Aerolineas Argentinas low level flyby on revenue flight
That is definitely the airport right in the centre of Buenos Aires, not the international one (which is presumably where he was being paid to fly to)...
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: East Sussex
Age: 86
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I seem to remember that an AF pilot tried to the same sort of thing at Habsheim in an A320 some while ago with rather less success. At least this time the guy had his gear down which simplified matters somewhat.
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Blingland
Age: 56
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think you will find there was some sort of Festival going on, fill your boots with these flypasts.
The Aviationist » Watch this: How insanely low you can fly a civilian jet liner!
The Aviationist » Watch this: How insanely low you can fly a civilian jet liner!
Join Date: May 2010
Location: The blasted heath
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Many moons ago and a DC10-10 with 380 bums on seats + crew out of LGW for MCO and a low level fly past at the Biggin Hill airshow.
No hullabaloo no fuss and the punters got a bit extra for their money.
No hullabaloo no fuss and the punters got a bit extra for their money.
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: East Sussex
Age: 86
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Actually he didn't. He thought he knew all about the beast and pulled some cbs he thought to circumvent AB safety protocols that would not let the ac go below a certain height without the gear down. (i forget how high that was.) Unluckily for him those cbs also controlled other functions hence his elegant descent into the trees. It did prove how relatively strong an AB was though.
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Kansas
Age: 85
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
But if this really did happen at Aeroparque (SABE/AEP) then there's no scheduled A343 service there -- that is the in-city commuter airport.
Long-haul flights go to Ezeiza (SAEZ/EZE) outside the city.
One thing to say it was just a go-around for fun and then proceeded to land -- another thing to have done it all at a completely different airport.
Long-haul flights go to Ezeiza (SAEZ/EZE) outside the city.
One thing to say it was just a go-around for fun and then proceeded to land -- another thing to have done it all at a completely different airport.
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: netherlands
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think you will find there was some sort of Festival going on, fill your
boots with these flypasts.
The Aviationist » Watch this: How insanely low you can fly a
civilian jet liner!
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: UK
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Strikes me as pretty damned stupid and arrogant, approved or not, passengers or not - a little bit of turbulence off a hangar or a bird down an engine and you have no height or time to correct a resulting flight path variation. Airliners are too big and have too little agility/responsiveness to be doing that sort of flypast. A few hundred feet is one thing, but a few tens of feet is another - it looks clever, but anyone with a small amount of wit knows how stupid it is. It's the same as boy racers in their hot hatches and on their bikes.
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Aus
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Actually he didn't. He thought he knew all about the beast and pulled some cbs
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
a little bit of turbulence off a hangar or a bird down an engine and you have no height or time to correct a resulting flight path variation. Airliners are too big and have too little agility/responsiveness
I seem to recall a story of a captain from a certain Asian carrier who was dismissed after conducting a similar manoeuvre at BFI on a delivery flight with a brand new B777. He'd been given the okay by his boss riding in the back but was subsequently axed when it made the news back home and some higher-ups were embarrassed.
It looks innocent enough but I have to wonder of the sensibility of doing it, given the tendency for innocent looking stuff to go viral on social media these days. Wanna play? Go rent a Citabria on the weekend.
It looks innocent enough but I have to wonder of the sensibility of doing it, given the tendency for innocent looking stuff to go viral on social media these days. Wanna play? Go rent a Citabria on the weekend.
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Buenos Aires
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The pilot's name is , ex boss of the pilots union and thick as, erm, thieves with the government, the same govt that owns aerolineas, so connections like that bring privilges.
Thread Starter
Thank you for the replies, pro and con. It was posted a bit tongue-in-cheek: thirty years ago as a passenger or in a jumpseat I was much more gung-ho; at 68 I'm a bit more conservative regarding my own skin and that of others - for some reason I like more "perfectly safe" layers.
Just to clarify: the flypast was over the domestic Jorge Newberry runway in Buenos Aires and the aircraft then went on to land at Ezeiza. Miami-Ezeiza is what, around 11.5 hours?
Just to clarify: the flypast was over the domestic Jorge Newberry runway in Buenos Aires and the aircraft then went on to land at Ezeiza. Miami-Ezeiza is what, around 11.5 hours?
Ironic really, the captain involved in the Post #37 flypast had been a member of Cathay Pacific's infamous 'Star Chamber' that fired a group of pilots 'for no particular reason' 'pour encourager les autres'. The 777 had company passengers and a trans-Pacific fuel load on board.
And he ended up fired himself.
And he ended up fired himself.
Last edited by Captain Dart; 22nd Nov 2013 at 22:49.
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: england
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thats nothing, I flew on a BA737 a few weeks ago, LHR to ABZ, the crew were useless. They got so low the wheels actually hit the runway, and the aircraft had to stop and taxi to the gate to inspect for damage! . Who do I sue for being put in such danger?
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 3,093
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What prevented the Alpha Floor protection from activating was being well below 100ft RA, and the reasons for that start with the crew being incorrectly briefed - they were expecting an approach to the paved runway, not the grass strip, and the charts they were given were incorrectly photocopied - the tree graphics at the end of the grass strip were of a greyscale too light to transfer. Finding themselves off-course, fast and high, the Captain elected to try to salvage the first approach rather than turn back and try again, and in doing so he pulled the throttles back too far, causing the engines to spool down. The combination of ending up lower and slower than the intended profile with the engines spooled down meant that by the time they noticed the trees were an obstacle there was not enough time for the engines to spool up and begin building up airspeed, and the crash was at that point inevitable.
The flyby in this AA case was a very different matter - the profile AoA was well short of demonstrating Alpha Prot, the runway had no obstacles at the far end, and it does at least appear that the manoeuvre was properly briefed and executed - you can't compare it with AF296 in that regard. As has been pointed out, it was far more akin to a scheduled go-around than an airshow flypast.
I did recently find this demonstration (to the best of my knowledge without pax aboard) of a correctly-briefed and performed demonstration of Alpha Prot and Alpha Floor on an A330 - compare and contrast! :
Last edited by DozyWannabe; 23rd Nov 2013 at 01:22.