the older 'c' engined powered a/c would far exceed the usefullness of a dupe less the extra certification stamp.
I suppose it would be quite difficult to dispatch one of these a/c with the c-ducts unlatched baring in mind the baulk design of the hinged doors covering the latches.

Having said that it was probably never imagined that a certain roll-on roll-off car ferry would ever be allowed to leave port with its bow doors open.
Ali Crom is offline  
Old 26th July 2001 | 22:52
  #3 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
From: UK
Post

Hi there weasel

In aircraft maintenance anything is possible and the great law of Sod usually prevails. Not quite C-Ducts but check out the following extract from this air accident investigation report -

As the aircraft rotated for take off, both fan cowl doors detached from the No 1 Powerplant and struck the aircraft. The doors were destroyed and localised damage resulted to the No 1 Powerplant and its pylon, the left wing, the left flaps and slats, the fuselage and the fin. The evidence indicated that the doors had probably remained unlatched, after having been closed following maintenance prior to the accident flight and had been torn off their pylon attachment hinges by aerodynamic forces as the aircraft rotated. There are no conspicuous cues to indicate an unlatched condition when the doors are closed and no flight deck indication. Three walk-round inspections had been conducted after the doors had been closed.

After this the repective maintenance org quickly added fan cowls to their list of dupe inspections.

It is also interseting to note the AAIB recommended that the CAA also made it a requirement for similar aircraft types !

I dread to think what would happen if a C-Duct came off !!!!
Golden Rivet is offline  
Old 27th July 2001 | 14:14
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: UK
Post

If indeed the fan cowls were unlatched in this incident, it would be interesting to know what the "three walk-rounds" consisted of. If your doing a walk-round prior to departure the engines are one of the main items to check! For this to be missed three times is p**s poor. I would be feeling pretty guilty had I departed it, what was the aircraft type, where did it depart from?
BobTheRocker is offline  
Old 28th July 2001 | 15:12
  #5 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
From: UK
Post

full AAIB report can be found at
http://www.aaib.dtlr.gov.uk/bulletin/jul00/gvced.htm

[ 28 July 2001: Message edited by: Golden Rivet ]
Golden Rivet is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.