Digital Still Cameras (again)
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Geriatrica, UK
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Digital Still Cameras (again)
It's been over six months since this topic was last aired and that is a long time in this fast-moving field of technology. So I hope it'll be OK to ask for opinions and advice again.
I'm after a 2 to 3 MPixel job at about £250-300 for a friend (honest!). She'll be doing image processing using PhotoShop Elements and is turning into a keen "Blue Rinse David Bailey".
Searching the Web, I've found Canon, Olympus, Sony, Fuji and Nikon models that meet the price/pixel restraints.
My own experience is of Olympus and Sony, so I know what I don't want for her. But any first hand positive recommendations from any recent new owners out there would be of great help.
So, I'd be grateful for any steers.
I'm after a 2 to 3 MPixel job at about £250-300 for a friend (honest!). She'll be doing image processing using PhotoShop Elements and is turning into a keen "Blue Rinse David Bailey".
Searching the Web, I've found Canon, Olympus, Sony, Fuji and Nikon models that meet the price/pixel restraints.
My own experience is of Olympus and Sony, so I know what I don't want for her. But any first hand positive recommendations from any recent new owners out there would be of great help.
So, I'd be grateful for any steers.
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: England
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi fobotsco
If size is an important factor so that she'll carry it around and not leave it at home most of the time (as I did with my last brick) then I have 2 recommendations. The Minolta Dimage X has 3x optical zoom (optics move inside case - very neat) and is 2MPixel. I love my music, so I ended up with the Fuji FinePix 50i which has no optical zoom (just digital) but has an MP3 player and a 2.4MPixel CCD which gives 4.3MP output. They are the same size, give or take 2mm and less than 1 inch thick in a magnesium alloy case. Both very good. You can see the print quality and more about the Fuji here, it's really excellent. It's recently been reduced from £400 to £350 and with a free 64MB smartmedia card in addition to the 32MB card it ships with, I think it's well worth it.
http://www.fujifilm.co.uk/fujidc/fp50i/index.html
ps. No, I don't work for them , just very happy with the size, quality and print results
If size is an important factor so that she'll carry it around and not leave it at home most of the time (as I did with my last brick) then I have 2 recommendations. The Minolta Dimage X has 3x optical zoom (optics move inside case - very neat) and is 2MPixel. I love my music, so I ended up with the Fuji FinePix 50i which has no optical zoom (just digital) but has an MP3 player and a 2.4MPixel CCD which gives 4.3MP output. They are the same size, give or take 2mm and less than 1 inch thick in a magnesium alloy case. Both very good. You can see the print quality and more about the Fuji here, it's really excellent. It's recently been reduced from £400 to £350 and with a free 64MB smartmedia card in addition to the 32MB card it ships with, I think it's well worth it.
http://www.fujifilm.co.uk/fujidc/fp50i/index.html
ps. No, I don't work for them , just very happy with the size, quality and print results
Have a look in www.dpreview.net
Best Digital Photography site I have found, especially the reviews and forums.
An additional thought. If your friend is keen enough to be spending the time to learn and use PS Elements, she will very quickly become aware of the limitations of the simpler cameras. EG digital zoom, it really does not compare with good optics and most reviewers disregard it as worthwhile. Perhaps you could find good value in some of the models that have been superceded by the latest whizbang put out for marketing reasons in the megapixel horsepower races.
Again try the reviews in DPReview, they go back a fair bit. Good luck.
Best Digital Photography site I have found, especially the reviews and forums.
An additional thought. If your friend is keen enough to be spending the time to learn and use PS Elements, she will very quickly become aware of the limitations of the simpler cameras. EG digital zoom, it really does not compare with good optics and most reviewers disregard it as worthwhile. Perhaps you could find good value in some of the models that have been superceded by the latest whizbang put out for marketing reasons in the megapixel horsepower races.
Again try the reviews in DPReview, they go back a fair bit. Good luck.
I have a Fuji Finepix 40i and its brilliant. Small and very good quality pictures but without optical zoom. Not a current camera but if you can find one the price will be good. See my review here:
http://www.dooyoo.co.uk/review/386163.html
There's a review there of the 50i too.
The Fuji super CCD gives 4m effective pixels - thats 2400x1800 pixel pictures. If you shoot at that res, and normal compression you'll get about 80 shots on a 64mb card and they will print at A4 size and look like real photos. (Saving at fine compression halves the number of shots per card and makes no apparent difference to the printed quality on an Epson 1440 dpi printer). Smartmedia cards are cheap at the moment - less than £25 for 64mb and about £40 for 128mb
The Fuji 50i looks like the current version (only available from Dixons/Currys/PC World group) but the Fuji 401 looks like the logical successor, same resolution but with optical zoom.
Heres a good price comparison site.
http://www.shop4digitalcameras.co.uk...?referer=gs4dc
Size is everything.
http://www.dooyoo.co.uk/review/386163.html
There's a review there of the 50i too.
The Fuji super CCD gives 4m effective pixels - thats 2400x1800 pixel pictures. If you shoot at that res, and normal compression you'll get about 80 shots on a 64mb card and they will print at A4 size and look like real photos. (Saving at fine compression halves the number of shots per card and makes no apparent difference to the printed quality on an Epson 1440 dpi printer). Smartmedia cards are cheap at the moment - less than £25 for 64mb and about £40 for 128mb
The Fuji 50i looks like the current version (only available from Dixons/Currys/PC World group) but the Fuji 401 looks like the logical successor, same resolution but with optical zoom.
Heres a good price comparison site.
http://www.shop4digitalcameras.co.uk...?referer=gs4dc
Size is everything.
Last edited by Background Noise; 12th Sep 2002 at 20:27.
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Not too far from Shoreham UK
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Surely the Fuji!!!
Have to agree with above - I've had the Fuji FinePix 50i for about 4 months.
Although it cost 450 notes at the time in Dixons they did bung me a 64MB SmartMedia free!
I can heartily recommend it (definitely the sexiest camera out there) and the pictures are great. It's got a little cradle that you sit it in for uploading and charging.
Also great talking point when you take it out and about..... "oooh that's a nice camera"!
Optical zoom - not really bothered about it! The digital zoom does it for me.
Good luck with your purchase!
GE
Have to agree with above - I've had the Fuji FinePix 50i for about 4 months.
Although it cost 450 notes at the time in Dixons they did bung me a 64MB SmartMedia free!
I can heartily recommend it (definitely the sexiest camera out there) and the pictures are great. It's got a little cradle that you sit it in for uploading and charging.
Also great talking point when you take it out and about..... "oooh that's a nice camera"!
Optical zoom - not really bothered about it! The digital zoom does it for me.
Good luck with your purchase!
GE
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Geriatrica, UK
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Again, thanks. I had also spotted the Fuji FinePix 2600 at £229 on the Web. But we are (she is) not in a hurry and we can still do more research. I'll try to push her into your price range since the usefulness of the kit gets better.
Incidentally, I do favour optical zoom as you get better definition by using all the pixels for a smaller image. Digital zoom does much the same as software zoom on the computer. However digital zoom is good if you're printing straight off the camera.
Incidentally, I do favour optical zoom as you get better definition by using all the pixels for a smaller image. Digital zoom does much the same as software zoom on the computer. However digital zoom is good if you're printing straight off the camera.
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: by the river
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Canon Ixus Digital
It was a toss up between the Fuji and the Canon but I got a better deal on the Canon at the time - bit over a year ago. Now I don't know.
I'm very happy with it, in low density 480 x 600 - it produces just great snaps - and up the top end of the range great pic's. Its always in the pocket, on my belt or in the bag.
The newer models have more zoom and are a tad bigger.
Size is everything - smaller is better. The canon is chunky and thus very easy to fit in the palm. Case that came with is great bbbbbuuuutttt the silver surface on the plasti-leather departs. Once gone its even better. Software supplied very acceptable - but the pro stuff is better.
Price then about £320 - now don't know. I got mine in HK.
I'm very happy with it, in low density 480 x 600 - it produces just great snaps - and up the top end of the range great pic's. Its always in the pocket, on my belt or in the bag.
The newer models have more zoom and are a tad bigger.
Size is everything - smaller is better. The canon is chunky and thus very easy to fit in the palm. Case that came with is great bbbbbuuuutttt the silver surface on the plasti-leather departs. Once gone its even better. Software supplied very acceptable - but the pro stuff is better.
Price then about £320 - now don't know. I got mine in HK.
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Somewhere probing
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here is a TOP site for camera reviews - trust me !!!
For truly ace digital camera info check out this site: http://www.dpreview.com ( and in particular the 'Reviews' section - see menu item on the left hand side ) It is BRILLIANT !!!
Indeed on the strength of it I purchased a Canon PowerShot G2 - and I could not be happier with it, e.g. it's better than my Canon EOS SLR (which is saying something).
P.s. Also have a look at the 'Reviews' section (link at top of page) available on http://reviews.zdnet.co.uk which includes some handy links to various favourably-priced on-line suppliers ( i.e. click on their 'check-prices' link(s) ).
Indeed on the strength of it I purchased a Canon PowerShot G2 - and I could not be happier with it, e.g. it's better than my Canon EOS SLR (which is saying something).
P.s. Also have a look at the 'Reviews' section (link at top of page) available on http://reviews.zdnet.co.uk which includes some handy links to various favourably-priced on-line suppliers ( i.e. click on their 'check-prices' link(s) ).
Last edited by Devils Advocate; 23rd Aug 2002 at 20:13.
Hello Gofer: "Size is everything - smaller is better"
I agree that the portability of some of the smaller models is a big convenience, (I still have my Rollei 35 and Contax TVS), but one of the prices of "small" that should be considered is rather limited battery capacity. This can be an annoying limitation and the built in flash capability also becomes more limited by the battery power available.
Like so many of the features on these digital cameras it is one of the considerations that depend on what you want from the camera.
I must say though, that it is amazing the capability and features they have managed to squeez into some of the smaller cameras.
I agree that the portability of some of the smaller models is a big convenience, (I still have my Rollei 35 and Contax TVS), but one of the prices of "small" that should be considered is rather limited battery capacity. This can be an annoying limitation and the built in flash capability also becomes more limited by the battery power available.
Like so many of the features on these digital cameras it is one of the considerations that depend on what you want from the camera.
I must say though, that it is amazing the capability and features they have managed to squeez into some of the smaller cameras.
I bought an Olympus 3020 (3.2 mill pix) last month and took it on holiday to South Africa . Very pleased with the results. The ability to edit out pics in the hotel at the end of the day is brilliant. My 27 year old Olympus OM1 is still going strong so I stayed with the name. Get yourself a 64 and 128 mb card and two sets of rechargable batteries and a charger also . Worth the outlay.
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: BC
Posts: 450
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've got two cams, a Sony 2.1 and a new Fuji 30i.
The auto color correcting and the sharpness of the Fuji is superbe. I was originally after a 4.0 mega Olympus..but I got 'taken' in HKG! lol...but to tell you the truth, the convenience of my Fuji along with (slides nicely in the flight bag corner) the imaging, I have no complaints.
My only comment on the 30i is that it is a battery consumer. I don't often take my recharger with me, so I need a good supply of AAs.
Happy picture taking!
The auto color correcting and the sharpness of the Fuji is superbe. I was originally after a 4.0 mega Olympus..but I got 'taken' in HKG! lol...but to tell you the truth, the convenience of my Fuji along with (slides nicely in the flight bag corner) the imaging, I have no complaints.
My only comment on the 30i is that it is a battery consumer. I don't often take my recharger with me, so I need a good supply of AAs.
Happy picture taking!
Guest
Posts: n/a
just a couple of additional points...
all!!!! digital cameras produce a picture with some deviations from reallity. There is a program which adjusts the ready pictures on the PC with brightness, color setting etc...have a look for Xe847-Photo
Further, enlarging the picture size results in grains and pixellation, there is a nice program available which uses a couple of available interpolation routines and combines them to produce stunning big formats. I created a 2 x 3 mtr wallpaper with it and no one can spot the difference to any negative or slide reproduction...have a look for S-spline
all!!!! digital cameras produce a picture with some deviations from reallity. There is a program which adjusts the ready pictures on the PC with brightness, color setting etc...have a look for Xe847-Photo
Further, enlarging the picture size results in grains and pixellation, there is a nice program available which uses a couple of available interpolation routines and combines them to produce stunning big formats. I created a 2 x 3 mtr wallpaper with it and no one can spot the difference to any negative or slide reproduction...have a look for S-spline
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Geriatrica, UK
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Most grateful for all these inputs. Still waiting for Which? report in few days and then I'll make my report to my friend. But we will all find these posts useful, I'm sure.
Nightrider, you must have been one of the earliest registrants on PPRuNe!
Nightrider, you must have been one of the earliest registrants on PPRuNe!
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Under the duvet
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Slightly OT, but wondered if anyone can help me. I've got a Fuji 4700, v. nice but I've lost the CD Rom with the USB Mass Storage drivers, want to install on a new PC and you can't download the driver from the Fujifilm site.
Anybody have any ideas?
Anybody have any ideas?
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: by the river
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
DA & Innuendo
Devil's Ad
Absolutely tops - that link I mean. I do believe you.
Got any other Gem's in you Weblife that you you feel are recommendable ? E-Mail me if you prefer that to posting !
Innuendo
As per DA's link and the camera's review - the battery is limited (but also small). In the soft carry case for your belt that came with the camera - I find I have space for the original storage card (8Mb. is just a waste of time - 32Mb. I can live with because most of my pics are 640x480. I you want High Res - 64 or 128 are probably a must) and for a spare battery - 2 are usually enough for a day - proviso, switch the display off and don't review until you are back at base, at least of photogenic days.
Its NOT a pro cam, but for a amateur its fab.... suffers a little from steaming up in the tropics when going from the a/c at 17°C to 30+ and 99% Humidity - but so do all the others....
am still a happy bunny, it was a 'good buy'.
Absolutely tops - that link I mean. I do believe you.
Got any other Gem's in you Weblife that you you feel are recommendable ? E-Mail me if you prefer that to posting !
Innuendo
As per DA's link and the camera's review - the battery is limited (but also small). In the soft carry case for your belt that came with the camera - I find I have space for the original storage card (8Mb. is just a waste of time - 32Mb. I can live with because most of my pics are 640x480. I you want High Res - 64 or 128 are probably a must) and for a spare battery - 2 are usually enough for a day - proviso, switch the display off and don't review until you are back at base, at least of photogenic days.
Its NOT a pro cam, but for a amateur its fab.... suffers a little from steaming up in the tropics when going from the a/c at 17°C to 30+ and 99% Humidity - but so do all the others....
am still a happy bunny, it was a 'good buy'.