Role of John Howard in the AN tragedy
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2000
Location: OZ
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Role of John Howard in the AN tragedy
I have reproduced the following article from the Aust Fin Rev (a world respected financial paper) published in the saturday edition. It is reproduced word for word. I have always thought that our PM had a very large effect in the collapse of Ansett. Now it seems that my suspicions are very much confirmed. He has now lost my vote in November. It is an absolute disgrace.......i hope u all agree..........!!!!!........& dont vote for him either. My early anger at Anderson on reading the article below may have been somewhat misplaced.
It reads............
The PM John Howard ruthlessly overrode senior miniters who favoured a singapore airlines plan to recapitalise ansett - a move that was to extinguish the last hope of survival of the airline.
An investigation by the Australian Financial Review reveals he had been successfully lobied by Qantas which wanted protection from an aggressive Singapore Airlines. Standing behind Howard in his strong backing for Qantas was his department head , Mr Max Moore-Wilton who served on the Australian Airlines board in the early 1990's when Mr Geoff Dixon was also a senior executive
Qantas's strategy was to block Singapore from gaining control of Air NZ and therefore Ansett, which it argued would becomea behemoth with the power to crush the national carrier.
Instead Qantas wanted to buy 25% or Air NZ and for Singapore to buy Ansett
Yet SIA Chief DR Cheong publicly rejected rejected the Qantas proposal on Monday July 30 , the day before a crrucial cabinet meeting to finally decide the australian governments position.
At that meeting, senior ministers including John Anderson & Peter Costello had been prepared to argue the case for the so-called Singapore option.
Ansett executives have told the AFR that the night before the meeting , Mr Anderson had told them he still preferred the SIA proposal.
But Anderson position in the cabinet meeting was undermined because his close ally, Costello, was unable to attend the meeting because thick fog prevented his plane from landing.
A Government sourse said Mr Costello was "incadescent with rage" at Howards intervention to back the Qantas proposal, which in effect killed the only viable recapitalisation plan then available to save ansett.
The PM's intervention helped seal Ansett's fate. Mr Anderson was obliged to travel to Wellington imediately after the cabinet meeting to convey the Australian Governments position surpporting Qantas. Ansett collapsed just weeks later.
Mr Howard had been persauded to torpedo the Singapore Airlines proposal by intensive lobbying from Mr Dixon and the Qantas Chairman, Ms Margaret Jackson.
Ansett executives have also confirmed to the AFR that Mr Moore-Wilton told Air NZ Chief, Mr Gary Toomey, at a meeting in Canberraon August 10 that "he didn't give a **** about Ansett" and said that the Government was doing everything it could to protect Qantasbecause it wasthe only truly Australian Airline.
Mr Howard himself explained his support for the Qantas proposal on September 18 when he told parliment: "The Government did unashamedly have a preference for what was called the Qantas option for quite some time - quite unashamedly-because we took the view that, if you are going to have two airlines, it would be a good idea that one of them was Australian owned.
But despite clear advice from Air NZ executives that Ansett was in dire financial trouble - losing $18 million per week - Mr Howard chose to rely on advice from Qantas that Ansett was close to returning to profitability.
During the week the Govt, faced with the heavy political fall out from the collapse, provided financial gauarntees to enable an emasculated airline to restart.
But there is no certainty that the airline will survive in the long term.
Thoughts folks............!!!!!!!
It reads............
The PM John Howard ruthlessly overrode senior miniters who favoured a singapore airlines plan to recapitalise ansett - a move that was to extinguish the last hope of survival of the airline.
An investigation by the Australian Financial Review reveals he had been successfully lobied by Qantas which wanted protection from an aggressive Singapore Airlines. Standing behind Howard in his strong backing for Qantas was his department head , Mr Max Moore-Wilton who served on the Australian Airlines board in the early 1990's when Mr Geoff Dixon was also a senior executive
Qantas's strategy was to block Singapore from gaining control of Air NZ and therefore Ansett, which it argued would becomea behemoth with the power to crush the national carrier.
Instead Qantas wanted to buy 25% or Air NZ and for Singapore to buy Ansett
Yet SIA Chief DR Cheong publicly rejected rejected the Qantas proposal on Monday July 30 , the day before a crrucial cabinet meeting to finally decide the australian governments position.
At that meeting, senior ministers including John Anderson & Peter Costello had been prepared to argue the case for the so-called Singapore option.
Ansett executives have told the AFR that the night before the meeting , Mr Anderson had told them he still preferred the SIA proposal.
But Anderson position in the cabinet meeting was undermined because his close ally, Costello, was unable to attend the meeting because thick fog prevented his plane from landing.
A Government sourse said Mr Costello was "incadescent with rage" at Howards intervention to back the Qantas proposal, which in effect killed the only viable recapitalisation plan then available to save ansett.
The PM's intervention helped seal Ansett's fate. Mr Anderson was obliged to travel to Wellington imediately after the cabinet meeting to convey the Australian Governments position surpporting Qantas. Ansett collapsed just weeks later.
Mr Howard had been persauded to torpedo the Singapore Airlines proposal by intensive lobbying from Mr Dixon and the Qantas Chairman, Ms Margaret Jackson.
Ansett executives have also confirmed to the AFR that Mr Moore-Wilton told Air NZ Chief, Mr Gary Toomey, at a meeting in Canberraon August 10 that "he didn't give a **** about Ansett" and said that the Government was doing everything it could to protect Qantasbecause it wasthe only truly Australian Airline.
Mr Howard himself explained his support for the Qantas proposal on September 18 when he told parliment: "The Government did unashamedly have a preference for what was called the Qantas option for quite some time - quite unashamedly-because we took the view that, if you are going to have two airlines, it would be a good idea that one of them was Australian owned.
But despite clear advice from Air NZ executives that Ansett was in dire financial trouble - losing $18 million per week - Mr Howard chose to rely on advice from Qantas that Ansett was close to returning to profitability.
During the week the Govt, faced with the heavy political fall out from the collapse, provided financial gauarntees to enable an emasculated airline to restart.
But there is no certainty that the airline will survive in the long term.
Thoughts folks............!!!!!!!
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There is no doubt that the Australian Government was ultimately responsible for putting Ansett to death.
Their "backflip" in August, supporting a mythical Qantas proposal just strengthened the resolve of the xenophobic Kiwis to do nothing. After about 11 months of the same, their final inaction was fatal.
As Gary Toomey indicated in correspondence at the time, the Australian Government were clearly confusing the national interest with Qantas's corporate interests.
Effective lobbying no doubt - but Government incompetence (on both sides of the Tasman) at its finest!
It makes little difference, but for the first time, they've lost my vote.
Their "backflip" in August, supporting a mythical Qantas proposal just strengthened the resolve of the xenophobic Kiwis to do nothing. After about 11 months of the same, their final inaction was fatal.
As Gary Toomey indicated in correspondence at the time, the Australian Government were clearly confusing the national interest with Qantas's corporate interests.
Effective lobbying no doubt - but Government incompetence (on both sides of the Tasman) at its finest!
It makes little difference, but for the first time, they've lost my vote.
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: OZ
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I suppose that because I missed out last night, I should blame it on John Howard.
Grow up.
AN had $600m in the bank when purchased by Air New Zealand. Now AN has debts of $2b.
Air New Zealand bit off more than it could chew and we now see the results.
Go figure.
It is time people (boards, in this case)took responsibility for what happens and not blame everything on the Govt.
Grow up.
AN had $600m in the bank when purchased by Air New Zealand. Now AN has debts of $2b.
Air New Zealand bit off more than it could chew and we now see the results.
Go figure.
It is time people (boards, in this case)took responsibility for what happens and not blame everything on the Govt.
If there was votes in it, there would still be an Ansett today.Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Metung RSL or Collingwood Social Club on weekends!
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You would have to be one very confused Prime Minister to put the interests of a foreign owned airline against those of an Australian owned one.
I agree that the demise of Ansett was very sad and will have a short term adverse effect (in economic terms) on Australia but the voters will realise that John Howard put Qantas (Australian owned) ahead of Ansett (New Zealand owned) because it was in the best interest for AUSTRALIA.
Suppose SQ had bought 25% share in Air NZ and pumped millions of dollars into Ansett. Brand new aircraft and a re-filled war chest to fight Qantas and Virgin. Then two years down the track it was QANTAS who ended up like Ansett is today. I would suggest that the Financial Review would really have something to write about and not some cheap,pinko,rabble rousing editorial to try and get Beazley off the mat.
No - I shall be voting Liberal and there will be many millions of Australians doing the same thing on the 10th November because Howard made the right decision he put
AUSTRALIA first!
[ 01 October 2001: Message edited by: Whiskery ]
I agree that the demise of Ansett was very sad and will have a short term adverse effect (in economic terms) on Australia but the voters will realise that John Howard put Qantas (Australian owned) ahead of Ansett (New Zealand owned) because it was in the best interest for AUSTRALIA.
Suppose SQ had bought 25% share in Air NZ and pumped millions of dollars into Ansett. Brand new aircraft and a re-filled war chest to fight Qantas and Virgin. Then two years down the track it was QANTAS who ended up like Ansett is today. I would suggest that the Financial Review would really have something to write about and not some cheap,pinko,rabble rousing editorial to try and get Beazley off the mat.
No - I shall be voting Liberal and there will be many millions of Australians doing the same thing on the 10th November because Howard made the right decision he put
AUSTRALIA first!
[ 01 October 2001: Message edited by: Whiskery ]
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Oz government is not responsible for AN going down the tubes. But it sure as hell was in a position to do something about it at an earlier stage.
As the good doc from up north warned about a month ago - something had better be done or AN will be gone.
Nothing was done.
As the good doc from up north warned about a month ago - something had better be done or AN will be gone.
Nothing was done.
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Metung RSL or Collingwood Social Club on weekends!
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ahhh gaunty - as usual,very quick on the uptake and touchee.
Congratulations to the Lions, I don't follow either team but was barracking for the Brissy boys as I can't stand the Essendon supporters arrogance!
BTW, I did say home of aussie rules NOT the Premiership Cup..........ah what the heck, you got me!
Congratulations to the Lions, I don't follow either team but was barracking for the Brissy boys as I can't stand the Essendon supporters arrogance!
BTW, I did say home of aussie rules NOT the Premiership Cup..........ah what the heck, you got me!
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Howard is not responible for Ansetts demise.
Incompetent management,1980s cost structures and New Zealand revenge for the underarm atrocity are to blame. Ansett was a dinosaur which managed to stumble into the new millenium only to be dragged down by a lean mean efficent VB. Ansett people should stop whinging and face the brave new world which the rest of us accepted (like it or not) years ago. No I don't work for VB, QF, or AN.
Incompetent management,1980s cost structures and New Zealand revenge for the underarm atrocity are to blame. Ansett was a dinosaur which managed to stumble into the new millenium only to be dragged down by a lean mean efficent VB. Ansett people should stop whinging and face the brave new world which the rest of us accepted (like it or not) years ago. No I don't work for VB, QF, or AN.
Evertonian
For my 2cents worth, I think when deregulation hit home, the Govt. of the day should've allowed QF & AN to be able to restructure themselves to a "leaner" operation similar to what DJ is now. Naturally, I would've been pessed off (as the kiwis say) if my conditions were eroded. When you change the rules during the game, it's only fair to allow the teams to adapt. I guess we'd be in a different world now if that happened.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So when a company owned by foreign interest's, which is mismanaged and possibly asset striped to a point where it's loosing 18 mil per week go's bust its the Australian
governments fault ? somehow I doubt that very much KYBO
Had SIA bought AN they would have had to make some very heavy cuts to the company
to get it viable, lots of jobs lost and pay reductions (perhaps not as many as the current unfortunate circumstances I concede). And you would be in here blaming Mr. Howard anyway, some bleeding heart lefty hacks from the press would undoubtedly blame the PM as well.
So where was the government of the day when compass (an Australian owned company)
went Bust ? Where was there government bail out and the regulation of fares, gee thats right - that was the government that called us “glorified bus drivers “ just a few years previously.
governments fault ? somehow I doubt that very much KYBO
Had SIA bought AN they would have had to make some very heavy cuts to the company
to get it viable, lots of jobs lost and pay reductions (perhaps not as many as the current unfortunate circumstances I concede). And you would be in here blaming Mr. Howard anyway, some bleeding heart lefty hacks from the press would undoubtedly blame the PM as well.
So where was the government of the day when compass (an Australian owned company)
went Bust ? Where was there government bail out and the regulation of fares, gee thats right - that was the government that called us “glorified bus drivers “ just a few years previously.
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Age: 84
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
May I respectfully point out to all PPRuNers thet, whilst I agree that AN was latterly a foreign-owned company, those of us employed therein paid our taxes to the Australian Taxation Office, NOT that of NZ.
It is not my intention to argue the merits, or otherwise, of the involvement of the Australian government, save to emphasise that Mr. Howard et al do not come out of the fiasco with lily-white hands.
Come November, I know where my vote will be going.
Kind regards to all,
TheNightOwl.
It is not my intention to argue the merits, or otherwise, of the involvement of the Australian government, save to emphasise that Mr. Howard et al do not come out of the fiasco with lily-white hands.
Come November, I know where my vote will be going.
Kind regards to all,
TheNightOwl.
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2000
Location: OZ
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey folks.......don't misunderstand me
I am not ONLY blaming Howard
Everybody involved has had a hand in this from the Air NZ board, BIL, SIA, NZ Govt & no doubt a few others
I just simply reproduced an article from the Fin Review
However Howard did delay the 49% deal with SIA at the 11th hour heavily promoting the QF proposal. He accepted BS advice from Dixon & then things turned sour
I am not ONLY blaming Howard
Everybody involved has had a hand in this from the Air NZ board, BIL, SIA, NZ Govt & no doubt a few others
I just simply reproduced an article from the Fin Review
However Howard did delay the 49% deal with SIA at the 11th hour heavily promoting the QF proposal. He accepted BS advice from Dixon & then things turned sour
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Page 69 - 3rd rock
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As for paying taxes, so did the 1300 89er's whose then government paid to have them put out of work, and facilitate the hiring of foreign scabs.
Unless you're the dirty digger, it doesn't mean much.
Unless you're the dirty digger, it doesn't mean much.
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Oz
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey KYBO.....so you believe everything that you read in a newspaper eh?...Give me a break!
I suppose you also believe everything that the ACTU and TWU are telling you at the "RA RA" rallies.....for heavens sake get the blinkers off and see what the real agenda is here.
Oh and yes....Big Kimbo said he is going to get you all your jobs back .....guess you believed that one as well.
WAKE UP!!!!!! You are political fodder.
I suppose you also believe everything that the ACTU and TWU are telling you at the "RA RA" rallies.....for heavens sake get the blinkers off and see what the real agenda is here.
Oh and yes....Big Kimbo said he is going to get you all your jobs back .....guess you believed that one as well.
WAKE UP!!!!!! You are political fodder.
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2000
Location: OZ
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dont think i deserved that abuse Nufsaid
No as a matter of fact i believe very little from the papers but u show yt ignorance by thinking the Fin Review is like normal daily papers..........
No as a matter of fact i believe very little from the papers but u show yt ignorance by thinking the Fin Review is like normal daily papers..........