AC is heading down the wrong path
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Canadian Shield
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
QUITE INCREDIBLE...... 31"....... EVEN VEAL CALVES GET A MINIMUM OF 32" (80CMS)!!!!!!!!!
Wot 'e said! 
I haven't travelled on AC for at least 10 years, and that is because my previous experiences had been so bad, on both transatlantic and domestics. A great pity and certainly not me seeing the worst as I like Canada and the Canadians, but the airline's service, specially on the ground, left a lot to be desired. I think AC had an identity crisis at least on domestic/regional routes and was never sure whether to be a legacy carrier or a LoCo. A sure way to lose customers at both ends of the spectrum. My last trips to Canada have been on LOT, Swiss, AirTransat, Lufthansa, and KLM, all significantly better than my recalled experiences of AC.
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As well, there are only 5 in the picture (currently) and no plans (currently) to convert already delivered 777s.
The -200LRs which currently have 269 seats, will be receiving an additional 31 seats overall. Same new seats the -300ERs are getting. New seat count will be 300.
Economy will be 10 abreast now.
