Anyone had problems with 2o7.net?
Official PPRuNe Chaplain
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Witnesham, Suffolk
Age: 79
Posts: 3,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Anyone had problems with 2o7.net?
Over the past few weeks, Thunderbird has hiccupped spasmodically on my machine. I didn't worry too much, until it did it several times in one day.
The error message was always the same:
Google didn't recognise the error code. Some more research indicated that 2o7.net iappears to be a proprietary security outfit in Utah, specialising in anti-fraud "solutions". So I decided to go to their website to see what's up.
At that point, WOT came up with a warning that the site has a poor/very poor reputation and advised me not to go to it. Further research showed that a whole range of 2o7.net links are proscribed in the hosts file I downloaded from a security site. Clearly some folks who I trust about Internet security have reservations about 2o7.net.
Next question: so why is Thunderbird trying to connect to 2o7.net anyway?
The answer was soon revealed, in the HTML of a PayPal e-mail confirming I'd paid someone:
So, I ask myself, why is PayPal sending me to a dodgy "security" site when it confirms I've paid? I asked PayPal via their online enquiries panel. The first answer, from their technical support, was evasive and asked me to contact customer services. I have now sent the same query to customer services (I wonder why technical services couldn't forward it).
Does anyone know more about 2o7.net and what it actually does? Is there a reason why the "advisers" put it into their recommended hosts file, and why WOT doesn't like it?
The error message was always the same:
102.112.2o7.net has sent an incorrect or unexpected message. Error code: -12263
At that point, WOT came up with a warning that the site has a poor/very poor reputation and advised me not to go to it. Further research showed that a whole range of 2o7.net links are proscribed in the hosts file I downloaded from a security site. Clearly some folks who I trust about Internet security have reservations about 2o7.net.
Next question: so why is Thunderbird trying to connect to 2o7.net anyway?
The answer was soon revealed, in the HTML of a PayPal e-mail confirming I'd paid someone:
So, I ask myself, why is PayPal sending me to a dodgy "security" site when it confirms I've paid? I asked PayPal via their online enquiries panel. The first answer, from their technical support, was evasive and asked me to contact customer services. I have now sent the same query to customer services (I wonder why technical services couldn't forward it).
Does anyone know more about 2o7.net and what it actually does? Is there a reason why the "advisers" put it into their recommended hosts file, and why WOT doesn't like it?
More bang for your buck
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: land of the clanger
Age: 80
Posts: 3,512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Their explanation: Omniture Privacy - 2o7.net Explained
other info:
Plagued by the 2o7.net cookie | Technology | guardian.co.uk
What is Omniture, and why is it watching me? | Technology | The Guardian
I suggest you untick the 'accept cookies from third parties' box, that will stop it geting into your M/C.
other info:
Plagued by the 2o7.net cookie | Technology | guardian.co.uk
What is Omniture, and why is it watching me? | Technology | The Guardian
I suggest you untick the 'accept cookies from third parties' box, that will stop it geting into your M/C.
Official PPRuNe Chaplain
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Witnesham, Suffolk
Age: 79
Posts: 3,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks! So it's a tracking cookie. I'm glad it's blocked - I don't like being tracked.
No connection is being made to 2o7.net from my PC because the hosts file blocks it - that's what's causing the error messages. There are no 2o7 cookies in my Firefox.
It's Thunderbird that's getting these - or rather, not.
I watched this afternoon when I opened a Paypal e-mail: the "doing something" spinning daisy whirled for a good 20 seconds before giving up and spitting out the error message about 2o7.
More browsing revealed that there's a toggle in the Paypal Profile settings for all e-mails to come in plain text rather than HTML. I've made that change which, I think, will remove the 2o7 link altogether from Paypal e-mails.
GG's links are scary. It hadn't dawned on me that they'd create a link like 192.168.112.2o7.net - made to look like an IP address on a network. That is sneaky! Obviously up to no good.
No connection is being made to 2o7.net from my PC because the hosts file blocks it - that's what's causing the error messages. There are no 2o7 cookies in my Firefox.
It's Thunderbird that's getting these - or rather, not.
I watched this afternoon when I opened a Paypal e-mail: the "doing something" spinning daisy whirled for a good 20 seconds before giving up and spitting out the error message about 2o7.
More browsing revealed that there's a toggle in the Paypal Profile settings for all e-mails to come in plain text rather than HTML. I've made that change which, I think, will remove the 2o7 link altogether from Paypal e-mails.
GG's links are scary. It hadn't dawned on me that they'd create a link like 192.168.112.2o7.net - made to look like an IP address on a network. That is sneaky! Obviously up to no good.
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 3,663
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
GG's links are scary. It hadn't dawned on me that they'd create a link like 192.168.112.2o7.net - made to look like an IP address on a network. That is sneaky! Obviously up to no good.
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Escapee from Ultima Thule
Posts: 4,278
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
I have a simple policy: No cookies from any site unless I specifically allow. Even then I limit cookies only to those that enable a service I require. I don't allow any cookies or scripts from any ad or tracking organisation.
Perhaps if they chose to contract with me for price (high - I value my privacy) then I might consider allowing them to use my data but until then they can stick their cookies up their arse.
I also block connections to ad & tracking companies. I'm not entirely against ads - I appreciate that the revenue supports the site I'm viewing - but not when they're intrusive, garish, flicker, shimmer, move or make noise. Those get blocked.
At first the cookie, script & block requests are frequent but once the blocklist is populated there's quite a drop in the frequency of cookie requests I have to deal with.
Perhaps if they chose to contract with me for price (high - I value my privacy) then I might consider allowing them to use my data but until then they can stick their cookies up their arse.
I also block connections to ad & tracking companies. I'm not entirely against ads - I appreciate that the revenue supports the site I'm viewing - but not when they're intrusive, garish, flicker, shimmer, move or make noise. Those get blocked.
At first the cookie, script & block requests are frequent but once the blocklist is populated there's quite a drop in the frequency of cookie requests I have to deal with.
Official PPRuNe Chaplain
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Witnesham, Suffolk
Age: 79
Posts: 3,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, I got a reply from Paypal Customer Services saying there's no record of them sending me to 2o7.net, so I sent them the relevant line from their e-mail with the link in it.
They replied that there's no record of them sending me to 2o7.net (clearly don't read e-mails, so it's probably a bot). I've written back asking them to investigate urgently before I make a formal complaint under the law.
Anyone know what law governs computer misuse, and who to complain to?
If it's OfCom I won't bother, because significant experience proves they do nowt anyway.
They replied that there's no record of them sending me to 2o7.net (clearly don't read e-mails, so it's probably a bot). I've written back asking them to investigate urgently before I make a formal complaint under the law.
Anyone know what law governs computer misuse, and who to complain to?
If it's OfCom I won't bother, because significant experience proves they do nowt anyway.
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 3,663
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Location: Rural Suffolk (bliss!)
Anyone know what law governs computer misuse, and who to complain to?
OPSI is your friend for more info.... Office of Public Sector Information, all the statutes are there.
and who to complain to?
Last edited by mixture; 16th Jul 2010 at 20:44.
Official PPRuNe Chaplain
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Witnesham, Suffolk
Age: 79
Posts: 3,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oh well. Not going to waste that sort of time and money.
I've put Paypal on my "scammers or security risk" mail blacklist. I can still use 'em to pay for stuff, but they can't e-mail me.
I've put Paypal on my "scammers or security risk" mail blacklist. I can still use 'em to pay for stuff, but they can't e-mail me.
Moderator
Not just PayPal, which I use quite a lot.
I also discovered
vodafone.122.2o7.net
microsoftwindows.112.2o7.net
microsoftsto.112.2o7.net
msnportal.112.2o7.net
in my cookies list.
Needless to say the 2o7.net domain is now blocked completely (I use OpenDNS).
Through a combination of browser, hosts file and DNS configurations, I am gradually reducing the amount of [email protected] dropped onto the Dastard PCs.
SD
I also discovered
vodafone.122.2o7.net
microsoftwindows.112.2o7.net
microsoftsto.112.2o7.net
msnportal.112.2o7.net
in my cookies list.
Needless to say the 2o7.net domain is now blocked completely (I use OpenDNS).
Through a combination of browser, hosts file and DNS configurations, I am gradually reducing the amount of [email protected] dropped onto the Dastard PCs.
SD
