Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Computer/Internet Issues & Troubleshooting
Reload this Page >

Housekeeping an ageing Compaq Presario

Wikiposts
Search
Computer/Internet Issues & Troubleshooting Anyone with questions about the terribly complex world of computers or the internet should try here. NOT FOR REPORTING ISSUES WITH PPRuNe FORUMS! Please use the subforum "PPRuNe Problems or Queries."

Housekeeping an ageing Compaq Presario

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Dec 2014, 14:57
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: YMML
Posts: 1,838
Received 16 Likes on 6 Posts
MS reckons less than 10% fragmented isn't worth bothering with so that's probably a reasonable benchmark to use. Either use Defraggler to analyse the drive or at an elevated privilege command prompt:

defrag.exe c: -a

I'd almost forgotten about defragmenting drives - I just let Windows get on with it on Mme Pingoiun's laptops. Might get checked a few times a year if the laptop is on in the wee small hours. But then the drives are only half full. Entirely forgotten about on Linux, even with a very full drive. Used to play with it all the time with Win98 on FAT32

Curiously defrag.exe reported a Vista drive as 5% fragmented while Defraggler reports 18%. Something to do with what Defraggler calls "low occupancy" perhaps?

Last edited by le Pingouin; 12th Dec 2014 at 15:27.
le Pingouin is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2014, 15:57
  #22 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Mallorca
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So far as the defragging goes, I'm absolutely convinced that it's effective in the case of this installation. Well before midweek, each week, the laptop is going so slowly that it would drive me nuts. From button press to an open Chrome (she insists upon Chrome ) takes more than five minutes but around one minute and 30 seconds after the cleanup. CrapCleaner for several years took between 5 and 15 GB of rubbish out of the HDD every week but over the past year it has gradually crept down to around 100 to 200 MB a week even though Madam's pattern of work remains similar so I think it's likely that, proportionally, CrapCleaner bears a lesser responsibility for the weekly improvement recently. This summer I was away for about 12 days and missed two consecutive weekly cleans and the machine essentially stopped. Apparently it had posted repeated warnings that the HDD had so little free space that the next desired application might just not work. When I got back the defrag took almost 24 hours and I had to run it twice consecutively to get the free space back from under 4 GB (unreliable but is as I seem to remember it) to 36 GB. Unfortunately, with all of my own catching up to do I didn't take a note of the number of files and fragments at the start of the process. Two years ago the start position was typically 20 GB free space out of 111 GB, 15,000 fragmented files with 80,000 fragments. For some reason now it usually starts with around the same amount of free space but the fragmented file count is usually around 2,000 and the number of fragments at about 7,000. I don't know what the reason is for the reduction because the time taken to do the clean up and the free space recovered each time remains about the same, so does the change in performance. Defraggler usually stops with fewer than four fragmented files and under ten fragments remaining and quite often achieves zero of each. The free space is only recovered towards the very end of the process so stopping it early (and I'm often tempted!) doesn't achieve that. Using the "Quick Defrag" fails to recover the free space at all and so it often stops with less than 10 GB free.

I'd love to be able to avoid it all but the machine essentially died when it was left undone for only the two Wednesdays in a row so I don't see that I have any choice. I emphasise again that the computer is very revived each week by doing it. It never reaches a gallop but does a fair imitation of a trot!

Respectfully, I don't think I have any option other than to find a defragmenter and a backup program equally efficient and simple to use but hopefully quicker.

Last edited by Cameronian; 12th Dec 2014 at 17:01.
Cameronian is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2014, 18:27
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Finland
Age: 77
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What you describe is abnormal/unusual behaviour.

I would seriously consider replacing the hard drive - it shouldn't need defragging once a week.
finncapt is offline  
Old 16th Dec 2014, 05:11
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Denver,Co USA
Age: 76
Posts: 333
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have a Compaq C700 that has about the same specs as your computer. I got it,in 2008 and it had Vista on it. I put in a new hard drive and Win 8 a year ago and got the case cleaned out. Works fine. I never do any maintenance on it at all.
Rick777 is offline  
Old 16th Dec 2014, 10:37
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: lancs.UK
Age: 77
Posts: 1,191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My desktop was built from bits ~10 years ago. The video card popped a capacitor (later repaired) and was replaced with a better one. I upgraded the memory with used ebay purchases....max is supposed to be 3 Gb but it "sees" the 4 installed It's partitioned with XP( sole purpose to drive a R/C helicopter flight sim) and the default is Linux.

This ubuntu has not been updated for at least 6 years!....When my kids visit,i complain that U-tube and flash player no longer work. nor does the DVD burner.

They shrug their shoulders and tell me to bin "that old junk"
I plug in a camera....itis recognised and pics are downloaded......I plug in a printer....Laser, dot-matrix, Inkjet are all automatically recognised. It prints letters and pictures. it works and is prompt...anything over 5 seconds ,is a "cancel and try again" issue. .....In extremis, I turn it off at night and reboot it the
following morning....otherwise it's on 24/7/365.

get rid of your windoze..Ubuntu is free they'll even send you a disc if you can't be bothered to download and DIY..
I have never gone through ANY of that rigmarole you do weekly
You must really, really love your wife to put up with that..
cockney steve is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2014, 08:23
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Timbuktu
Posts: 962
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This ubuntu has not been updated for at least 6 years!
Never upgrade. Recent releases have the default shell (Gnome 2) replaced by something called "unity" which is a completely different (and IMHO vastly inferior) user experience
Booglebox is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2014, 09:10
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: YMML
Posts: 1,838
Received 16 Likes on 6 Posts
C'mon guys! Running an expired OS is dumb, no matter which brand it is. You do know you can install desktops other than the default? Or just use one of the *buntus with the desktop you like. Ubuntu 14.04LTS is supported until April 2019 so will likely outlive the hardware.

Have a look at MATE (forked from GNOME 2) or something like LXDE - they provide a "traditional" style GUI & are relatively light on RAM.
le Pingouin is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2014, 09:57
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Timbuktu
Posts: 962
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ubuntu 14.04LTS
Good point, worth upgrading to.
Booglebox is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2014, 21:22
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: 50'11N 004' 16W
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is the computer running, or ever run a Norton anti-virus product?

Download adw cleaner to get rid of adware.

I use Ccleaner, malwarebytes and advance system care. All are free. My anti-virus is AVG free.

I have a spare PC and a spare laptop that I use for "buggering about" with. I've tried allsorts and slowly learned from some mistakes. Ubuntu is the way ahead if you want a quick operating system on an old spec computer. The learning curve could outweigh the benefits though -depending on beardyness levels.
ex_matelot is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.