Win XP/SATA Drive/C:Drive
Thread Starter
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 18,575
Likes: 4
From: UK
FOR -as you can see I have 'restored' the letter 'C' to the correct drive. As you say, the machine WILL operate correctly without but there are still some less-than-perfect install routine that 'automatically' install to the 'C ' drive and you may find difficulties with these. I can remember installing some assembler-type stuff a while back that just stuffed things onto the 'C' drive (without any choice) and in those days the 'C' drive was the 'C' drive
. In your case, I guess best left alone, but the facility to change is there if you need it. The only drive letter you cannot 're-assign' in XP normally is the system/boot drive.
. In your case, I guess best left alone, but the facility to change is there if you need it. The only drive letter you cannot 're-assign' in XP normally is the system/boot drive.
Plastic PPRuNer

Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,902
Likes: 0
From: Rochechouart, France
You need to understand the syntax of ARC paths
BOOT.INI and ARC Path Naming Conventions and Usage
and Windows XP ARC Naming Conventions - TRCB
Mac
BOOT.INI and ARC Path Naming Conventions and Usage
and Windows XP ARC Naming Conventions - TRCB
Mac

Joined: May 2009
Posts: 611
Likes: 62
From: Down under
BOAC, thank you for that. This machine doesn't get a lot of 'new' requests these days - 'tis largely used in a routine and somewhat unadventurous role. I'll watch out for the points you have raised however, few things are more unpleasant than the prospect of re-installing the OS and programs. I have always stored data and My Docs on the second physical drive so - in theory anyway - they should be safe.
Thanks again, this 'forum' is exceptional in the breadth of experience available and the accuracy of advice offered.
FOR
Thanks again, this 'forum' is exceptional in the breadth of experience available and the accuracy of advice offered.
FOR
Thread Starter
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 18,575
Likes: 4
From: UK
Not sure if that was for me or FOR, but
- convince me
No RISC, No SCSI and no problems directing the system to the OS? First para on x-86 already fully 'understood'.
You need to understand the syntax of ARC paths

No RISC, No SCSI and no problems directing the system to the OS? First para on x-86 already fully 'understood'.
Plastic PPRuNer

Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,902
Likes: 0
From: Rochechouart, France
"Theoretically, this syntax could be used to start Windows NT on any drive in the system. However, this would require that all drives are correctly identified through the standard INT 13 interface; since support for this varies from disk controller to disk controller and most system BIOS only identify a single disk controller through INT 13, in practice it is only safe to use this syntax to start Windows NT from the first two drives connected to the primary disk controller, or the first four drives in the case of a dual-channel EIDE controller."
To avoid tears put Windows
boot drive on the first SATA socket (SATA 0)

Mac
To avoid tears put Windows
boot drive on the first SATA socket (SATA 0)Mac




