Firewall to go with NTL Netguard?
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
From: cambridge
Firewall to go with NTL Netguard?
Considering upgrading my NIS 2003 to 2005, but on hearing how much it will slow the pc (Celeron 1Ghz W2000 pro), I have decided to hold off.
I have NTL broadband who offer their Netguard AV free but with no firewall. W2000 having no firewall, I need one. Any suggestions as to which to use?
Also any opinions on Netguard's efficiency/effectiveness including interworking with other firewalls.
Or should I forget about NTL freebies and stump up for the Zonealarm suite?
I have NTL broadband who offer their Netguard AV free but with no firewall. W2000 having no firewall, I need one. Any suggestions as to which to use?
Also any opinions on Netguard's efficiency/effectiveness including interworking with other firewalls.
Or should I forget about NTL freebies and stump up for the Zonealarm suite?
Administrator
Joined: Mar 2001
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 8,121
Likes: 686
From: Twickenham, home of rugby
I would unhesitatingly recommend a hardware firewall.
£50 gets you a firewall / switch (4-port) / router from Netgear / D-link / Vigor etc.
A further £25 or so gets Wireless and / or printer port.
Network multiple PCs, all with access to the Internet safely behind a hardware firewall for not much more than the cost of the software firewall - and nothing to slow down your PC.
No-brainer for me!
SD
£50 gets you a firewall / switch (4-port) / router from Netgear / D-link / Vigor etc.
A further £25 or so gets Wireless and / or printer port.
Network multiple PCs, all with access to the Internet safely behind a hardware firewall for not much more than the cost of the software firewall - and nothing to slow down your PC.
No-brainer for me!
SD
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
From: Cheshire, UK
I've used BlackIce as a software firewall for several years now on BT, NTL, AOL and Telewest Broadband.
It has had some questionable reviews in the past. However, I have found it to be very easy to use/configure and extremely effective. I also think it excellent value for money - especially if you buy the 2 year licence option.
My only criticism is that is appears not to fail 'closed' as any decent firewall should. I use Hibernate and occasionally it doesn't like being 'woken up'. I may be wrong in this but I always boot up with my Internet connection disabled so not an issue.
It has a very low overhead and has had little or no performance effect on any machine I have installed it on.
For sure, a hardware firewall is the best solution, and there are many products available now which do not require you to understand too much about port numbers and writing access lists, rules etc..
I also agree with the performance implications of NIS. A good, solid product but can severely affect boot up time and general performance.
It has had some questionable reviews in the past. However, I have found it to be very easy to use/configure and extremely effective. I also think it excellent value for money - especially if you buy the 2 year licence option.
My only criticism is that is appears not to fail 'closed' as any decent firewall should. I use Hibernate and occasionally it doesn't like being 'woken up'. I may be wrong in this but I always boot up with my Internet connection disabled so not an issue.
It has a very low overhead and has had little or no performance effect on any machine I have installed it on.
For sure, a hardware firewall is the best solution, and there are many products available now which do not require you to understand too much about port numbers and writing access lists, rules etc..
I also agree with the performance implications of NIS. A good, solid product but can severely affect boot up time and general performance.
