Microsoft ordered to stop selling Word software by Jan 11
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 844
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Microsoft ordered to stop selling Word software by Jan 11
Microsoft ordered to stop selling Word software by Jan 11 - Yahoo! India News
Toronto, Dec 23 (IANS) Upholding patent-infringement charges by a small Toronto firm agaist Microsoft Tuesday, a US appeals court ordered the software giant to stop selling Word by Jan 11 and pay $290 million in damages.
Microsoft said it will introduce the copies of Word 2007 and Office 2007 without the offending technology by the court-ordered deadline. Tuesday's ruling upholds an earlier injunction against Microsoft that banned the technology giant from selling Word.
The ban was imposed by a Texas court in August after Toronto software firm i4i took Microsoft to court for stealing its patented technology for use in the software. The court had also granted $290 million in damages to the Toronto firm.
Microsoft challenged the ruling in the US Federal Circuit Court of Appeals. Tuesday's ruling by a three-judge bench comes into effect from January 11 next year, banning sale of a number of versions of Microsoft's word-processing software.
In its ruling, the appeals court in Washington said, 'In this case, a small company was practicing its patent, only to suffer a loss of market share, brand recognition, and customer goodwill as the result of the defendant's infringing acts.
'The district court (which imposed the ban in August) found that Microsoft captured 80 percent of the custom XML market with its infringing Word products, forcing i4i to change its business strategy.'
The patent stolen by Microsoft was filed by i4i filed in 1998. It pertains to the use of technology that can open documents using the XML computer programming language. The Toronto company said Microsoft stole this technology when it created Word 2003 and Word 2007 software.
Word is the mainstay of Microsoft's business. Its sales accounted for 90 percent of the $18.9-billion earned by the software giant's Microsoft Business division in 2008. Microsoft said it will have new versions of Word 2007 and Office 2007 without the technology patented by the Canadian firm.
In a statement, Microsoft public affairs director Kevin Kutz said his company has 'put the wheels in motion to remove this little-used feature from these products.''
He expected that the copies Microsoft Word 2007 and Office 2007 without the offending technology will be available by January 11.
'In addition, the beta versions of Microsoft Word 2010 and Microsoft Office 2010, which are available now for downloading, do not contain the technology covered by the injunction,'' he said.
Lauding the court verdict, i4i chairman Loudon Owen said in Toronto that he was 'pleased with the ruling from the appeals court which upheld the lower court's decision in its entirety. This is both a vindication for i4i and a war cry for talented inventors whose patents are infringed.''
The Canadian said, 'The same guts and integrity that are needed to invent and go against the herd, are at the heart of success in patent litigation against a behemoth like Microsoft.''
Toronto, Dec 23 (IANS) Upholding patent-infringement charges by a small Toronto firm agaist Microsoft Tuesday, a US appeals court ordered the software giant to stop selling Word by Jan 11 and pay $290 million in damages.
Microsoft said it will introduce the copies of Word 2007 and Office 2007 without the offending technology by the court-ordered deadline. Tuesday's ruling upholds an earlier injunction against Microsoft that banned the technology giant from selling Word.
The ban was imposed by a Texas court in August after Toronto software firm i4i took Microsoft to court for stealing its patented technology for use in the software. The court had also granted $290 million in damages to the Toronto firm.
Microsoft challenged the ruling in the US Federal Circuit Court of Appeals. Tuesday's ruling by a three-judge bench comes into effect from January 11 next year, banning sale of a number of versions of Microsoft's word-processing software.
In its ruling, the appeals court in Washington said, 'In this case, a small company was practicing its patent, only to suffer a loss of market share, brand recognition, and customer goodwill as the result of the defendant's infringing acts.
'The district court (which imposed the ban in August) found that Microsoft captured 80 percent of the custom XML market with its infringing Word products, forcing i4i to change its business strategy.'
The patent stolen by Microsoft was filed by i4i filed in 1998. It pertains to the use of technology that can open documents using the XML computer programming language. The Toronto company said Microsoft stole this technology when it created Word 2003 and Word 2007 software.
Word is the mainstay of Microsoft's business. Its sales accounted for 90 percent of the $18.9-billion earned by the software giant's Microsoft Business division in 2008. Microsoft said it will have new versions of Word 2007 and Office 2007 without the technology patented by the Canadian firm.
In a statement, Microsoft public affairs director Kevin Kutz said his company has 'put the wheels in motion to remove this little-used feature from these products.''
He expected that the copies Microsoft Word 2007 and Office 2007 without the offending technology will be available by January 11.
'In addition, the beta versions of Microsoft Word 2010 and Microsoft Office 2010, which are available now for downloading, do not contain the technology covered by the injunction,'' he said.
Lauding the court verdict, i4i chairman Loudon Owen said in Toronto that he was 'pleased with the ruling from the appeals court which upheld the lower court's decision in its entirety. This is both a vindication for i4i and a war cry for talented inventors whose patents are infringed.''
The Canadian said, 'The same guts and integrity that are needed to invent and go against the herd, are at the heart of success in patent litigation against a behemoth like Microsoft.''
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 844
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If that's not calling the Kettle black!!!
Lets all download the Office validation tool.
Even if a little used feature of the patented program belonging to other than M/S, piracy is piracy now isn't it?
Even the big ones get caught.
Lets all download the Office validation tool.
Even if a little used feature of the patented program belonging to other than M/S, piracy is piracy now isn't it?
Even the big ones get caught.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: LONDON
Age: 51
Posts: 525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Would love to know where they plucked the figures of word being 90% of microsofts income. Office as a suite is a high proportion of their income however it was always considered to be around the 40% mark, with windows, development tools and RDBMS's making up the rest.
Talk about loaded language, eh? "Stolen"? "Banned"? It's a software patent dispute: a little company got in there first and is enforcing their patent, which is so generalised that it was going to catch someone some day. I just read it (US PTO #5,787,449 on Google Patent Search): it's full of talk about "Metacodes", which simply means "code describing code". No mention of XML, which was not around in 1994, when the patent was taken out.
Microsoft has not been banned from selling Word; this dispute covers one particular feature, "Custom XML". This doesn't even affect Excel or PowerPoint, which also use XML file formats - that's what the X in DOCX or XLSX stands for.
I'm no Microsoft fan, and have pretty-much migrated to Linux already, but even I can see that this piece is knee-jerk Microsoft-bashing. The Computerworld article takes a more sensible tone, as do i4i themselves.
Microsoft has not been banned from selling Word; this dispute covers one particular feature, "Custom XML". This doesn't even affect Excel or PowerPoint, which also use XML file formats - that's what the X in DOCX or XLSX stands for.
I'm no Microsoft fan, and have pretty-much migrated to Linux already, but even I can see that this piece is knee-jerk Microsoft-bashing. The Computerworld article takes a more sensible tone, as do i4i themselves.
Last edited by bnt; 24th Dec 2009 at 08:17.
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: U.K.
Posts: 805
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As far as I am concerned this "little used" feature in Word 2007 introduced the .docx format which has had the desired effect: As it was pre-loaded on new computers, users started using it and thus, for a time, other users of the previous versions of Word were unable to read .docx files. Thus they were forced to acquire their own copies of word 2007. This was really why Microshaft wanted to do it and have no doubt made significant profits from their action - and it why we call them Microshaft!
Although there is now a patch available which enables some earlier versions of Word to read .docx files, I bet that this court decision will not require all versions of Word to generate .doc files by default and scrap the .docx format!
P.P.
Although there is now a patch available which enables some earlier versions of Word to read .docx files, I bet that this court decision will not require all versions of Word to generate .doc files by default and scrap the .docx format!
P.P.
Psychophysiological entity
Reading the above leaves me confused.
The Beta copy that I'm running can generate .docx files. (indeed it seems to be the default)
If the offending soft is what enables the generation of this file type, how can my copy not have it embedded?
The Beta copy that I'm running can generate .docx files. (indeed it seems to be the default)
If the offending soft is what enables the generation of this file type, how can my copy not have it embedded?
