Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Computer/Internet Issues & Troubleshooting
Reload this Page >

Google Earth definition / clarity

Wikiposts
Search
Computer/Internet Issues & Troubleshooting Anyone with questions about the terribly complex world of computers or the internet should try here. NOT FOR REPORTING ISSUES WITH PPRuNe FORUMS! Please use the subforum "PPRuNe Problems or Queries."

Google Earth definition / clarity

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd Jul 2007, 18:26
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Great White North eh!
Age: 84
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Google Earth definition / clarity

Why are certain areas of Google Earth highly detailed - when viewing from a height of eye of, say, 1000 mts and others a total blur? Roughly the same latitude so that shouldn't be the issue.
Are some of the areas restricted? For example: one miliary dockyard very detailed but countryside a total blur.
aspinwing is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2007, 18:46
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: slightly left of you
Age: 43
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Whilst google earth starts with sattelite pictures, the lower down you get, the higher the likelyhood is that the pictures were taken from an aircraft, so it's just dependant on whether or not there are commercial aerial pictures available for the area.

The best british commercial sattelite has a definiton of 2m x 2m so not very useful for detailed pics for google earth.
cortilla is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2007, 19:40
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: 39N 77W
Posts: 1,630
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Today's Washington Post has a discussion of Google Earth resolution in central DC. They say that Google had two options: (1) high resolution images from an official source which had a number of locations fuzzed out, or (2) somewhat less sharp images of this area which had not been further degraded. They chose (2) for parts of central DC. They used the high resolution official pictures for the rest of the city.

Edited to note that the newspaper story was about Google Maps, not Earth. I don't see "fuzzing" on either Maps or Earth, except at the Naval Observatory where the Vice-Presidential Mansion is located. The story seems incorrect to me. I find that some atomic electric generating stations in the USA are low resolution while others are not.

Last edited by seacue; 23rd Jul 2007 at 00:00.
seacue is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2007, 20:24
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 789
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looking at my house on Google Earth, the picture gets suspiciously fuzzy about half way across the road. The other side of the street is fine. Is it because I have a secret Uranium enrichment facility in the shed?
A Very Civil Pilot is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2007, 01:07
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Great White North eh!
Age: 84
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lightbulb Makes sense

The different sources would seem to be the answer. The key is the copyright notice at the bottom of the page. I had not paid attention to it. While checking a few areas, I had up to three copyright notices; Digital Globe, TerraMetrics, Europa Technologies, Navteq and even Yellowpages.ca.

I take comfort on knowing that my new home will not be a target as it is totally fuzzy.

Thanks
aspinwing is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2007, 10:57
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: U.K.
Posts: 805
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Google intentially reduce the definition of some of the higher resolution areas on the free google earth system. I know this because recently I was inspecting a presentaltion for a local possible planning application for land at the back of my house. I recognised the aerial photograph - the colour and position of the parked cars, the lack of certain recently added extensions and conservatories and in the bottom rhight hand corner was the copyright Google symbol. However this paid for photograph was of much higher definition than the indentical image I was used to on my computer screen.

P.P.
P.Pilcher is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.