Notices
Computer/Internet Issues & Troubleshooting Anyone with questions about the terribly complex world of computers or the internet should try here. NOT FOR REPORTING ISSUES WITH PPRuNe FORUMS! Please use the subforum "PPRuNe Problems or Queries."

Image use question

Old 24th September 2006 | 21:03
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter

Coppula eam se non posit acceptera jocularum
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
From: Northumberland, UK
Question Image use question

Question concerning something happening on another (less well moderated!) site that Mrs ES frequents.

Photograph of somebody taken and placed on forum. Person complains that they do not want this photo on forum, especially where photo appears in subsequent thread. As a complication, photo sometimes photoshopped in a derogatory manner. Is an offence or actionable tort (UK law) being committed or is it, as I suspect, tough luck? Or rather, my best guess is that tough luck with regard to the original, although one might be able to pursue the photoshoppers, except that would be such a hydra headed exercise only an obsessive would bother.
Evening Star is offline  
Reply
Old 24th September 2006 | 21:27
  #2 (permalink)  
Recidivist
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,240
Likes: 0
From: Essex, UK
Wouldn't like to comment on the derogatory part, but possible infringement of copyright usually owned by person who took picture.
frostbite is offline  
Reply
Old 27th September 2006 | 14:06
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: manchester
being on the net in the uk doesnt abslove anyone from uk law. the usual law/s applies to net just as in the real world.
the trouble is of course, enforcing it. virtually impossible. esp if the accused is 12000 miles away.

better to try the forum moderator/webmaster to remove the offensive material. most decent sites will comply.
ormus55 is offline  
Reply
Old 27th September 2006 | 16:56
  #4 (permalink)  
TheVillagePhotographer.co.uk
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,078
Likes: 0
From: Cotswolds UK
Frostbite has it in one. Now for a "model" or commercial shoot, (though I still largely stay with Airfix) you would need a Model release form to effectively sign away their rights to the photographer who still holds copyright. I think that for commercial premises, locations etc. that they also have rights which border onto and maybe into intellectual property rights. It is a grey area in which m'learned friends would throw much enlightenment (God - Did I really say that?) and at a cost to knock your socks off no doubt.

The first and most valuable tool however, is common courtesy and it is free too. If anybody objects, then an apology and the removal of any images from wherever specified, will hardly ever fail to do the trick.

Conan
Conan the Librarian is offline  
Reply
Old 30th September 2006 | 12:26
  #5 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 21
Likes: 2
From: Chilterns
I think a "Model Release" is not required if the Photo is used for "News" Purposes, ie in the public interest. Thats how the Tabloids get away with it.
Milvus Milvus is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.