Notices
Computer/Internet Issues & Troubleshooting Anyone with questions about the terribly complex world of computers or the internet should try here. NOT FOR REPORTING ISSUES WITH PPRuNe FORUMS! Please use the subforum "PPRuNe Problems or Queries."

AVG / HP Trojan

Old 20th January 2011 | 14:01
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
Guest
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere between E17487 and F75775
AVG / HP Trojan

OS: XP w/ SP 3.

For the last two weeks AVG has reported a trojan in the HP printer software package as part of the daily scan.

Every day its removed and subsequently it is back again.

Googling the trojan number shows a lot of folk started getting this warning recently, always affecting people with HP Photosmart printers, so I suspect its a bug in a recent AVG update.

However: I ran malwarebytes this afternoon, which found six trojans, none of them the one that AVG was reporting, and eliminated them.

No help needed: just reporting it for other PPRuNe members.
OFSO is offline  
Reply
Old 20th January 2011 | 16:15
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,663
Likes: 0
From: Earth
If it's electronic and it's got some form of logic (firmware/software or otherwise) then it is vulnerable to attack.

It used to be quite trendy for virus writers to target printers. Perhaps this trend is coming back to the scene.
mixture is offline  
Reply
Old 20th January 2011 | 16:38
  #3 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,133
Likes: 0
From: Bracknell, Berks, UK
Did you try running Malwarebytes in Safe Mode with Command Prompt? (you need to be able to invoke mbam.exe using DOS commands) as this is the safest way of starting Malwarebytes which won't start any other viruses as well (so far).
Mike-Bracknell is offline  
Reply
Old 20th January 2011 | 16:53
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 894
Likes: 1
From: uk
Many folk regard HP software as little better than a virus.

The printers are usually good but the supplied software is best left in the box.
vulcanised is offline  
Reply
Old 20th January 2011 | 17:17
  #5 (permalink)  

Controversial, moi?
50 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,622
Likes: 22
From: UK
However: I ran malwarebytes this afternoon, which found six trojans, none of them the one that AVG was reporting, and eliminated them
In my experience there does not seem to be a single AV program which will catch every piece of malicious or irritating unwanted software. AVG Free used to be very good but like most AV programs I have found it became clunky and intrusive with successive updates.

I now use Avast! Free which I believe is as good as any, does not slow the machine and is, of course, free.
M.Mouse is offline  
Reply
Old 20th January 2011 | 19:23
  #6 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 18,575
Likes: 4
From: UK
I'll second M M's vote for Avast. Better than Mike B's idea (which is fine) is to run Avast in boot scan mode - that way you virus check before ANY windows functions are loaded which reduces the risks of anything 'cloaking' itself even in Safe mode. I believe Avira, another free AV product, has suite of tools including downloadable CD's.
BOAC is offline  
Reply
Old 20th January 2011 | 19:38
  #7 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,694
Likes: 15
From: Wellington,NZ
Different security applications usually (or often) have different naming protocols for malware found.

One of the important things in researching scan results is the original file name and full path of the detection/s.

Each file can be uploaded to VirusTotal - Free Online Virus, Malware and URL Scanner for multiple second (about 41) opinions. In the case of a well known malicious file, or a well known false detection, the chances are high that the file has already been analysed.

If it's a false positive, the file should be submitted to AVG for further analysis. (I have no idea how diligent Grisoft are in dealing with these. I know that Avast deals with them very promptly.)

MBAM, like all the others, sometimes produces a false detection. For it to have detected 6 malware files is highly suspicious. I would take these detections seriously. MBAM is best run in normal mode.

As an aside, I've had to format and re-install Windows once since I've had it in 5 years. The reason? I foolishly re-installed my HP printer software ('coz it was borked) and that over-wrote some more recent Windows updates, borking the .net framework and Windows update status.
Tarq57 is offline  
Reply
Old 20th January 2011 | 22:00
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,609
Likes: 0
From: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Avast in boot scan mode

Avast in boot scan mode-how would you set that up?
glad rag is offline  
Reply
Old 20th January 2011 | 23:28
  #9 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,694
Likes: 15
From: Wellington,NZ
Avast in boot scan mode-how would you set that up?
Right click the tray icon>Open avast user interface>Scan computer>Boot time scan and then schedule it. Set it to examine whatever you want it to. Restart the computer. It could take an hour or more.

I would do this only if there is malware detected by Avast, that investigation indicates is the real deal (rather than a FP), and normal removal doesn't work.

There is little point in doing it if Avast doesn't detect it. If it is run, and it turns out it is a false positive, too late. The file will have been quarantined. Worst case scenario, it's an important system file. This is a worst case scenario, possible but not very likely.
Tarq57 is offline  
Reply
Old 21st January 2011 | 12:37
  #10 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
Guest
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere between E17487 and F75775
The end of my story (maybe) - ran malwarebytes and removed threats yesterday, ran malwarebytes again this morning, no threats found, ran AVG at lunchtime, no threats found.

I know I know, just because you can't see them.......however I'm going to take malwarebytes and AVG's results on faith.
OFSO is offline  
Reply
Old 21st January 2011 | 12:58
  #11 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 18,575
Likes: 4
From: UK
There are some good on-line scanners if you ever want a 'third opinion'
BOAC is offline  
Reply
Old 21st January 2011 | 14:12
  #12 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
Guest
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere between E17487 and F75775
malwarebytes seems to come out at/near the top in every test I have seen.

TD: I had a look at my BIL's laptop at Christmas - he "can't be bothered with antivirus" but "suddenly it's not working". (I know, multiple rolling of eyes and headshakes).

MWB (run in safe mode) found 133 different threats, trojans, etc. Probably not a record, but it surprised me.

I cleaned his laptop up and put a free antivirus on it, but since he "can't be bothered with such things" it will probably fail again very soon.

PEBSAK !
OFSO is offline  
Reply
Old 21st January 2011 | 15:33
  #13 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,133
Likes: 0
From: Bracknell, Berks, UK
Originally Posted by OFSO
MWB (run in safe mode) found 133 different threats, trojans, etc. Probably not a record, but it surprised me.
979 is my record for a customer PC, who refused to change her kids' usage habits as they were P2Ping tons of music, films and games (and the associated viruses). Surprising really, since she was a lawyer.
Mike-Bracknell is offline  
Reply
Old 21st January 2011 | 15:41
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,663
Likes: 0
From: Earth
979 is my record for a customer PC
Please tell me you did the right thing and reformatted the infested thing rather than sitting there racking up billable hours.
mixture is offline  
Reply
Old 21st January 2011 | 15:51
  #15 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,133
Likes: 0
From: Bracknell, Berks, UK
Originally Posted by mixture
Please tell me you did the right thing and reformatted the infested thing rather than sitting there racking up billable hours.
Unfortunately, for those with more money than sense she didn't care about my billable hours and just wanted her PC working without losing anything on it.

Unfortunately for me too, I was on a fixed contract.

Luckily though, those 979 infections were only from 17 viruses
Mike-Bracknell is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd January 2011 | 08:19
  #16 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
Guest
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere between E17487 and F75775
The first inkling of a trojan in my PC was when AVG reported one in a HP (printer) file.

Just ocurred to me - the HP software installs to default keeping a com port open to report problems, pick up software updates etc. Could this be why the trojan installed to the HP printer files ?

I've just gone to the HP settings and turned everything off everything associated with automatic up and down linking of info., just wondering whether this will be enough.
OFSO is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd January 2011 | 08:27
  #17 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,694
Likes: 15
From: Wellington,NZ
Without knowing what the file was, and what the AV company subsequently analysed it to actually be (real or false) it's impossible to say with certainty. However, the indications deducible from the info provided so far is that the file AVG detected as a trojan probably was not a trojan, and the files that MBAM detected (which bore no relationship to the AVG detection) probably were malicious.

So, if you see my logic, here, the above surmise is invalid.
It is unlikely that malicious files would install themselves via a printer update, and a firewall would (should) prevent anything but printer software from connecting in the fashion you mention.
Tarq57 is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd January 2011 | 09:44
  #18 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
Guest
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere between E17487 and F75775
Thanks. Yes, firewall was (and is) up and running. So what was in the printer software was or maybe was not, a real/false, but the infections MWB discovered were real - that's my thinking.

BTW, machine is clear of problems today (as for the past few days).
OFSO is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.