Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Dunnunda, Godzone and the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Virgin dumps Mt Isa route

Wikiposts
Search
Dunnunda, Godzone and the Pacific An independent family of forums covering all aspects of the Australian/NZ aviation scene.

Virgin dumps Mt Isa route

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Dec 2001, 06:04
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Australia
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Theo,

Make sure you get your figures correct before stating like you have.

AN had a 140-145 seat A320 going to Isa.
VB have a 160-165 seat 737 going to Isa. The way I see it is your percentages are a little out.

QFlink (& I stand to be corrected) are serviceing Isa with a 70 seat 146 twice a day. That's approx about 140 seats per day.

Just a suggestion, but I think your figures may need to be adjusted, especially seem as though VB has the greatest capacity out of anyone going to Isa in recent times.

Cheers
polo is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2001, 06:59
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Sorry all, points about 146s considered and head pulled in! However I was making rough statements about loadings based on a 150 seat A320 and a 144 seat 737-700 hence the slight drop in capacity mentioned.

It was quite often discussed in the past that seperate am and pm services would be far more convenient for Isa residents. DJ's one type philosophy will obviously be a disadvantage for regional centres.

It poses the question that had Qantas offered a morning or evening 64 seat jet service at current pricing levels in the past would they have received good support?

One would assume the answer to be "Yes".

If so why didnt they? Will we see a return to a less convenient but more cost efficient one service a day and a price hike?

There's no doubt about it, VERY deep pockets and a huge fleet to move around where ever competition calls for it will make it very difficult for DJ and Ansett Version X.

Keeping a loss making new service on such routes just long enough after the other guy has pulled out will be the only tricky thing for Geoff to do.

Removing it too quickly will alert Mr Fels while staying there too long will hurt the bottom line and allow the others to increase their fleets and consequently their flexibility.

[ 07 December 2001: Message edited by: Theo Racle ]
Theo Racle is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2001, 10:42
  #23 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Townsville,Nth Queensland
Posts: 2,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

The Mackay service is iffy at best, VB
should just stick to the trunks although
Townsville is going fine with 2 services
a day.
Wirraway is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2001, 18:27
  #24 (permalink)  

Evertonian
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: #3117# Ppruner of the Year Nominee 2005
Posts: 12,532
Received 106 Likes on 60 Posts
Wink

Interesting figures. Thanks Keg. I want ask you to verify & cross check that info!!

I guess the load factor comparison to last year (DOM) is down because of the increased capacity. Vice-versa with (INTL). WRT available discounted seats, if you offer 25 seats on a 737, but still offer 25 seats on a 763, you haven't reduced the available discounted seats have you? Now, of course, if you showed it as a percentage.... Bluddy bean counters!!
Buster Hyman is offline  
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.