Wikiposts
Search
Dunnunda, Godzone and the Pacific An independent family of forums covering all aspects of the Australian/NZ aviation scene.

oz/ us/ uk atpl?

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th Mar 2002, 02:59
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Nulla
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post oz/ us/ uk atpl?

I think alot of us here in Oz agree that the US ATPL is easy to get for various reasons. We tend to look down on it's legitamacy.. .. .The Oz ATPL theory as well as our airspace has been revamped over the years to conform to the ICAO standards.. .. .Why is it that the UK CAA, even under the JAR, are still not recognising our qualifications as one for one? I can understand the need for flight testing and airlaw but it seems to me just a revenue raising exersise for there system and possibly to protect there own jobs. It seems that the rest of Europe has come in to line with the UK.. .. .Why is it so easy for the poms to get an Oz conversion? Why don't we make them do an approved flying training program for the CPL if they don't have 500hrs P1/ICUS/P2 on a multi crew aircraft, their I/R theory and flight test again and then complete the Oz ATPL or CPL theory. On top of that we could charge them a fortune just to process the licence, lets say $1,500. Sounds just huh. That's some serious processing.. .. .Do they look down on our training syllabus or regard ours as inferior as we do the US? At least we don't down load the answers off the net. . .. .Anyway, should our ATPL theory be harder and more involved than it already is. What would the UK CAA like to see so that we and other counties could share a 1 for 1 on theory credits.
shaablamm is offline  
Old 11th Mar 2002, 08:33
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 1998
Location: Formerly of Nam
Posts: 1,595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Red face

Shaab Ive been pushin for a bloodey One World ATP for years! Lobbying ICAO but of course nothins every been achieved. But dont fall into the trap of tit-for-tat penalty exercises ("Why don't we make them...."). Thats a typical bureaucrat and politician thought-process. They are the "we" and "them" not us, and theres nothin you or I can do to change there minds since they represent provincial vested interests not Aviation. If pilots had control of ICAO instead of these morons we would probabley have a World ATP established between Contracting States by now.. .. .I will say the old UK ATP theory was pretty bloodey thorough, but its difficulty level was just the same as that in Oz.
Slasher is offline  
Old 11th Mar 2002, 09:02
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 127
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Post

Slasher, I reckon the main difficulty in the old UK syllabus was the way you had to pass not only each subject but also the majority of subjects in each group at the first sitting for it to count; and your right,it wasn't the content so much as the quantity and depth of the subjects.. .. .Shaablaam, unfortunately if you want to play in their backyard you have to play by their rules. I was told once that back in the days of closer relationships with the UK there was a move to allow recognition/straight swap of OZ/UK licences but it was vetoed by the then DCA( but this may only be a rumour).Also, be advised that in regard to the 500hrs of multi crew it has to be on an aircraft type that is on their (ie UK) register to avoid the MCC requirement;I was lucky that they had one of my mutli crew types, otherwise it was off to the MCC course for me; and you'd be surprised what they don't have on their register.. . . . <small>[ 11 March 2002, 05:04: Message edited by: Seaeagle109 ]</small>
Seaeagle109 is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2002, 08:32
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Nulla
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Slasher, thanx for bringing me back to reality, your right. I was a little suprised and by the time I started typing, furious.. .. .Seaeagle 109, you have obviously succeeded in obtaining the conversion. I unfortunatly have to deal with the long way through the process, although thankfully not the longest. May I ask where you did it, what the course was like, correspondence/full time and what the flight testing was all about?. .. .Thanx in advance....
shaablamm is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2002, 12:51
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Paradise
Age: 68
Posts: 1,556
Received 52 Likes on 20 Posts
Post

On the subject of licence conversions..............has anyone ever converted an Oz ATPL to a US ATPL? If so, what is involved? Do you still have to do their exams + flight test?
chimbu warrior is online now  
Old 13th Mar 2002, 01:24
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 127
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Post

Shaablamm,. .. .I did the theory in Adelaide with British Aerospace in 1999, unfortunately you can't do a UK licence anymore it has to be a JAA. I was required do a GFT( in YPAD) and IR(UK, but fortunately on an "as required" basis) to complete the licence, also I had to do the initial medical in the UK( you used to be able to do that in Oz but not now/ renewals are OK).. .. .I was able to do this because I started before the cutoff date back in 1999 before the current system(ie JAA) came into place. There are exemptions available if you meet certain experience requirements; for detailed info try the UK CAA website. The thing is it costs alot of $$ to do the licence.. .. .Email me and I'll try to give you more detail. I have some details for theory schools/flight schools/ accomodation, etc.
Seaeagle109 is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2002, 01:52
  #7 (permalink)  

PPRuNe Handmaiden
 
Join Date: Feb 1997
Location: Duit On Mon Dei
Posts: 4,674
Received 58 Likes on 30 Posts
Arrow

Nearly finished the JAR ATPL conversion.. .If you have 500 hours + on multi crew operations, budget $A35,000. If not, budget $A50,000. Life over here ain't cheap if you aren't working.. .. .Keep an eye on the latest musings from the SRG-CAA website.
redsnail is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2002, 02:32
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Nulla
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Seaeagle 109 and redsnail, check your email...
shaablamm is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2002, 19:10
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 127
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Post

Shaablamm,. .. .If your from YSCB your email address didn't work; send me one that does and I'll resend.
Seaeagle109 is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2002, 21:47
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: london, uk
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Shaablaam. .. .I think you might be looking into the wrong end of the telescope mate. How many Brits are working for the airlines in Australia at present (not many I'll wager). . .Whereas European aviation has got Aussies crawling all over it (not just 89ers either) - which I dont mind, because the majority are good blokes. . .In the wider sense my area of West London is shortly to be renamed Adelaide on account of the literally thousands of Australians who dont seem to like Australia and want to hang out with all us whinging Poms!!. .. .So before you start trying to make it harder for other people to enter Australian aviation, just consider how the reverse process could affect not just you, but lots of other Australian aviators.
hereford united is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2002, 23:04
  #11 (permalink)  

PPRuNe Handmaiden
 
Join Date: Feb 1997
Location: Duit On Mon Dei
Posts: 4,674
Received 58 Likes on 30 Posts
Post

Hereford,. .There are many Brits working for the airlines and charter companies in Australia. They either emigrated, married an Australian or have an Australian parent.. .A conservative estimate would range from 10-25%.. .. .CASA doesn't make them do the full ATPL syllabus again.. .The difference between the JAR requirements and the CASA requirements are chalk and cheese.
redsnail is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2002, 03:18
  #12 (permalink)  
T
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: perth
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Yep Many Brits here, even the Director of Aviation Safety is an Expat Brit !!!!!!!!
T is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2002, 05:41
  #13 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Nulla
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Seaeagle109 and Redsnail, I've sent you a different email. Cheers gents.. .. .Hereford, I know there alot of ozzies there but as has already been said there are alot of Poms here. I don't have any gripe with that at all, quite the opposite in fact. All I, along with many others, would like is an international standard. To me it seems logical. . .. .I am just amazed that the worlds aviation authorities haven't sorted it out yet, especially countries like Aus, UK, US. Do we all have to come in to line with the JAA or lower the std as far as the US?. .. .The tone that probably comes accross in the initial post was simply because I was a bit bemused. No offence meant to anyone....
shaablamm is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2002, 11:43
  #14 (permalink)  

PPRuNe Handmaiden
 
Join Date: Feb 1997
Location: Duit On Mon Dei
Posts: 4,674
Received 58 Likes on 30 Posts
Question

Shaablaam,. .Gents??? <img border="0" title="" alt="[Embarrassed]" src="redface.gif" /> . .I think you will find answers to your questions in the other thread I posted ages ago.
redsnail is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2002, 12:54
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 127
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Talking

Well I am Reddo. . .. . <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="biggrin.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="biggrin.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="biggrin.gif" />
Seaeagle109 is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2002, 13:16
  #16 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Nulla
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

OH NO.. Sheesh I am sorry Reddo. Didn't look. Was enlightened by S.E 109. I gues thats why I always call everyone mate. Sorry mate.. .. .Got the other posts and S.E. thanx for all the info. Much appreciated. Will be getting started asap, albeit the long expensive way. Will be sure to contact you. . .. .CHEERS.
shaablamm is offline  
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.