Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Canada
Reload this Page >

Nav procedures between lat and long waypoints

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Canada The great white north. A BIG country with few people and LOTS of aviation.

Nav procedures between lat and long waypoints

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th August 2024 | 08:58
  #1 (permalink)  
RMC
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 578
Likes: 2
From: Sutton
Nav procedures between lat and long waypoints

Hi,

I am new to Canadian airspace and assumed when flying remote continental between latitude and longitude waypoints I should check tracks and distances and plot on the Jep app as I would in oceanic airspace. Can’t find the rules on this or indeed if someNorth Canadian airspace is designated RNP10?
RMC is offline  
Reply
Old 30th August 2024 | 01:03
  #2 (permalink)  
20 Countries Visited
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 1,027
Likes: 120
From: Wherever I go, there I am
The wording in the AIP regarding RNP 4 is a little vague. The only mention of it is in the ENR section where it talks about ADS-B services in the Edmonton FIR (section 1.6.3.1). It says RNP 4 is required where VHF voice communication is not possible, but the map they show indicates you'll get VHF voice in all but the most extreme north (Axel Heiberg Island, Ellesmere Island, those types of spots). I don't see anywhere where RNAV 10 is discussed.

With that all being said, there are some spots over the NWT and Nunavut where I've seen the FMC transition to RNP 4 on its own, and to be honest, even though we're well within 60 minutes of an airport, they're sometimes not an airport I want to go back to unless I'm on fire. I'll still run the track and distance checks and plotting on Jepp anytime I'm north of 60 and not going to Yellowknife or Whitehorse and back, but thats just for practice. I've noticed most guys and gals I fly with do them too, even though it's only required by our ops manual for oceanic airspace.

If someone knows different though, I'd love to hear about it, because it's a common question at work too - whether we're working too hard or not.
+TSRA is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd September 2024 | 13:54
  #3 (permalink)  
RMC
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 578
Likes: 2
From: Sutton
It’s an interesting one. We have the same issue in the south Atlantic. Outside NATS airspace so our ops manual doesn’t require it but always do it anyway.
RMC is offline  
Reply
Old 4th September 2024 | 19:21
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 7,172
Likes: 292
From: Nanaimo (CAC8)
I ran this thread by a controller friend who works in the radar environment of the southern Edmonton FIR. His response was:

Not my world - there is a group of controllers who do “Arctic High Level” control and nobody understands what they do except for them.

Last edited by India Four Two; 4th September 2024 at 19:46.
India Four Two is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.