Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Computer/Internet Issues & Troubleshooting
Reload this Page >

Support for XP (Pro) and IE 8 users here on PPRuNe...

Wikiposts
Search
Computer/Internet Issues & Troubleshooting Anyone with questions about the terribly complex world of computers or the internet should try here. NOT FOR REPORTING ISSUES WITH PPRuNe FORUMS! Please use the subforum "PPRuNe Problems or Queries."

Support for XP (Pro) and IE 8 users here on PPRuNe...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Feb 2014, 16:17
  #81 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 3,663
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You've got to be joking. With an "estimated 20 to 25 percent of PC users still using XP" who won't be getting security updates, you're the low hanging fruit of security issues. You'll be perpetually vulnerable to any security flaw that comes along after April. If you don't think the black hats don't have a few saved up especially I've got a bridge to sell at a special price just for you.
Agree 100%.

I reckon that's exactly what the dark side are doing. Holding back on releasing exploits now, because they know after D-Day they can charge premium prices because they will effectively be selling guaranteed perpetual zero-day exploits.
mixture is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2014, 18:36
  #82 (permalink)  

Plastic PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Cape Town
Posts: 1,898
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Microsoft are in a bit of a cleft stick (partly of their own making).

XP was a good OS for it's time but by default very light on security - it just isn't safe in todays world even if locked down.

The problem for Microsoft is that 500 million people are still running it for a multiplicity of reasons - they have old machines that won't run a more modern OS that they can't afford to upgrade (I'm looking at you Granny!), they can't afford and/or know how to upgrade and they may be running old applications that depend on XP's quirks.

MS, quite rightly, see no reason to keep on supporting an aged OS that stops people buying their latest offerings. And there are significant limits to securing XP on ageing hardware.

But the problem is that by stopping security patches they expose a very large number of users to exploits, which may well result in a huge number of pwned/botnet machines that could bring the internet to it's knees... You have to look at the larger picture.

MS is kind of damned if they do and damned if they don't!

A difficult problem!

Mac

[Add of course the seemingly unstoppable Mac onslaught, the slow evolution of Linux into more user friendly incarnations like Mint and Chrome OS, the remarkable rise of Android and Microsoft have a lot to worry about]

Mac the Knife is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2014, 20:58
  #83 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Down under
Age: 79
Posts: 570
Received 15 Likes on 8 Posts
Thank you Mac - an excellent and realistic assessment of how it is, and how it might be.

I've installed dual boot options for Linux for online work on three of my XP machines which need XP for essential if occasional work in applications where there are no post XP or Linux alternatives.

I've got to admit that Ubuntu has come a long way since I last installed it, and Linux Mint is very attractive (thanks to those who suggested it). However both installations required me to switch to geek mode to complete the process. This is potentially a barrier to the computer illiterate masses who might be advised to go the Linux way.

Interesting times.
FullOppositeRudder is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2014, 16:48
  #84 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: scotland
Posts: 195
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Given the enthusiasm for new technology on this board I had to laugh at this (in the Independent):


Ex-BBC boss Mark Thompson apologises to MPs and public over wasting £100m on digital archive.....

The MPs heard from Dominic Coles, the BBC’s Director of Operations ................... He said that the £125m digital archive, which was intended to serve the entire organisation, was so “clunky” that it was ten times slower than the 40-year-old system it was designed to replace
occasional is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2014, 16:01
  #85 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: U.K.
Posts: 805
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the information F.O.R and others. I have now burned my Ubuntu ad Ubuntu mint DVDs, My new hard drive has arrived so I shall shortly be cloning my original hard drive onto this, putting it in my machine and installing some version of Linux. I just hope that the Geekiness needed to get it running is not too severe.

P.P.
P.Pilcher is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2014, 21:29
  #86 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Down under
Age: 79
Posts: 570
Received 15 Likes on 8 Posts
Take heart - my experiences mentioned above did not involve serious surgery, and from previous forays into the Linux world I was able to emerge triumphant.

The challenges were getting the disk partition mix correct in the Mint installation, and installing the wireless driver for the new Ubuntu in my Lenovo S10. A few lines of command line work was required for this bit - based on some internet research where someone else had been there before and was kind enough to share.

I'm sure your installation will work out well.

FOR
FullOppositeRudder is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.