Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Dunnunda, Godzone and the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Flying Schools and Public Liability

Wikiposts
Search
Dunnunda, Godzone and the Pacific An independent family of forums covering all aspects of the Australian/NZ aviation scene.

Flying Schools and Public Liability

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st May 2002, 09:21
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Vic
Age: 56
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Flying Schools and Public Liability

Was just watching A Current Affair who showed a story on a clown who entertained children in a Dubbo shopping centre. He is about to close his business when his public liabilty policy runs out and will not be renewed by his insurance company.

So where does this leave flying schools, instructors and other pilots......private or commercial? We are yet to see or hear of huge increases in pubic liabilty premiums for aviation businesses but I bet they are just around the corner. I just wonder how many business will simply close once hit with thes e huge premiums.

Can an instructor who is an employee be sued personally in the event of an accident, can he be sued perhaps 20 years down the track.

What about instructors that are forced to work as contractors by some schools. Does ths schools public liability insurence cover them or do they need their own.......in that case the cost could make it not viable to instruct.

Any ideas anyone??
Ozgrade3 is offline  
Old 21st May 2002, 09:52
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unhappy

I hate to say it but Aussie is getting more and more like the US every day
Indy Cleo is offline  
Old 21st May 2002, 10:28
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Brisvegas
Posts: 3,883
Likes: 0
Received 246 Likes on 106 Posts
This is from the Pilots (GA) Award 1998, it is available on line at http://www.osiris.gov.au

29.6 Pilot indemnity

A pilot will not be required to pay for damage or loss of aircraft or equipment used in the service nor will any lien or other claim be made by the employer upon the pilot's estate. Any claim made by any member of the public, passenger or other person upon the pilot's estate as a result of any accident or happening caused by the pilot when duly performing their nominated duty, whether efficiently or, as may be subsequently determined, negligently, will be accepted as a claim made against the employer. The employer will be solely responsible for all claims as a result of operations by or travel in their aircraft. The foregoing will not apply to a pilot who knowingly performs their nominated duty in a manner contrary to law or the employer's policy.


This covers Pilots employed under the award.Check the list of "roped in" companies in the award.

Contractors is a can of worms.

Icarus2001 is online now  
Old 21st May 2002, 11:35
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: The Emerald City of Oz
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Precisely why I don't believe the "PPL Instructors" idea isn't going to be feasible.
VictorBravo is offline  
Old 22nd May 2002, 00:55
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Camden, NSW, Australia
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just got my insurance quote. The same company charges virtually the same price. Another is a dad cheaper. So insurance wise I can't see a problem. As for customers suing instructors. That has always been the case. Read in the award "The foregoing will not apply to a pilot who knowingly performs their nominated duty in a manner contrary to law or the employer's policy." You might have to spend $$$$$$$ arguing in court that you "did not knowingly.......". They'll tell you "you should have known" etc.
I Fly is offline  
Old 22nd May 2002, 02:11
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Well it's an IRS nowdays, but the AHRS were fun.
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The quicker Australians give up being wannabe Americans the better.
#1AHRS is offline  
Old 22nd May 2002, 02:53
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 44
Received 5 Likes on 1 Post
Thumbs down

I was speaking with two medical professionals who happen to be students of mine about this topic just recently. They informed me that a recent study found Victoria to be the 2nd most litigious state in the WORLD. Second only to NSW. This apparently both in terms of number of actions and payouts awarded by the courts.

Unfortunately it's already way beyond saying " We're going down the same path as the Americans!"

Sadly we left them behind long ago
YMML is offline  
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.