Windows XP Update
Thread Starter
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 309
Likes: 4
From: Living In The Past
Windows XP Update
When I go to the Update page & click on "Scan For Updates" , the next screen sticks on 0% & shows a warning of a page fault then a page error - so no updates !
the page is <a href="http://v4.windowsupdate.microsoft.com/en/default.asp" target="_blank">http://v4.windowsupdate.microsoft.com/en/default.asp</a>
I know there is a security problem with XP just now so I'm wondering if the stuff is currently being updated.
Anyone else having this problem please, or has my setup gone wonky ?
the page is <a href="http://v4.windowsupdate.microsoft.com/en/default.asp" target="_blank">http://v4.windowsupdate.microsoft.com/en/default.asp</a>
I know there is a security problem with XP just now so I'm wondering if the stuff is currently being updated.
Anyone else having this problem please, or has my setup gone wonky ?
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 1,274
Likes: 0
From: Glen Prosen, Scotland
Is it right that XP has a feature that only lets you install it on one computer (activation or something)? and if so, and I get fed up and format my hard disc, which I do fairly often, does that count as a second installation?
I suspect the day of the Mac draws steadily nearer.
I suspect the day of the Mac draws steadily nearer.
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
From: STL
Eric, if you want a link to the patch that was put out two days ago, then see the thread called Win98 ME XP Critical Security Patch. I posted the initial message of that thread shortly after Microsoft issued the bulletin. I copied from that bulletin verbatim. Within hours the URL supplied by Microsoft was not functional. What a way to run a company. The second message in the thread has the new URL. It is still working - but act fast!
The security gap is astounding. Any attacker can take over your machine and do anything with it that a computer is capable of doing. (You know, send viruses, send threatening messages to world leaders - all tracable to you.)
Like FL310 I can't help you with XP problems. People don't want XP. They want Win9X fixes and licenses to run it on new machines. But Bill doesn't sell any of those.
DB6, not sure about the Mac but suspect linux will be the solution to the Microsoft problem.
The security gap is astounding. Any attacker can take over your machine and do anything with it that a computer is capable of doing. (You know, send viruses, send threatening messages to world leaders - all tracable to you.)
Like FL310 I can't help you with XP problems. People don't want XP. They want Win9X fixes and licenses to run it on new machines. But Bill doesn't sell any of those.
DB6, not sure about the Mac but suspect linux will be the solution to the Microsoft problem.
Joined: Oct 1998
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
From: UK
yes Brian...well spotted....Linux is the answer!
All the handling is easy, and beside some free versions, I bought one for about £55 which comes with 7 CDs and one DVD, all the manuals, stunning fast and until now (2 months) 24/7 switched on and not crashed once.....
Installing the hardware is not always plug and play but, easier as compared to windows, I got all up and running.
All the handling is easy, and beside some free versions, I bought one for about £55 which comes with 7 CDs and one DVD, all the manuals, stunning fast and until now (2 months) 24/7 switched on and not crashed once.....
Installing the hardware is not always plug and play but, easier as compared to windows, I got all up and running.
Scourge of Bad Airline Management!
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,245
Likes: 229
From: Global Nomad
A few thoughts...
1. The Activation function is used to stop the software being used on a number of machines. It records the serial numbers of your kit's components, and sends these off to MS; you can then change a few (3?) things before you have to have a chat with MS, which would be a formality. If you have to reinstall your copy on the same machine, this does NOT count as a new activation, although you will have to reactivate.... if you see what I mean!
2. In defence of XP - I find it stable, faster than 9x, and, now that the drivers are coming through, very easy to configure.
3. As for the security thing, yes, MS should have got it right first time, but the patch (on my PC anyway) downloaded silently in the background, and on next reboot, was done.
4. Linux is fine to a point - if you can get all your drivers (which can be a pain). Also, I'm a believer in that the only reason Linux seems more secure is that the virus writers haven't got round to it yet - there is more fun to be had with 9x because of the volume of users. When you get many millions of Linux folks out there, watch out.
5. The Windows Upgrade site did seem to have a few teething probs, but now seems OK....
TA
1. The Activation function is used to stop the software being used on a number of machines. It records the serial numbers of your kit's components, and sends these off to MS; you can then change a few (3?) things before you have to have a chat with MS, which would be a formality. If you have to reinstall your copy on the same machine, this does NOT count as a new activation, although you will have to reactivate.... if you see what I mean!
2. In defence of XP - I find it stable, faster than 9x, and, now that the drivers are coming through, very easy to configure.
3. As for the security thing, yes, MS should have got it right first time, but the patch (on my PC anyway) downloaded silently in the background, and on next reboot, was done.
4. Linux is fine to a point - if you can get all your drivers (which can be a pain). Also, I'm a believer in that the only reason Linux seems more secure is that the virus writers haven't got round to it yet - there is more fun to be had with 9x because of the volume of users. When you get many millions of Linux folks out there, watch out.
5. The Windows Upgrade site did seem to have a few teething probs, but now seems OK....
TA
