e-mail scam initiative.
Thread Starter
Administrator
Joined: Mar 2001
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 8,121
Likes: 686
From: Twickenham, home of rugby
e-mail scam initiative.
A positive initiative, if you haven't already seen it:
Report e-mail scams, National Fraud Authority urges
Apologies for the UK bias!
SD
Report e-mail scams, National Fraud Authority urges
Apologies for the UK bias!
SD
Official PPRuNe Chaplain
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,498
Likes: 0
From: Witnesham, Suffolk
It looks like a good initiative, so I sent it a report with a con scam that had got though Spamcop. It bounced back as undeliverable with a subsequent address not being valid ([email protected]).
Pity.
Pity.
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
From: The Land of Beer and Chocolate
It looks like a good initiative, so I sent it a report with a con scam that had got though Spamcop. It bounced back as undeliverable with a subsequent address not being valid ([email protected]).
And did you use the following email address to forward scam emails, clearly says that address is to be used.
[email protected]
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 18,575
Likes: 4
From: UK
HB - it looks as if the government/Quangos have managed another 80% success with this site/initiative. Without knowing what Keef did, I suspect he followed the 'front page' which tells you
"You can now forward on scam emails you receive to Action Fraud at [email protected]." - an apparently simple procedure?
Now after another 4 mouse clicks we find it will take you "20-30 minutes to fill in the on-line form" to submit an email.
It is not really very clear what they want. Option 1) is the one that will produce results. I predict only the die-hards will follow option 2)
"You can now forward on scam emails you receive to Action Fraud at [email protected]." - an apparently simple procedure?
Now after another 4 mouse clicks we find it will take you "20-30 minutes to fill in the on-line form" to submit an email.
It is not really very clear what they want. Option 1) is the one that will produce results. I predict only the die-hards will follow option 2)





