Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Dunnunda, Godzone and the Pacific
Reload this Page >

News:Govt.rejection fails to deter Fox/Lew

Wikiposts
Search
Dunnunda, Godzone and the Pacific An independent family of forums covering all aspects of the Australian/NZ aviation scene.

News:Govt.rejection fails to deter Fox/Lew

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Nov 2001, 16:11
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Townsville,Nth Queensland
Posts: 2,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post News:Govt.rejection fails to deter Fox/Lew

Posted :Tue, 27 Nov 2001 20:47 AEDT

Govt rejection fails to deter Fox & Lew

Melbourne businessmen Lindsay Fox and Solomon Lew say they are still committed to buying Ansett, despite the Federal Government's rejection of their key demands.

Federal Cabinet has decided not to meet the consortium's requests for tougher competition laws and a share of the Government travel contract.

The Fox-Lew consortium says while it is seeking clarification on Cabinet's decision, it remains unambiguously committed to Ansett.

The consortium says it intends to continue working with Ansett's administrators to finalise the sale of the troubled airline.
Wirraway is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2001, 16:34
  #2 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Townsville,Nth Queensland
Posts: 2,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

MELBOURNE (Dow Jones)--Australian businessmen Lindsay Fox and Solomon Lew late Tuesday said they remain "unambiguously committed" to buying struggling Australian airline Ansett Australia.

But the two businessmen, who have teamed under the banner of Tesna Holdings to be the preferred bidder for Ansett, said they want clarification from the Australian government on competition issues and government passenger business.



Earlier Tuesday, the government refused to fully meet Tesna's requests for special concessions on such issues.

However, Tesna said it wants clarification on the government's plans for protecting competition in the domestic aviation market. It also wants to know how much of Ansett's previous government business will be restored.

Last year Ansett received A$112 million of government business, out of a government travel budget of A$290 million, Tesna said.

"The request for a commitment for government business seeks the restoration of some of the government business previously held by Ansett, and it shouldn't be represented as either new business or a taxpayer subsidy," Tesna said.

Tesna said it also wants to know more about the voluntary code of conduct, especially whether it is enforceable. It also expressed concerns over the possibility of Qantas being responsible for drawing up the code.

"It is our understanding that such a code may be developed by Qantas, rather than the industry or government," Tesna said.

-By Andrew Trounson; Dow Jones Newswires; 61-3-9614-2664; [email protected]
Wirraway is offline  
Old 28th Nov 2001, 00:29
  #3 (permalink)  
lame
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Question

Which part of "NO" don't they understand..........
 
Old 28th Nov 2001, 01:33
  #4 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
fish

Although I liked this little dummy spit on ninemsn

Fox scathing about Ansett 'backflip'

Transport magnate Lindsay Fox has accused the federal government of trying to kill Ansett after it failed to offer strong support to help relaunch the airline.

Mr Fox alluded to a link between the government's decision and a late play for some of Ansett's assets by Lang Corp's chief executive Chris Corrigan and Virgin Blue, the Australian Financial Review reported.

"I think ultimately, the government might want Ansett to die," Mr Fox said after briefing staff in Sydney following the government's cold response.

"You've got to look at all the things they've said, and why they have changed, what created the change and what created Mr Corrigan coming into the ring at the last minute."

But Mr Fox and bid partner Solomon Lew said they remained committed to their plan to get Ansett back in the air.

Cabinet earlier rejected their request to strengthen competition laws to protect Ansett from Qantas and the government refused to commit a large share of its travel budget to Ansett, the Financial Review said.

"There were two (things) that (the government) were going to help with, which they believed they could have done Thursday. Today is Tuesday and they've done a backflip," Mr Fox said.

"This was going to be the first thing fixed after the election. Somebody should work out what fixed means or how to spell fixed."

A spokeswoman for Lang Corp declined to offer any comment to the newspaper
Whilst I continue to feel sorry for the staff, there is something kind of ironic when a multi million dollar businessman is asking from protection from QF on one hand to in the interests of a level playing field yet has a list of demands that make it far from a level playing field.
Keg is offline  
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.