Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Engineers & Technicians
Reload this Page >

Oxygen charging in the hanger


Notices
Engineers & Technicians In this day and age of increased CRM and safety awareness, a forum for the guys and girls who keep our a/c serviceable.

Oxygen charging in the hanger

Old 26th November 2004 | 16:26
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 263
Likes: 1
From: farrrr east
Post Oxygen charging in the hanger

We recently had a debate about charging aircraft with Oxygen in the hangar, Various people argued for and against it, in the end we went to the aircraft manual's of the types operated and found no mention.
allthatglitters is offline  
Old 26th November 2004 | 17:02
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
From: C-YUL
Do you mean charging portable and crew O2 bottles. If so, why not. As long as you have a dedicated oil and contaminent free room, with the proper regulator's and preferably an oxygen bath or contaimnmet unit why not.If it's is done properly it is safe and quick.
WJman is offline  
Old 26th November 2004 | 17:50
  #3 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
From: UK
Lots of companies, mine included, have banned all forms of oxygen charging.
Golden Rivet is offline  
Old 26th November 2004 | 18:15
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
From: C-YUL
Is this in the UK? Why have companies banned O2 charging. I understand the risks but as long as safe precautions are followed it would be no more dangerous than countless other tasks we perform that are dangerous to a certain extent.
WJman is offline  
Old 27th November 2004 | 10:17
  #5 (permalink)  
Cunning Artificer
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,125
Likes: 7
From: The spiritual home of DeHavilland
Lightbulb

Back in RAF days we used Liquid Oxygen instead of gaseous - even including the military VC10s. The vapour coming out of the vent during Lox charging was just the job for fast chilling a Coca Cola can out East (or even in UK during the summer) Much ado about nothing I think. Oxygen charging is as safe as refuelling as long as you do it by the book.
Blacksheep is offline  
Old 28th November 2004 | 00:03
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
From: EGNT
The rot was started by the yanks. F.A.R something or another which prohibited in-situ servicing of oxygen systems. So for some unknown reason we have decided to follow suit and now have to remove the bottle from the aircraft and send it away for replenishment.
HiSpeedTape is offline  
Old 28th November 2004 | 02:48
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,300
Likes: 0
From: Canberra Australia
Fire is the risk.

ANY grease or oil in the presence of high pressure oxygen is a certain fire lighter.

May be there are a few other substances which will burn spontaneously in the presence of pure oxygen. What about human body oil? Anyone know?

So how about a few actuals described for our benefit.
Milt is offline  
Old 28th November 2004 | 09:32
  #8 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 1998
Posts: 3,038
Likes: 52
From: .
HSE on O2
spannersatcx is offline  
Old 28th November 2004 | 12:00
  #9 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Aviation Qualifications: Spotter
Posts: 2,143
Likes: 4
From: EGGW
Question

My company allows charging in Hangar if charging is listed in AMM and if not, the bottle is removed and a replacement fitted. Cabin portable bottles are replaced and recharged in our workshop, where an area is set aside with its own equipment.
Mr @ Spotty M is offline  
Old 28th November 2004 | 17:03
  #10 (permalink)  

Usual disclaimers apply!
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 843
Likes: 0
From: EGGW
Cool

We charge the O2 systems in situ, but not in the hangar.
Personally I don't see a problem with charging in the hangar, the procedures we have are robust enough.
Portable O2 bottles are sent away.
gas path is offline  
Old 28th November 2004 | 17:51
  #11 (permalink)  

UkEng
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: England
I think it's a company thing, some don't like it being done in the hangar for insurance reasons - if it does catch fire it's better that it happens outside.
Portable oxy cylinders get sent away in our firm.
ukeng is offline  
Old 28th November 2004 | 20:11
  #12 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 263
Likes: 1
From: farrrr east
Thank you for your responses.
Sorry, I should have been more specific, it's the charging of fixed oxygen cylinders, were the aircraft is fitted with the pipe work for toping up.
The aircraft without this provision and the portable bottles are also sent away for topping up.
A previous company I worked for in the UK, wouldn't allow us to charge O2 in the hangar.
allthatglitters is offline  
Old 29th November 2004 | 15:28
  #13 (permalink)  
Thought police antagonist
Community Builder
Community Influencer
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Aviation Qualifications: LAME
Posts: 1,574
Likes: 349
From: Where I always have been...firmly in the real world
I can see the arguments for and against here--and personally I would, and have been, more than happy to replenish the system in a Hangar---if you follow the basic and well established procedures the process is safe enough after all. My concern about removing a bottle is that you are opening up a system with all the inherent risks of ingress and contamination. Likewise, the removal --transfer to a bay--replenish-- test--certify--etc all adds to the overall cost for a simple replenishment in-situ. I can see the response about one fire etc. is more expensive---but I feel the O2 incident statistics would not support this. At least from what I can recall that is. Anybody know the last major oxygen incident that caused a hull loss ?.

Milt--you raised an interesting point about body oil etc---I am sure the RAF did an investigation along these lines a few years ago--but can't recall the findings. And on a personal level, I have always thought LOX was more hazardous than gaseous oxygen anyway.
Krystal n chips is offline  
Old 29th November 2004 | 16:03
  #14 (permalink)  
Cunning Artificer
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,125
Likes: 7
From: The spiritual home of DeHavilland
The Vulcan B Mk2 strategic (nuclear) bomber had a Rover Gas Turbine Airborne Auxiliary Power Unit (AAPU) In flight it was started by firing a pyrotechnic starter cartridge through the compressor to spin it up, then discharging oxygen directly into the compressor while applying fuel and ignition. The oxygen charging point and the oil filler cap were co-located under the same access panel, with the two charging points being about four inches apart. The Vulcan B Mk2 remained in service for more than thirty years and despite the AAPU oil and oxygen being replenished on every pre-flight and daily check, not once did we ever have an oxygen fire or explosion due to this arrangement.

As I said earlier, 'Much ado about nothing'. Oxygen charging on the line or in the hangar is perfectly safe as long as you follow the laid down procedures.
Blacksheep is offline  
Old 7th December 2004 | 12:18
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: istanbul / TURKEY
Thumbs down

its not allowed to charge any o2 bottles at turkish airlines we use readly charged o2 bottles.
knightdriver is offline  
Old 13th December 2004 | 01:10
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 1998
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: Fl USA
On our USAF aircraft we service the LOX system outside but we service the portable bottles on board.
gaterbait is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.