Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Dunnunda, Godzone and the Pacific
Reload this Page >

AN/QF Collusion ????

Wikiposts
Search
Dunnunda, Godzone and the Pacific An independent family of forums covering all aspects of the Australian/NZ aviation scene.

AN/QF Collusion ????

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th Aug 2001, 10:58
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Caloundra. Qld. Australia
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs down AN/QF Collusion ????

I'm extremely surprised that no one has jumped on the wagon about this (unless of course I have missed it).

Saw the tail end of a story on the 9 Today show Friday morning.....Seems that QF & AN no longer offer the "Under 3 Free On Your Knee".....The upshot of what I saw, and I must admit I only saw the tail end, was that QF decided to end this Service ??, and within 10 minutes, AN had jumped on the wagon with the same deal.

Now the normally press conscious QF & AN have both declined to be interviewed although both denied any collusion and I did hear something about VB not stepping up to the mark to deny that they will undertake the same.

Anyone care to comment and/or elaborate ???

(edit in bold italics)

[ 25 August 2001: Message edited by: nasa ]

[ 25 August 2001: Message edited by: nasa ]
nasa is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2001, 11:48
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Devonport Tasmania Australia
Posts: 1,837
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs down

Nothing new in the zoo nasa - when I worked for TAA Res in Melbourne, we would grab a quick steak sambo and a few beers at Macs - in between TN and AN. When our pricing guys were there at lunchtime with the AN pricing guys having a few beers and a feed together the word immediately went out that a fare hike was imminent. Nothing has changed. It never failed to happen.
Eastwest Loco is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2001, 15:22
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Oz
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

nasa, check out the Reg's on ascertaining the weight of an aircraft does not exceed published limits. Particularly the use of 'standard' passenger weights.

For that matter the press and 'the other interested party' could do well to do so as well.

Being Saturday, I'm not about to look up the Act and the CAR's, that's a workday job! Besides I don't feel inclined to do their job for them.

ding
PS there's no collusion in this just compliance with national aviation regulations.
dingo084 is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2001, 16:41
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Tasmania
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angel

Dunno about QF but AN advised employees about 6 weeks or so ago that the ages were changing as of a date I can't remember in August which was a couple of weeks ago, to put AN in line with international and Star Alliance standards. The media have only just caught on to it a couple of weeks after the fact.
AN have also reinstated the Seniors fare but with more restrictions and tougher id requirements.
Fox Fire is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2001, 17:22
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Red face

Typical knee-jerk media-driven reaction to a normal commercial decision.

If 2 of the 3 national carriers decide to move in-line with International stndards it is hardly a matter for the ACCC.

Fels, have a look at the rights and wrongs of the Privatisation of sydney Airport.

If that isn't a government-created and protected monopoly, what is???


Elk Please notice than in deleting the inappropriate adjective you directed at Mr, sorry Prof Fels, I have managed to control my desire to send a few your way.

Please desist, otherwise I'll have to have a quiet word with your surrogate Dad, the Don Quixote of PPRuNe, and suggest where he should rutt the horns.

W

[ 26 August 2001: Message edited by: Woomera ]
Elk McPherson is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2001, 19:48
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Perth
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Perhaps those bemoaning this change should think about this.

What would happen with a chunky 3 year old flying through the cabin during a RTO !!

Funny how the media never mentioned it MAY be a SAFETY issue.
Pedal To The Metal is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2001, 04:03
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Red face

I think it is a great idea to introduce fares onto those noisey, usually smelly things we all seem to have and detest any body else having, partic, on an aeroplane. If you have ever endured a sydney to perth flight with a small child next to you, you usually end up holding the baby at some stage, so whats wrong with the kids having their own seat, I for one did NOT pay for mine to share it with anothers child. This might sound harsh, but you watch the faces of passengers when a parent carries a small child on board any flight,and the relief on the same faces when the parent walks past their seat...as for the collusion between AN and QF, has any body tried to get a reduced price ticket lately, even the conditions are almost word for word.
Anyway, it is not the subject of this thread, but the looming demise of AN should put a stop to this.
pedalezy is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2001, 15:03
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Oztralia, near MEL
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Arrow

Collusion

How little you know.......

Yes you too Eastwest Loco
Feeton Terrafirma is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2001, 15:20
  #9 (permalink)  

PPRuNette
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: de nile...
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Pedalezy....thank goodness you were never a child

GoGirl
GoGirl is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2001, 17:15
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

GOGIRL..Of course I had a childhood,(and a good one) but my parents had the courtesy to keep me away from an aircraft cabin until I was about four years old..
pedalezy is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2001, 23:56
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: brisbane, australia
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

pedalezy,
took my 2yo DRW to BNE "on the lap" and with some serious bribery, he was very well behaved. also brought many a smile from the punters who all seemed tired of looking at the back of the seats in front of them.
we went to the cockpit and he was more interested in a gas bottle looking thing behind the pilots seat than anything else in there.

BTW i'd gladly put him on his own seat if you forward the funds to me. or perhaps you'd prefer to put him on the road for 3 or 4 days so it doesn't spoil your trip. i'm sure you'll keep to your word when you have one.
huntsman is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2001, 13:32
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

There is a compliance aspect to the decision, related to a CASA review of standard weights, and it has been the case with QF and AN international for some time; one could wonder about the previous regime where an international 3YO weighed more than a domestic.

Pity AN didn't push this line at the time, but they are rather busy with other matters. Also a pity that one can't easily arrange for one or another standard weight to fall on Fels (and be quite sure about using His title - the man has some bogus claims in the public domain!)

Cheers
32bits is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2001, 14:59
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

32 bits is quite right as this is indeed a compliance issue, the airlines quoted are attempting to cash in on this, by introducing the extension of the childs fare to include two year olds. It will be interesting to see if VB follow suit or continue to place families with toddlers near spare seats on their flights, (which was sort of a practice when I flew with my little darlings with both QF and AN). Yes I do have kids of my own, my earlier post was indeed only an attempt by me in a little black humour. Sorry huntsman and go girl, I did not think people on this site would have been so thinned skinned
pedalezy is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2001, 15:12
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Australasia
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Post

Doesn't international only apply outside Australia? Or have I missed something. Australia has so many differences for Domestic Ops already. Surely something where the public are ahead in one area is OK. Seems the costcutting pressure may be biting and looking for ways to get extra $ wherever possible.
CockpitJunkie is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2001, 15:32
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: YMML
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

So now parents are paying for the seat for the littlies,will the airlines now provide suitable child seats/restraints to protect them.A lap sash is not suitable or legal in a car for children 3 and under so it surely must be unsafe in an aircraft.
aiming point is offline  
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.