Class 1 visual requirements in Canada
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Go to Transport Canada Website
I belive is 20/20 corrected 6/600 uncorected.
More info on the site
Hi Dash8
I found the stuff for you: http://www.tc.gc.ca/aviation/regserv...rs/t42402e.htm
hope it works
Bigpela
I belive is 20/20 corrected 6/600 uncorected.
More info on the site
Hi Dash8
I found the stuff for you: http://www.tc.gc.ca/aviation/regserv...rs/t42402e.htm
hope it works
Bigpela
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,085
Likes: 0
From: Canada
As you probably know, in the USA a 1st class medical essentially doesn't required any specific uncorrected vision standard; as long as you can be corrected to 20/20, that's sufficient. Makes sense to me, since I've never flown without my glasses!
I looked into this issue about 3-4 years ago, at which time both ICAO and TC told me that they were "considering" adopting an approach similar to that of the USA. I don't know what progress has been made (things move very slowly at ICAO), but if your uncorrected vision is not up to snuff, it would be worth your while to make specific enquiries of TC's medical people rather than be deterred by what is on the Physical and Mental Requirements chart.
I looked into this issue about 3-4 years ago, at which time both ICAO and TC told me that they were "considering" adopting an approach similar to that of the USA. I don't know what progress has been made (things move very slowly at ICAO), but if your uncorrected vision is not up to snuff, it would be worth your while to make specific enquiries of TC's medical people rather than be deterred by what is on the Physical and Mental Requirements chart.
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 18
Likes: 43
From: Halifax, NS
Despite what the docs say, you can be class 1 certfified as long as you can be corrected to 20/20. There are no uncorrected limits as of about a year ago. There are also no diopter limits.
I have a canadian class 1 with -5.75, -5.25 and worse than 2/600 uncorrected.
Cheers,
Andrew
I have a canadian class 1 with -5.75, -5.25 and worse than 2/600 uncorrected.
Cheers,
Andrew
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 18
Likes: 43
From: Halifax, NS
Just to back up what I said before. Before I applied for my Transport Canada medical I email them to ask what the current situation was. In my email I stated that I was over both the stated diopter and uncorrected vision limits.
This is the reply I received:
---
Mr Crawford,
Canada is in the process of removing the diopteric limits from the vision
standards, so provided you can correct your distant vision to 6/9 ( 20/30
) in each eye separately and 6/6 using both eyes, then we would consider
you fit for all medical categories
Sincerely
XXXX
---
Furthermore I do now hold a full class 1 medical despite having worse than -5 correction in both eyes, and pretty bad uncorrected vision. So I can confirm that what the gentleman from TC told me is correct - as long as you can be corrected to 20:20 using both eyes, you can be class 1 certified.
The -3.5 thing is a thing of the past.
Cheers,
Andrew
This is the reply I received:
---
Mr Crawford,
Canada is in the process of removing the diopteric limits from the vision
standards, so provided you can correct your distant vision to 6/9 ( 20/30
) in each eye separately and 6/6 using both eyes, then we would consider
you fit for all medical categories
Sincerely
XXXX
---
Furthermore I do now hold a full class 1 medical despite having worse than -5 correction in both eyes, and pretty bad uncorrected vision. So I can confirm that what the gentleman from TC told me is correct - as long as you can be corrected to 20:20 using both eyes, you can be class 1 certified.
The -3.5 thing is a thing of the past.
Cheers,
Andrew
Great news
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,085
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Message for Woodey
Unfortunately, it appears that the JAA standards still have the refraction limits, although at +/-5 dioptres they are somewhat more lenient than Canada's (old) standard (+/- 3.5 dioptres). On the other hand, if you exceed the tolerances you can't get a medical certificate even if you undergo laser surgery and wind up with perfect vision, which I don't believe was the case here.
See generally http://www.caa.co.uk/srg/med/default.asp?page=537
See generally http://www.caa.co.uk/srg/med/default.asp?page=537
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,085
Likes: 0
From: Canada
I agree.
When I was speaking with the head medico at ICAO a few years ago, he told me that people with high refractive errors (like me!
) are at higher risk of various eye diseases. Probably that risk would continue after laser surgery, and that's why the JAA won't recognize it as a 'cure' for myopia. However, the ICAO fellow also told me that the extra risk could be effectively managed by requiring regular opthamological checkups, so ... 
For more information on the Canadian position re laser surgery, see here
When I was speaking with the head medico at ICAO a few years ago, he told me that people with high refractive errors (like me!
) are at higher risk of various eye diseases. Probably that risk would continue after laser surgery, and that's why the JAA won't recognize it as a 'cure' for myopia. However, the ICAO fellow also told me that the extra risk could be effectively managed by requiring regular opthamological checkups, so ... For more information on the Canadian position re laser surgery, see here
Last edited by MLS-12D; 5th May 2003 at 23:01.
