Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Canada
Reload this Page >

VFR to FL180??

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Canada The great white north. A BIG country with few people and LOTS of aviation.

VFR to FL180??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th January 2005 | 16:28
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
From: Not a huge sand box but very nice winters anymore
VFR to FL180??

Anyone know why we don't go VFR to FL180?? I cannot think of any reason why we shouldn't be doing that instead of restricting ourselves to 12'500!! Anyone from TC have an answer??
saudipc-9 is offline  
Old 10th January 2005 | 17:39
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
From: Canada
You can do "controlled" VFR from 12,500' up to 17,500', I beleive.
hibypassratio is offline  
Old 10th January 2005 | 20:10
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Controled VFR is authorised in Canada to 17 500ft. You can find the specific in your AIP under the RAC section (RAC 5.6) but basically you need a CVFR flight plan, a CVFR clearance and be able to navigated as if you were flying IFR and remain VFR in VMC. The only benefit is that one needs no IFR qualification.

Cheers.

D
fougapilot is offline  
Old 10th January 2005 | 20:26
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
From: Canada, CYYC
I was thinking that you would need VMC up to FL 180 to do it... not really practical if you asked me.
Canadian Beech is offline  
Old 11th January 2005 | 06:38
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: canada
its my understanding that you can fly up to FL180 VFR if you're in class G. ie//up north
skudrunner is offline  
Old 11th January 2005 | 12:42
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
From: Land of the midnight sun
We used to go CVFR in the 1900D as we did not have an OPS SPEC at the time to go no alternate IFR. By going CVFR we could get more weight aboard the aircraft due to the fact we would have VFR fuel requirements! This worked out great from an operational standpoint.
R8TED THRUST is offline  
Old 12th January 2005 | 16:24
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
From: Not a huge sand box but very nice winters anymore
Controlled VFR still doesn't make much sense to me as in the US you can be normal VFR up to FL180. Sure you need the 02 requirements but I'm sure there must be loads of folks out there that would benefit from uncontrolled VFR to FL180 and have the ability to do it.
saudipc-9 is offline  
Old 12th January 2005 | 19:28
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 1
From: CYZV
Only ever filed CVFR the once, at 12,500' with a Beaver on floats. If you think it didn't take awhile to get there....
On the up side I was 1:45 for a trip of 320 sm, so I had about an 80kt tail wind.
pigboat is offline  
Old 13th January 2005 | 18:47
  #9 (permalink)  
Ohcirrej
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,919
Likes: 0
From: This is the internet FFS.........
Controlled VFR : A flight conducted under visual flight rules within Class B airspace and in accordance with an ATC clearance.

(ATC Manops Definitions)
Jerricho is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.