Database page disjoint
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bracknell, Berks, UK
Age: 52
Posts: 1,133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Incidentally, that was posted at 16:13pm not 07:38am as the page reports. Very similar time issue occurred on the tethering thread too. Definitely a time clock awry somewhere.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bracknell, Berks, UK
Age: 52
Posts: 1,133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Database Page Disjoint 2
This is just a post for CleeIB and the rest of the people monitoring the other database disjoint thread to note that it's a time related issue (read my other posts in that thread for info), and so i'm posting this here so it doesn't get lost with all the shuffling associated with that.
Incidentally, the time (sponsored by Mike-Bracknell) is currently 16:17pm on the 18th of Jan 2013 (which is unlikely to be the same as the timestamp if this issue remains!)
Incidentally, the time (sponsored by Mike-Bracknell) is currently 16:17pm on the 18th of Jan 2013 (which is unlikely to be the same as the timestamp if this issue remains!)
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Saab - if you look back at this thread this is a 'common occurrence' - some can, some cannot. I suspect it is the 'long thread'/mods slashing/weekly database align again. I've done all the usual , cookies cleared, log in anon, no change. I still jump from Mixture at 1839-17/1 to pattern is full 0603-18/1.
Now seeing the same on R&N IranAir thread. Main page shows 'Hetfield 1002' but clicking on the last post link only shows opening posts - and Hetfield is not there. Both IE and FF, anon and logged in. This is exactly what happened last time round and I think it took a DB rebuild to sort it..
Now seeing the same on R&N IranAir thread. Main page shows 'Hetfield 1002' but clicking on the last post link only shows opening posts - and Hetfield is not there. Both IE and FF, anon and logged in. This is exactly what happened last time round and I think it took a DB rebuild to sort it..
Last edited by BOAC; 18th Jan 2013 at 09:15.
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes - that is exactly what we had last time round (I think it was the Vulcan thread), and I recall CleeIB could not reproduce it either.
If anyone from IB is listening............... after clicking on http://www.pprune.org/rumours-news/4...y-arlanda.html (where I cannot access the latest posts) still shows the thread as 'unvisited'
If anyone from IB is listening............... after clicking on http://www.pprune.org/rumours-news/4...y-arlanda.html (where I cannot access the latest posts) still shows the thread as 'unvisited'
http://http://www.pprune.org/dg-p-ge...nunda-511.html
There are varying and random problems with the last few pages of this thread. It presently lists pages up to 516. However the current last page is 514. When on that page, clicking 513 delivers me to page 511. etc ....
Using FF 18.01 here but has been evident with all earlier versions.
Respectfully, and with sincere appreciation for the behind the curtain work .....
FOR
There are varying and random problems with the last few pages of this thread. It presently lists pages up to 516. However the current last page is 514. When on that page, clicking 513 delivers me to page 511. etc ....
Using FF 18.01 here but has been evident with all earlier versions.
Respectfully, and with sincere appreciation for the behind the curtain work .....
FOR
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: El Segundo
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FullOppositeRudder, that's actually a separate issue. We have a script in place that runs twice a week to update the post counts. Sometimes it takes a few rounds to work its magic, but it usually does. If that issue is still occurring in a week, please drop me a line.
As that thread is gigantic (500+ pages), it is more prone to malfunction due to strain on the database. I'll recommend to the mods that they start a Mk II version of the thread (connecting back to the old one).
As that thread is gigantic (500+ pages), it is more prone to malfunction due to strain on the database. I'll recommend to the mods that they start a Mk II version of the thread (connecting back to the old one).
Apologies My understanding about these things is very limited indeed - even more than I realised. Thank you for your patience.
Last edited by FullOppositeRudder; 22nd Jan 2013 at 20:28.