Thread navigation
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 1999
Location: At Home
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thread navigation
The little tick-mark at the left of a thread title is supposed to take you to the first unread message. This used to work perfectly on my system ( XP sp2 + firefox) prior to the latest site upgrade. Unfortunately, it now takes me to the last post in the thread which, in an active thread, results in much scrolling in order to locate the correct part of the thread.
In the grand scheme of things this is merely a minor irritant but if anyone knows how to restore the correct functionality i would be most obliged.
I have tried deleting all the Pprune cookies but it had no effect.
In the grand scheme of things this is merely a minor irritant but if anyone knows how to restore the correct functionality i would be most obliged.
I have tried deleting all the Pprune cookies but it had no effect.
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
shaky - I think this change is something at the host software end and we can look at it later (may need to remind me!!). I don't think there is anything you can do on your machine.
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 1999
Location: At Home
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thank you all for taking the time to reply.
PpruneTowers:
I have re-visited my User CP but I can see nothing that might cure my problem. Could you give me a hint?
Prune Luver:
Before the site upgrade the utility did exactly as it said on the tin. In other words the thread opened at the first new post since the last time you logged in - very useful and eliminated a lot of fiddling about on active multi-paged threads. Since the upgrade this is no longer the case and it simply directs you to the last post in the thread which is in fact the function of the tick-mark to the right hand side of the thread title.
BOAC:
I think your explanation is correct. It seems to be a site related thing because another location which I visit has the same software and it works as intended. As I said, it is a small niggle in the grand scheme of things but if it isn't fixed I will gladly accept your offer and give you a reminder in a couple of weeks.
Regards to all.
PpruneTowers:
I have re-visited my User CP but I can see nothing that might cure my problem. Could you give me a hint?
Prune Luver:
Before the site upgrade the utility did exactly as it said on the tin. In other words the thread opened at the first new post since the last time you logged in - very useful and eliminated a lot of fiddling about on active multi-paged threads. Since the upgrade this is no longer the case and it simply directs you to the last post in the thread which is in fact the function of the tick-mark to the right hand side of the thread title.
BOAC:
I think your explanation is correct. It seems to be a site related thing because another location which I visit has the same software and it works as intended. As I said, it is a small niggle in the grand scheme of things but if it isn't fixed I will gladly accept your offer and give you a reminder in a couple of weeks.
Regards to all.
Last edited by shaky; 3rd Feb 2006 at 17:14.
Too mean to buy a long personal title
Originally Posted by shaky
The little tick-mark at the left of a thread title is supposed to take you to the first unread message. This used to work perfectly on my system ( XP sp2 + firefox) prior to the latest site upgrade. Unfortunately, it now takes me to the last post in the thread which, in an active thread, results in much scrolling in order to locate the correct part of the thread.
- [*]
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Glob - it seems 'none of the above'. I am in discussion with PPTowers about it and I am convinced it is just the ignition timing or mixture control that needs tweaking on the PP Engine. Just need a few days.
Join Date: Jan 1997
Location: UK
Posts: 7,737
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Never used the facility you describe so don't know whether it was original, kludge, hack or plug in.
Perhaps a more useful avenue is to speak to a site using it and find out what it is, how it works and where they found it.
Regards
Rob
Perhaps a more useful avenue is to speak to a site using it and find out what it is, how it works and where they found it.
Regards
Rob
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Don't know if there is a 'clue' here, PPT? From the VB user manual:
"Thread/Forum Read Marking Type
This option controls how threads and forums are marked as read. The options are:
1) Inactivity/Cookie Based - once a user has been inactive for a certain amount of time (the value of the cookie timeout option) all threads and forums are considered read. Individual threads are marked as read within a session via cookies. This option is how all versions of vBulletin before 3.5 functioned.
2) Database (no automatic forum marking) - this option uses the database to store thread and forum read times. This allows accurate read markers to be kept indefinitely. However, in order for a forum to be marked read when all threads are read, the user must view the list of threads for that forum. This option is more space and processor intensive than inactivity-based marking.
3) Database (automatic forum marking) - this option is the same as a previous option, but forums are automatically marked as read when the last new thread is read. This is the most usable option for end users, but most processor intensive."
My italics
"Thread/Forum Read Marking Type
This option controls how threads and forums are marked as read. The options are:
1) Inactivity/Cookie Based - once a user has been inactive for a certain amount of time (the value of the cookie timeout option) all threads and forums are considered read. Individual threads are marked as read within a session via cookies. This option is how all versions of vBulletin before 3.5 functioned.
2) Database (no automatic forum marking) - this option uses the database to store thread and forum read times. This allows accurate read markers to be kept indefinitely. However, in order for a forum to be marked read when all threads are read, the user must view the list of threads for that forum. This option is more space and processor intensive than inactivity-based marking.
3) Database (automatic forum marking) - this option is the same as a previous option, but forums are automatically marked as read when the last new thread is read. This is the most usable option for end users, but most processor intensive."
My italics
Join Date: Jan 1997
Location: UK
Posts: 7,737
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Forum was set at the default BOAC - I checked before my original reply.
Wonder if turning security setting down a notch or too might help. Long history of our page items being misidentified by such systems.
Rob
Wonder if turning security setting down a notch or too might help. Long history of our page items being misidentified by such systems.
Rob
aka Capt PPRuNe
Join Date: May 1995
Location: UK
Posts: 4,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Inactivity/Cookie based is the setting for PPRuNe as it is the least server intensive mode.
Just for information and to avoid any embarrasement if you make promises you can't keep, these cosmetic issues are very low priority at the moment and will be dealt with and rectified, if at all possible, as and when time permits.
Just for information and to avoid any embarrasement if you make promises you can't keep, these cosmetic issues are very low priority at the moment and will be dealt with and rectified, if at all possible, as and when time permits.
Too mean to buy a long personal title
Originally Posted by BOAC
Edited to say it does NOT appear to be working, shaky, so I'd better leave the country
