Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Dunnunda, Godzone and the Pacific
Reload this Page >

NSW Air Ambulance contract

Wikiposts
Search
Dunnunda, Godzone and the Pacific An independent family of forums covering all aspects of the Australian/NZ aviation scene.

NSW Air Ambulance contract

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Feb 2002, 14:36
  #21 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

Ramjager. .Yes, the King Air does carry two stretchers but, not two standard ambulance stretchers as does the PC12. <img src="rolleyes.gif" border="0"> <img src="rolleyes.gif" border="0"> <img src="rolleyes.gif" border="0">
PPRuNeUser0161 is offline  
Old 18th Feb 2002, 15:51
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 743
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Gents

Bear in mind that the Tassie RFDS aircraft crosses water operating to Mel and Syd. In this case the twin engine King Air is more feasible, and more acceptable to the ambulance union.
Dog One is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2002, 04:48
  #23 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Arrow

I hear that Central section were requested to provide a PC12 for inspection at Sydney a week or two ago. Anyone care to elaborate on how it was received?

Looks like the writing is on the wall hear chaps.

PPRuNeUser0161 is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2002, 05:07
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: oz
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

The standard ambulance stretchers aren't maintained to aviation standards anyway so it makes no difference.
alky is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2002, 11:32
  #25 (permalink)  

PPRuNe's Paramedic
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: tropical north
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angel

guys and gals, just curiosity here but arent the stretcher assemblies used in each of the king air contracts different. For example, out of sydney the NSW stretcher assemblies in the amblulances and planes are different to say the NT. The NSW assemblies allow for a stretcher base to be easily tranferred with patient, where as here the king airs have a slightly different setup where the patient has to wAlk, be carried or tranferred between the lift and the ambulance stretcher on a spinal scoop, slide-board or sheet.

The aircraft interiors will depend on the assemblies the ambulance provider has. Both work well so long as everyone is prepared. The NT version has slightly more risk in some respects to the crews.

Its not very often up here ambo crews fly so we have very little say in the aircraft contracts. NT health supplies the nursing staff and I believe it is a similar system where NSW air ambulance provides the registered flight nurses not the contractor. The paramedics may fly from time to time with helos but rarely on the fixed wings. So all in all, I guess the accountants will have the final say.

The Kingairs supplied by NSW air ambulance were clocking up some hours then, but they were beautifully maintained.

Me, I dont mind either way... single or twin. So long as its easy to load / unload, safe for the patients, fast, quiet and easy for pilots to operate.
Northern Chique is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2002, 02:55
  #26 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Arrow

I have information that its looking more and more like a PC12 fleet or at best a mixed fleet of at least two PC12's and one B200, all brand new aircraft. This is not a prefered option though.. .. .The new PC12's in Central section are currently being fitted for standard stretchers however they may not be able to trade stretchers maintained to uncontrolled standards. The new PC12's TAS at about 255kts at 25000ft Vs a new King Air at 280kts. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="biggrin.gif" />
PPRuNeUser0161 is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2002, 11:42
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Australia
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs down

Given that many pilots are struggling to handle just one inflight emergency at a time, can anyone tell me where a PC12 operator may find enough ace pilots capable of handling the multiple emergency that faces said intrepid aces when the noise stops in the dark.. .Think about your last renewal. Could you confidently handle an engine failure, loss of pressurisation, diversion to alternate strip,key up PAL lights and dead stick landing, not to mention dead stick instrument approach all at once ? And more to the point, I bet you'd reckon your checker was a real prick if he expected you to do so.. .Lovely toy, just a pity gravity wins when the motor quits. Wouldn't want my kids on board in IMC.
justfun is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2002, 13:04
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Not the beach
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Zed. .. .And your point is...............?
Beech Boy is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2002, 13:11
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: The Swamp
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Zed, . . Are you trying you tell me that it has a new aerodynamic means of staying aloft with no noise maker?
ICURA? is offline  
Old 10th Mar 2002, 01:47
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Qld or NT
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Even if the B200 wins this time, it will most likely be the last battle. I'm afraid the writing is on the wall.. .. .Just look at all of the new generation aircraft on the horizon (Eclipse, Venture, Cirrus ST50, Explorer 750T & the PC12 lookalike - Ae270 IBIS etc etc). Most of the new generation aircraft are either single PT6 or single turbofan.. .. .Like it or not - the single engine 6-16 seater is the future.
Sunland is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2002, 18:47
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Actually justfun, if you can get a hold of the RFDS or Aboriginal Air Services PC-12 Operations Manual, you will learn that a standard proficiency check covers all the events covered in your scenario happening at the same time (bar the depressurisation)! The anticipated cabin pressure bleed down rate and aircraft glide performance, apart from a catastrophic failure of some part of the pressure vessel, gives ample time to slip an oxy mask on etc. The scenario you paint is not that much of a demanding drama in this machine as you might imagine it to be. I consider myself to be an average pilot who received good training on the machine. Recency is the key. Please talk to a current PC-12 pilot about operating the machine. You will be reassured.
Old Man Emu is offline  
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.